From: Nguyen Ngoc Thang <ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Nguyen Ngoc Thang <ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+1075f6dc93f398c1857e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH] Input: serio - don't sleep on serio_mutex from drvctl_store()
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2026 19:46:04 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260919124604.210505-1-ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com> (raw)
Writing to the drvctl attribute takes serio_mutex while holding the
attribute's kernfs active reference. serio_unregister_port() does the
opposite: it holds serio_mutex and device_del() then waits for active
references to drain in kernfs_drain(). If a drvctl write is in flight
when the port is unregistered, the writer waits for serio_mutex and the
unregistering task waits for the writer, and neither makes progress.
Interruptibility of the lock does not help, as nothing signals the writer.
lockdep reports it as:
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
repro/4908 is trying to acquire lock:
(kn->active){++++}-{0:0}, at: __kernfs_remove+0x34c/0xb90
but task is already holding lock:
(serio_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: serio_unregister_port+0x1b/0x40
drvctl_store
sysfs_kf_write
...
kernfs_drain
device_del
serio_destroy_port
serio_unregister_port
userio_char_release
Use mutex_trylock() and restart the syscall when the mutex is busy, so
the active reference is dropped before waiting. Once the port is being
removed the retried write fails with -ENODEV.
Reported-by: syzbot+1075f6dc93f398c1857e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=1075f6dc93f398c1857e
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Nguyen Ngoc Thang <ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com>
---
Root cause: drvctl_store() runs with the attribute's kernfs active reference
held and then takes serio_mutex. serio_unregister_port() takes serio_mutex and
then device_del() -> kernfs_drain() waits for all active references to drop.
A drvctl write that is in flight when the port is unregistered therefore waits
for serio_mutex while the unregistering task waits for that writer: a real
AB-BA deadlock, not just a lockdep false positive. mutex_lock_interruptible()
does not help as nobody signals the writer.
Reproduced in QEMU (x86_64, syzbot config, lockdep): a small program creates
and closes /dev/userio ports in a loop while 4 threads write "psmouse" to the
new port's drvctl. Unpatched kernel: the same circular-dependency splat as the
syzbot report (kn->active <-> serio_mutex, drvctl_store vs
serio_unregister_port/userio_char_release). An earlier, cruder run also left
the unregistering task blocked for >143s (hung task). Patched kernel: 20
create/close rounds complete, no lockdep report, no hang.
Fix: take serio_mutex with mutex_trylock() and restart_syscall() if busy, so
the active reference is dropped before waiting; once removal has begun the
retried write fails with -ENODEV. The only former failure, -EINTR on a signal,
is now covered by the normal syscall restart path.
The Fixes tag points at the original import: the lock order predates git
history (serio_sem) and I could not find a narrower commit.
drivers/input/serio/serio.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/serio/serio.c b/drivers/input/serio/serio.c
index 54dd26249b02..811e65fd4eb3 100644
--- a/drivers/input/serio/serio.c
+++ b/drivers/input/serio/serio.c
@@ -357,7 +357,8 @@ static ssize_t drvctl_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, c
struct device_driver *drv;
int error;
- scoped_cond_guard(mutex_intr, return -EINTR, &serio_mutex) {
+ /* Port removal holds serio_mutex and drains us: don't wait for it. */
+ scoped_cond_guard(mutex_try, return restart_syscall(), &serio_mutex) {
if (!strncmp(buf, "none", count)) {
serio_disconnect_port(serio);
} else if (!strncmp(buf, "reconnect", count)) {
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-19 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-19 12:46 Nguyen Ngoc Thang [this message]
2026-09-23 23:02 ` kernel test robot
2026-09-24 4:09 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260919124604.210505-1-ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com \
--to=ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+1075f6dc93f398c1857e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®