From: Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com>
To: axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] io_uring: fix cloned compound buffer accounting and R_DISABLED restriction bypass
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2026 22:17:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260919221725.3706704-1-benquike@gmail.com> (raw)
Fix two issues in io_uring buffer registration and restriction
enforcement:
1. In io_uring/rsrc.c, when registered compound buffers are cloned
across rings via IORING_REGISTER_BUFFERS2 /
IORING_RSRC_REGISTER_SPARSE, unaccounting on release can underflow
mm->pinned_vm and user->locked_vm if head pages are unaccounted
multiple times or against a different accounting context. Track per-
imu accounting ownership cleanly.
2. In io_uring/register.c, enforce IO_RING_F_REG_RESTRICTED on rings
created with IORING_SETUP_R_DISABLED so restricted opcodes cannot be
invoked before restrictions are registered and enabled.
Fixes: 735729844819 ("io_uring: move rsrc related data, core, and commands")
Fixes: c43203154d8a ("io_uring/register: move io_uring_register(2) related code to register.c")
Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com>
---
diff --git a/io_uring/register.c b/io_uring/register.c
index 02bc103bcc9d..ad6f2a3c98a0 100644
--- a/io_uring/register.c
+++ b/io_uring/register.c
@@ -764,7 +764,7 @@ static int __io_uring_register(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned opcode,
if (ctx->submitter_task && ctx->submitter_task != current)
return -EEXIST;
- if ((ctx->int_flags & IO_RING_F_REG_RESTRICTED) && !(ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_R_DISABLED)) {
+ if (ctx->int_flags & IO_RING_F_REG_RESTRICTED) {
opcode = array_index_nospec(opcode, IORING_REGISTER_LAST);
if (!test_bit(opcode, ctx->restrictions.register_op))
return -EACCES;
diff --git a/io_uring/rsrc.c b/io_uring/rsrc.c
index 51b46e624ddd..1efaf29514e8 100644
--- a/io_uring/rsrc.c
+++ b/io_uring/rsrc.c
@@ -174,8 +174,8 @@ static void io_free_imu(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_mapped_ubuf *imu)
kvfree(imu);
}
-static unsigned long io_buffer_unaccount_pages(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
- struct io_mapped_ubuf *imu)
+static unsigned long io_imu_unaccount_hpages(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
+ struct io_mapped_ubuf *imu)
{
struct page *seen = NULL;
unsigned long acct = 0;
@@ -188,17 +188,14 @@ static unsigned long io_buffer_unaccount_pages(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
struct page *page = imu->bvec[i].bv_page;
struct page *hpage;
- if (!PageCompound(page)) {
- acct++;
+ if (!PageCompound(page))
continue;
- }
hpage = compound_head(page);
if (hpage == seen)
continue;
seen = hpage;
- /* Unaccount on last reference */
if (hpage_acct_unref(ctx, hpage))
acct += page_size(hpage) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
cond_resched();
@@ -207,18 +204,38 @@ static unsigned long io_buffer_unaccount_pages(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
return acct;
}
+static unsigned long io_imu_unaccount_reg_pages(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
+ struct io_mapped_ubuf *imu)
+{
+ unsigned long acct = 0;
+ int i;
+
+ if (imu->flags & IO_REGBUF_F_KBUF || !ctx->user)
+ return 0;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < imu->nr_bvecs; i++) {
+ if (!PageCompound(imu->bvec[i].bv_page))
+ acct++;
+ }
+ return acct;
+}
+
static void io_buffer_unmap(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_mapped_ubuf *imu)
{
- unsigned long acct_pages = 0;
+ unsigned long acct_pages;
- /* Always decrement, so it works for cloned buffers too */
- acct_pages = io_buffer_unaccount_pages(ctx, imu);
+ /* Compound hpages are accounted per-ring in ctx->hpage_acct */
+ acct_pages = io_imu_unaccount_hpages(ctx, imu);
if (unlikely(refcount_read(&imu->refs) > 1)) {
- if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&imu->refs))
+ if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&imu->refs)) {
+ if (acct_pages)
+ io_unaccount_mem(ctx->user, ctx->mm_account, acct_pages);
return;
+ }
}
+ acct_pages += io_imu_unaccount_reg_pages(ctx, imu);
if (acct_pages)
io_unaccount_mem(ctx->user, ctx->mm_account, acct_pages);
imu->release(imu->priv);
@@ -1280,6 +1297,7 @@ static int io_buffer_acct_cloned_hpages(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
struct io_mapped_ubuf *imu)
{
struct page *seen = NULL;
+ unsigned long acct = 0;
int i, ret = 0;
if (imu->flags & IO_REGBUF_F_KBUF || !ctx->user)
@@ -1302,10 +1320,14 @@ static int io_buffer_acct_cloned_hpages(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
ret = hpage_acct_ref(ctx, hpage, &acct_new);
if (ret)
break;
+ if (acct_new)
+ acct += page_size(hpage) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
cond_resched();
}
+ if (!ret && acct)
+ ret = io_account_mem(ctx->user, ctx->mm_account, acct);
if (!ret)
return 0;
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-19 22:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-19 22:17 Hui Peng [this message]
2026-09-21 16:04 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260919221725.3706704-1-benquike@gmail.com \
--to=benquike@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®