From: Zhang Peng <zippermonkey@icloud.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>, Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
Baoquan He <baoquan.he@linux.dev>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Zhang Peng <bruzzhang@tencent.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] mm/vmscan: extract folio pageout from shrink_folio_list()
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2026 22:24:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260920-vmscan-refactor-v1-3-ec04d71cb761@tencent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260920-vmscan-refactor-v1-0-ec04d71cb761@tencent.com>
From: Zhang Peng <bruzzhang@tencent.com>
shrink_folio_list() contains a self-contained pageout() dispatch state
machine. Extract it into folio_try_pageout() so it can be reused by the
batched pageout path.
Return an explicit pageout result instead of a boolean. This keeps the
important distinction between activating and merely keeping a folio
visible to the caller, and also records whether a kept folio remains
locked after pageout().
The clean and synchronous-write cases return FOLIO_PAGEOUT_FREE: the
folio is still locked there, and shrink_folio_list() then runs its
single folio_try_reclaim_free() call, so the reclaim-free step keeps
exactly one caller.
The PAGE_ACTIVATE arm no longer normalises nr_pages to 1 after a split:
folio_activate_locked() derives the count from folio_nr_pages() itself,
which is equal by construction once the folio is order-0. Note this
makes the patch depend on patch 1; applying it alone would over-account
nr_activate for a split shmem folio.
No functional change.
---
mm/vmscan.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 120085dfa2fe..3bce7ff89293 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1266,8 +1266,60 @@ static enum folio_reclaim_result folio_try_reclaim_free(struct folio *folio,
return FOLIO_RECLAIM_SUCCESS;
}
+enum folio_pageout_result {
+ FOLIO_PAGEOUT_KEEP_LOCKED,
+ FOLIO_PAGEOUT_KEEP_UNLOCKED,
+ FOLIO_PAGEOUT_ACTIVATE,
+ FOLIO_PAGEOUT_FREE, /* folio is locked, hand it to folio_try_reclaim_free() */
+};
+
+static enum folio_pageout_result folio_try_pageout(struct folio *folio,
+ struct scan_control *sc, struct swap_io_ctx *ctx,
+ struct list_head *folio_list)
+{
+ struct address_space *mapping = folio_mapping(folio);
+ unsigned int nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
+
+ switch (pageout(ctx, mapping, folio, folio_list)) {
+ case PAGE_ACTIVATE:
+ /*
+ * If shmem folio is split when writeback to swap, the
+ * tail pages will make their own pass through this
+ * function and be accounted then. There is no need to
+ * clamp nr_pages here: folio_activate_locked() derives
+ * the count from folio_nr_pages() itself.
+ */
+ if (nr_pages > 1 && !folio_test_large(folio))
+ sc->nr_scanned -= (nr_pages - 1);
+ return FOLIO_PAGEOUT_ACTIVATE;
+ case PAGE_KEEP:
+ return FOLIO_PAGEOUT_KEEP_LOCKED;
+ case PAGE_SUCCESS:
+ if (nr_pages > 1 && !folio_test_large(folio))
+ sc->nr_scanned -= (nr_pages - 1);
+
+ if (folio_test_writeback(folio))
+ return FOLIO_PAGEOUT_KEEP_UNLOCKED;
+ if (folio_test_dirty(folio))
+ return FOLIO_PAGEOUT_KEEP_UNLOCKED;
+
+ /*
+ * A synchronous write - probably a ramdisk. Go ahead
+ * and try to reclaim the folio.
+ */
+ if (!folio_trylock(folio))
+ return FOLIO_PAGEOUT_KEEP_UNLOCKED;
+ if (folio_test_dirty(folio) || folio_test_writeback(folio))
+ return FOLIO_PAGEOUT_KEEP_LOCKED;
+ fallthrough;
+ case PAGE_CLEAN:
+ return FOLIO_PAGEOUT_FREE;
+ }
+ unreachable();
+}
+
/*
- * shrink_folio_list() returns the number of reclaimed pages
+ * Reclaimed folios are counted in the return value.
*/
static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list,
struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc,
@@ -1585,7 +1637,6 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list,
if (folio_maybe_dma_pinned(folio))
goto activate_locked;
- mapping = folio_mapping(folio);
if (folio_test_dirty(folio)) {
if (folio_is_file_lru(folio)) {
/*
@@ -1606,50 +1657,21 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list,
goto keep_locked;
if (!sc->may_writepage)
goto keep_locked;
-
/*
* Folio is dirty. Flush the TLB if a writable entry
* potentially exists to avoid CPU writes after I/O
* starts and then write it out here.
*/
try_to_unmap_flush_dirty();
- switch (pageout(&ctx, mapping, folio, folio_list)) {
- case PAGE_KEEP:
- goto keep_locked;
- case PAGE_ACTIVATE:
- /*
- * If shmem folio is split when writeback to swap,
- * the tail pages will make their own pass through
- * this function and be accounted then.
- */
- if (nr_pages > 1 && !folio_test_large(folio)) {
- sc->nr_scanned -= (nr_pages - 1);
- nr_pages = 1;
- }
+ switch (folio_try_pageout(folio, sc, &ctx, folio_list)) {
+ case FOLIO_PAGEOUT_ACTIVATE:
goto activate_locked;
- case PAGE_SUCCESS:
- if (nr_pages > 1 && !folio_test_large(folio)) {
- sc->nr_scanned -= (nr_pages - 1);
- nr_pages = 1;
- }
- if (folio_test_writeback(folio))
- goto keep;
- if (folio_test_dirty(folio))
- goto keep;
-
- /*
- * A synchronous write - probably a ramdisk. Go
- * ahead and try to reclaim the folio.
- */
- if (!folio_trylock(folio))
- goto keep;
- if (folio_test_dirty(folio) ||
- folio_test_writeback(folio))
- goto keep_locked;
- mapping = folio_mapping(folio);
- fallthrough;
- case PAGE_CLEAN:
- ; /* try to free the folio below */
+ case FOLIO_PAGEOUT_KEEP_LOCKED:
+ goto keep_locked;
+ case FOLIO_PAGEOUT_KEEP_UNLOCKED:
+ goto keep;
+ case FOLIO_PAGEOUT_FREE:
+ break; /* folio is locked; try to free it below */
}
}
--
2.55.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-20 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-20 14:24 [PATCH 0/4] mm/vmscan: refactor shrink_folio_list() Zhang Peng
2026-09-20 14:24 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm/vmscan: introduce folio_activate_locked() helper Zhang Peng
2026-09-20 14:24 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm/vmscan: extract folio reclaim freeing from shrink_folio_list() Zhang Peng
2026-09-20 14:24 ` Zhang Peng [this message]
2026-09-20 14:24 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm/vmscan: extract folio unmap logic into folio_try_unmap() Zhang Peng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260920-vmscan-refactor-v1-3-ec04d71cb761@tencent.com \
--to=zippermonkey@icloud.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
--cc=bruzzhang@tencent.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®