From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21B9D2D77F7; Fri, 18 Sep 2026 22:12:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789769548; cv=none; b=nFHfMnAuip+CHKFSc2is8W5IPjjy9b7e/1mYuJOIIhUqdEljW5fr/ncVF7pU5IbOp8pM7OIxqSgEFDkZ0vgZX1CmK1isiAQOgyWVEfu/PwihX/Dl0ffOAbRZaEPWQctjS6Ym9z1F9tTzKq8kQ3VylUDAvRAWT7ePriANCpM6Y0I= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789769548; c=relaxed/simple; bh=k8POCY/egDpvXClA069OBDuMGtcsu6gfkrYPDxBxw0s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=NDL7mBPVrd/oTwVGko4VRPP69kU2sBVG2qqZh+2KHGARZR2WUl9yWaunlzqaMbSGAOEmwIvXApahhAFgn3LhpqbKHiAyUy8nx1f8I51NyOMwzwjHNQX0rBY5j9sIoUAlMSMJYz9lf8QaUtCUh0PY4TzpiEO3V92iMDYyVB8/3c0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=AbWE2MrW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="AbWE2MrW" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F2591F000FF; Fri, 18 Sep 2026 22:12:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789769546; bh=9wZ1rkEvo1K5BrBGTRVR5i+kLokx8g6L3zjCrGct0E0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=AbWE2MrWk1QwAV72UjBj+g0QyxYJhDdqOX9sGvQBlM5mMAKVHUptErXxbqnE8Qq80 SGK8ndjwjywJehyX7XavP8jPPGJIy2cE6sHK8e38uSuxdvglUA3v09jiCOJQXnzM/H ps3ais8afZ2P9t85jRQHzLfcXNYmYZBCZLtvZdDWcD3myMOojqhzUlVwdJnoiuL2F3 wKibJhWa7iIgIs/pQ5JTYXXJ4QOT3vKrq9iQ4WefySnMW43zCWJCHwrFwgT9LyBY42 xNkSW8YW/vHF2UciIzgaLqP8bouo7CedX+fcnCEVq9kbtO365+EPiDpbn0cFOY1gN8 cOwMzmIEOKPKg== Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 15:12:25 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Nicolai Buchwitz Cc: Ovidiu Panait , andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] selftests: drv-net: Add VLAN test Message-ID: <20260918151225.304410cf@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <5be2136e4142427285566f01d95c1b7b@tipi-net.de> References: <20260918112529.96039-1-ovidiu.panait.rb@renesas.com> <20260918112529.96039-4-ovidiu.panait.rb@renesas.com> <5be2136e4142427285566f01d95c1b7b@tipi-net.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 18 Sep 2026 14:04:13 +0200 Nicolai Buchwitz wrote: > > +LOCAL_IP = os.environ.get("VLAN_LOCAL_V4", "198.51.100.1") > > +REMOTE_IP = os.environ.get("VLAN_REMOTE_V4", "198.51.100.2") > > LOCAL_IP = "198.51.100.1" > REMOTE_IP = "198.51.100.2" LOCAL_IP / REMOTE_IP are in the default network segment (vlan 0) Here we need some "unused" IP subnet that we can assign without conflicts. Getting it from the config would indeed be good, but since this is the first use perhaps we should defer until it actually bothers someone? Or am I missing something?