From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3596B4FD268 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2026 13:50:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789739440; cv=none; b=ZCYXCJxXnMUdw5mFgXgC74YWW6rGhVf/hzA4VqfCekvOpOiQ1m9goLCrKUkQiNwYjKrFOz/UeBDYN2Nv/+UlKCMEebgERDe/y6AVz4c/tqvcnVIRhJOLY2d6Lkh2F7fj6Ao6I+Qn7oI5rJdPiyMpP790f3bw/cZBq3lj76bb/Dc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789739440; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LecEQKu/SDwbIJ98w082y35hYPM4bZ2YqckHZDStxmM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=W33RfzZcezjlFyPfTdO1+rLytk/vFQrrg3cY+joXpQ+vF0PHPWMra8+IsTFYCPTvywRtTNYjuoUgb/fVXtb0bFPVK3qYhgPWABDueuZDeV7P4R2+iZO9BEPiuvqN6lybS90w+PcHnqOqqmlAIkNm8g+HRVxAegkxd29rhzGxnqA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=ez5bg0rj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="ez5bg0rj" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1789739438; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=p+RBgkHWDBWjcz9ZqG24LQx/Q7KFkaJuhhsDYniJ5qc=; b=ez5bg0rjt/TETEX1fNiBI6lkGo4sES4t4rIWpSGi0h13G425LcFQ9FozHSmKH3XCN/d477 pB/GZ/Nu+gTsitnHatWCXAFEld4HMLRrW/74g7AhGm/NdGLnTaDGXszaCH5cGAx+5U+mUj Ia9qDSu7Z9iHbMUilh/xLq/rhFZQTUA= Received: from mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-627-Enm4X3rPNE62PsWIseykpA-1; Fri, 18 Sep 2026 09:50:34 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Enm4X3rPNE62PsWIseykpA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: Enm4X3rPNE62PsWIseykpA_1789739433 Received: from mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFD2E1800DA1; Fri, 18 Sep 2026 13:50:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from virtlab1023.virt.eng.rdu2.dc.redhat.com (virtlab1023.virt.eng.rdu2.dc.redhat.com [10.18.48.26]) by mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F16A1956042; Fri, 18 Sep 2026 13:50:33 +0000 (UTC) From: Paolo Bonzini To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: nsaenz@amazon.com, vkuznets@redhat.com, snambakam@linux.microsoft.com Subject: [PATCH 02/31] KVM: selftests: Take into account mixed memory fault flags Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 09:50:01 -0400 Message-ID: <20260918135030.171564-3-pbonzini@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20260918135030.171564-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> References: <20260918135030.171564-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.17 From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne Update x86_64/private_mem_kvm_exits_test to take into account memory fault flags might contain multiple bits set while remaining valid---for example KVM might return KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_READ in addition to KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_PRIVATE. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- .../testing/selftests/kvm/x86/private_mem_kvm_exits_test.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/private_mem_kvm_exits_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/private_mem_kvm_exits_test.c index e6d16e9d6120..33fd73465432 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/private_mem_kvm_exits_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/private_mem_kvm_exits_test.c @@ -74,7 +74,8 @@ static void test_private_access_memslot_deleted(void) exit_reason = (u32)(u64)thread_return; TEST_ASSERT_EQ(exit_reason, KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT); - TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->memory_fault.flags, KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_PRIVATE); + TEST_ASSERT(vcpu->run->memory_fault.flags & KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_PRIVATE, + "Memory fault didn't occur on a private memory access"); TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->memory_fault.gpa, EXITS_TEST_GPA); TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->memory_fault.size, EXITS_TEST_SIZE); @@ -103,7 +104,8 @@ static void test_private_access_memslot_not_private(void) exit_reason = run_vcpu_get_exit_reason(vcpu); TEST_ASSERT_EQ(exit_reason, KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT); - TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->memory_fault.flags, KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_PRIVATE); + TEST_ASSERT(vcpu->run->memory_fault.flags & KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_PRIVATE, + "Memory fault didn't occur on a private memory access"); TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->memory_fault.gpa, EXITS_TEST_GPA); TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->memory_fault.size, EXITS_TEST_SIZE); -- 2.52.0