From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Alex Elder <elder@riscstar.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
arnd@arndb.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
andersson@kernel.org, konradybcio@kernel.org,
abelvesa@kernel.org, daniel@riscstar.com,
mohd.anwar@oss.qualcomm.com, lorenzo.bianconi@oss.qualcomm.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@suse.com>,
Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] misc: tc9564: introduce base PCI driver
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 12:30:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260918173003.GA1166280@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918152659.413268-3-elder@riscstar.com>
[+cc Andrea, Herve, Lizhi for of_pci_make_dev_node() quirks]
On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 10:26:57AM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
> The Toshiba TC9564 is small and highly-specialized SoC that implements
> a PCIe switch as well as an Ethernet AVB/TSN bridge. In addition to
> these, the SoC implements other functions, including a reset and clock
> controller, an address translation unit, and a few other devices. PCIe
> BARs provide access to registers that manage these IP blocks, and the
> SoC is modeled using a PCI endpoint bus in devicetree. This allows the
> IP blocks to be bound to platform drivers that do MMIO via the PCI BARs.
>
> Create a new PCI driver under drivers/misc that binds with the embedded
> PCI endpoint functions within the TC9564 SoC. Because these functions
> will use devicetree pci-ep-bus to provide access to other IP blocks
> within the TC9564 chip, the main purpose of this driver is to do basic
> PCI initialization, then call of_platform_default_populate() to scan for
> the any endpoint bus children, and probe all devices defined therein.
>
> Because we're using pci-ep-bus, we need to use the PCI quirks mechanism
> to have of_pci_make_dev_node() be called for each endpoint device in
> pci_bus_add_device() (via pci_fixup_device(pci_fixup_final, dev)).
>
> Co-developed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel@riscstar.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel@riscstar.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@riscstar.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> # quirks.c
Not an issue for this patch, but I'm not sure the quirk mechanism is
the best mechanism for doing this. It's not working around a device
defect like most quirks do.
I wonder if pci_bus_add_device() should unconditionally call a wrapper
that calls of_pci_make_dev_node() for bridges and any device that
appears in an allow-list. I guess it sort of amounts to the same
thing in the end, but it might be a little more explicit and not
subject to CONFIG_PCI_QUIRKS.
> +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> @@ -6391,6 +6391,7 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_XILINX, 0x5020, of_pci_make_dev_node);
> DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_XILINX, 0x5021, of_pci_make_dev_node);
> DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_REDHAT, 0x0005, of_pci_make_dev_node);
> DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_EFAR, 0x9660, of_pci_make_dev_node);
> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TOSHIBA, 0x0220, of_pci_make_dev_node);
>
> /*
> * Devices known to require a longer delay before first config space access
> --
> 2.53.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 15:26 [PATCH v4 0/3] PCI: introduce TC9564 misc driver Alex Elder
2026-09-18 15:26 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: misc: introduce pci1179,0220.yaml Alex Elder
2026-09-18 15:26 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] misc: tc9564: introduce base PCI driver Alex Elder
2026-09-18 17:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2026-09-18 17:49 ` Alex Elder
2026-09-18 15:26 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs6490-rb3gen2: add endpoint buses Alex Elder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260918173003.GA1166280@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=abelvesa@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=andrea.porta@suse.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@riscstar.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=elder@riscstar.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizhi.hou@amd.com \
--cc=lorenzo.bianconi@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=mohd.anwar@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®