From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A561322A1F for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2026 00:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789779054; cv=none; b=hFGo64NAU4Kw1dmmsq6h4uuLFkpWEZOvS2teacWggKTTAJR1VirStPepD2KGvqcMksowu0DS19MwKo7YfX7yakODYhhfCr4sSjfjjLqCSQynbD+0/IFj4LwAcmF/PINSO6pXptuij0W3F8r7FiqCPJKjjLvmmGgUTNFT1qQ47H0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789779054; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Y4xg4EWs6TC0dejQIBsxK+mBitSOm4PAPm6bmuK4se0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=Y8o/Ak+1/1bmdo1pv93I9x8OZ4ZEeTVIIf1TVWAMx3JaArGH29F1y0bTBku3SfH/nXRb71wA+AJ1KDU7cCa0fb3HnHU40NV/sqX4M+PhnooX39TNJef150WpB0KQ0RU7qttXonDUmsdqiidHBwbXcPMsgOJGAfnnNuZks4AVXTU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=OWiegJOT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="OWiegJOT" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 79DE61F000FF; Sat, 19 Sep 2026 00:50:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789779044; bh=b1tw2IOdATgIAgeOtOU6aYsEKazCC4468v0MK6zfWn8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=OWiegJOT1477KjdFWhk3YWWOb8Ji4XwOajTwo+QzhXmIeDeigdMcClxq8G7x4Z2Oc rzKQTSyW0MOe2pDyHt1AotVNoYDH9Mzy1Bex5xwq5xb+Zx0z0b/MFvQAvMdyyOYDy9 D+bnKsVZxc8Ytl9ZuAUxlxHbWYPrtoVfbUY9uQI8eHCbeQN/MRJSmXhnVQQ5GgiPb2 VgG9W2qD//8bh0MfSJ8dSmReZaQnCEHGfsGxKzxQSlCNfRg2n73EPplJLIpSQuCE6Z rQAEI8jNCb3zIiRgkoK1Yv4mmDwEXHxn5bfHY6hov+wysyw7XcQzM2M2V57O5PK30j C5HqY5aFpZkCA== From: SJ Park To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" Cc: SJ Park , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Zi Yan , Matthew Brost , Joshua Hahn , Byungchul Park , Gregory Price , Ying Huang , Alistair Popple , Rakie Kim , Lorenzo Stoakes , "Liam R. Howlett" , Vlastimil Babka , Mike Rapoport , Suren Baghdasaryan , Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] MAINTAINERS: move memory tiering under MEMORY MANAGEMENT - NUMA PLACEMENT Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 17:50:36 -0700 Message-ID: <20260919005036.87201-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260918-maintainers-mempolicy-v1-2-9a94cac6d135@kernel.org> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Fri, 18 Sep 2026 18:34:25 +0200 "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" wrote: > NUMA PLACEMENT is a better place for memory tiering. I agree that's a good placement :) > > My best guess is that existing MISC reviewers are not that interested in > memory tiering, so don't carry any over. > > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) Reviewed-byt: SJ Park Thanks, SJ [...]