From: Kayra Cizmeci <kayracizmeci@gmail.com>
To: albin_yang@163.com
Cc: albinwyang@tencent.com, bsegall@google.com, chen.yu@linux.dev,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
kayracizmeci@gmail.com, kprateek.nayak@amd.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mgorman@suse.de, mingo@redhat.com,
mintaohuang@tencent.com, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
vschneid@redhat.com, yu.c.chen@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/stats: Fix run_delay over-count for migrated sched_delayed tasks
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2026 14:15:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260920111535.117996-1-kayracizmeci@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260920043116.1298017-1-albin_yang@163.com>
Hi Wei,
> Load balance is affected too: the sched_delayed check in can_migrate_task()
> bails out only when env->migration_type != migrate_load, so it does not
> block migration when the type is migrate_load - which active load balance
> always uses (its lb_env leaves migration_type at 0 == migrate_load), and
> which regular load balance can also use via calculate_imbalance(). Either
> way the re-attach goes through attach_task() -> activate_task(rq, p,
> ENQUEUE_NOCLOCK), without ENQUEUE_RESTORE.
> @@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ static void sched_info_arrive(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *t)
> */
> static inline void sched_info_enqueue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *t)
> {
> - if (!t->sched_info.last_queued)
> + if (!t->sched_info.last_queued && !t->se.sched_delayed)
> t->sched_info.last_queued = rq_clock(rq);
> }
Well sched_info_enqueue() gets called from 2 places. The comment above says
otherwise but it's wrong. It gets called from sched_info_depart() and
enqueue_task().
I'll send a patch about that comment later.
Anyway,
Let's say detach_one_task() found the p to detach on active_load_balance_cpu_stop(),
from there, p goes to attach_task() from there. And then
activate_task(), therefore enqueue_task() and
sched_info_enqueue().
If p is delayed then, correctly the sched_info_enqueue() will not start the clock.
If not, it will.
On the second call chain tho, there are task_is_running protection before entering sched_info_enqueue(),
therefore a task cannot run if it is delayed. So the patch's case never runs on that path.
Here:
Reviewed-by: Kayra Cizmeci <kayracizmeci@gmail.com>
Thanks,
Kayra :>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-20 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-20 4:31 albin_yang
2026-09-20 11:15 ` Kayra Cizmeci [this message]
2026-09-21 5:32 ` K Prateek Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260920111535.117996-1-kayracizmeci@gmail.com \
--to=kayracizmeci@gmail.com \
--cc=albin_yang@163.com \
--cc=albinwyang@tencent.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chen.yu@linux.dev \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mintaohuang@tencent.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®