mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nguyen Ngoc Thang <ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com>
To: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>,
	Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@kernel.org>,
	Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>,
	Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
Cc: v9fs@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Nguyen Ngoc Thang <ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com>,
	syzbot+de6fd6789748a8aa64a0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] 9p: bound the xattr size used to allocate the ACL buffer
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2026 20:29:29 +0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260919132929.238025-1-ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8777483.NyiUUSuA9g@weasel>

v9fs_fid_get_acl() sizes its kzalloc() buffer from the xattr length
reported by the 9p server. A server, or a syzbot-style fake one, can
report an arbitrarily large value. When it exceeds what the page
allocator can serve, mounting with posixacl,access=client trips:

  WARNING: mm/page_alloc.c:5340 at __alloc_frozen_pages_noprof
   ___kmalloc_large_node
   v9fs_fid_get_acl
   v9fs_get_acl
   v9fs_inode_from_fid_dotl
   v9fs_get_tree

The allocation cannot succeed anyway and the failure is already mapped
to -EIO by __v9fs_get_acl(), so reject sizes above KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE
up front instead of tripping the allocator's warning. Larger ACLs that
kmalloc can still serve are unaffected.

Reported-by: syzbot+de6fd6789748a8aa64a0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=de6fd6789748a8aa64a0
Fixes: 85ff872d3f4a ("fs/9p: Implement POSIX ACL permission checking function")
Signed-off-by: Nguyen Ngoc Thang <ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com>
---
Hi Christian,

Thanks, agreed: XATTR_SIZE_MAX would wrongly limit servers with larger
9p xattrs. v2 caps at KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE, which is already the effective
limit, so nothing that worked before changes; it only avoids the
allocator warning for sizes that could never be served.

v2:
 - Bound by KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE instead of XATTR_SIZE_MAX so that ACLs from
   servers with larger 9p xattrs keep working (Christian).
 - Reworded the commit message accordingly.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260919102958.142460-1-ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com/

 fs/9p/acl.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/9p/acl.c b/fs/9p/acl.c
index 0dd7e72bbdd3..915877cbaded 100644
--- a/fs/9p/acl.c
+++ b/fs/9p/acl.c
@@ -29,8 +29,8 @@ static struct posix_acl *v9fs_fid_get_acl(struct p9_fid *fid, const char *name)
 		return ERR_PTR(size);
 	if (size == 0)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENODATA);
-	/* the size is server-controlled; a valid ACL fits in an xattr */
-	if (size > XATTR_SIZE_MAX)
+	/* the size is server-controlled; it cannot exceed what kmalloc serves */
+	if (size > KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE)
 		return ERR_PTR(-E2BIG);
 
 	value = kzalloc(size, GFP_NOFS);
-- 
2.43.0


      reply	other threads:[~2026-09-19 13:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-19 10:29 [PATCH] " Nguyen Ngoc Thang
2026-09-19 13:02 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2026-09-19 13:29   ` Nguyen Ngoc Thang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260919132929.238025-1-ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com \
    --to=ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com \
    --cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
    --cc=ericvh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
    --cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
    --cc=syzbot+de6fd6789748a8aa64a0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=v9fs@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®