From: Luka Absandze <absandze@amazon.de>
To: <seanjc@google.com>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: <sandipan.das@amd.com>, <tglx@kernel.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<bp@alien8.de>, <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
<hpa@zytor.com>, <dwmw2@infradead.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Luka Absandze" <absandze@amazon.de>
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86/pmu: Don't retry a counter whose config was rejected
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 16:00:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260918160006.61816-1-absandze@amazon.de> (raw)
kvm_pmu_handle_event() re-arms the reprogram bit for every failed
reprogram, on the assumption that the failure is transient and a later
refresh will succeed. That is true for contention, e.g. the -EBUSY from
x86_reserve_hardware(), but not for a configuration the host PMU driver
rejects outright. A rejected config can never succeed on retry, so the
counter is reprogrammed on every PMU refresh for as long as the guest
leaves it enabled, and every attempt fails the same way.
Skip the re-arm for -EINVAL, one of the errnos the x86 PMU drivers use
for a config they will never accept. Note this becomes reachable on AMD
only with the patch linked below, which starts rejecting the Merge event
(PMCxFFF) a guest programs as part of a Large Increment per Cycle pair;
on Intel it is already reachable today via the INTEL_FIXED_VLBR_EVENT
check in intel_pmu_hw_config(), where the config is likewise a function
of fixed guest state and can never start being accepted.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260916123315.89042-1-absandze@amazon.de/
Signed-off-by: Luka Absandze <absandze@amazon.de>
---
arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
index a7d60c8785cd..b9945a6256ed 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
@@ -680,8 +680,14 @@ void kvm_pmu_handle_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
* reprogram bit, i.e. opportunistically try again on the next
* PMU refresh. Don't make a new request as doing so can stall
* the guest if reprogramming repeatedly fails.
+ *
+ * -EINVAL means the event's config was rejected outright and
+ * can never succeed on retry, so don't re-arm; the guest can
+ * still do so itself by rewriting the event selector.
*/
- if (reprogram_counter(pmc))
+ int r = reprogram_counter(pmc);
+
+ if (r && r != -EINVAL)
set_bit(pmc->idx, pmu->reprogram_pmi);
}
--
2.47.3
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 16:00 Luka Absandze [this message]
2026-09-18 16:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-18 20:21 ` Absandze, Luka
2026-09-18 21:39 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260918160006.61816-1-absandze@amazon.de \
--to=absandze@amazon.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®