From: Stanley Jhu <stanleyjhu@google.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Stanley Jhu <stanleyjhu@google.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@kernel.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@sandisk.com>,
Peter Wang <peter.wang@mediatek.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>,
"Bao D. Nguyen" <quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com>,
Can Guo <can.guo@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] scsi: ufs: core: Decouple CQ sweep from request iterator in MCQ
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2026 21:49:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260920135014.3528082-1-stanleyjhu@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1ddc5181-f547-465c-bfbe-dbf14a91493e@acm.org>
On 9/18/26 9:06 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Forcibly completing SCSI commands from inside the UFS SCSI host reset
> error handling callback is incompatible with the SCSI core error
> handler. The "force_compl" behavior should be removed instead of
> reworking it. If you take a look at the SDB (single doorbell) code you
> will see that forcibly completing requests doesn't happen for SDB mode.
Note that ufshcd_mcq_force_compl_one() already checks
!test_bit(SCMD_STATE_COMPLETE, &cmd->state), so it only completes non-EH
commands (e.g. during an autonomous ufshcd_err_handler() reset); in SDB
mode, ufshcd_hba_stop() (HCE = 0) clears UTRLDBR to 0, so ufshcd_poll()
similarly treats all outstanding_reqs as completed right after
ufshcd_hba_stop().
That said, doing this inside ufshcd_host_reset_and_restore() right after
ufshcd_hba_stop() is indeed the wrong place: at controller stop time we
should only release LLD resources (ufshcd_release_scsi_cmd()), and
requeue any remaining non-EH (!SCMD_STATE_COMPLETE) commands with
DID_REQUEUE only after host/link recovery finishes (so autonomous resets
neither wake callers mid-reset nor leave in-flight I/O stalled for the
30s block layer timeout, similar to autonomous reset handling in
hisi_sas, megaraid_sas, and smartpqi).
Let's drop this v2 series. I will send a separate 2-patch series shortly
to replace this and remove force_compl and
ufshcd_mcq_compl_all_cqes_lock().
Thanks,
Stanley
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-20 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 12:23 [PATCH] scsi: ufs: core: Avoid unsafe MMIO reads in ufshcd_mcq_compl_all_cqes_lock() Stanley Jhu
2026-09-18 14:38 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] scsi: ufs: core: Fix unsafe MMIO reads and redundant CQ sweeps in MCQ reset Stanley Jhu
2026-09-18 14:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: ufs: core: Avoid unsafe MMIO reads in ufshcd_mcq_compl_all_cqes_lock() Stanley Jhu
2026-09-18 14:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] scsi: ufs: core: Decouple CQ sweep from request iterator in MCQ Stanley Jhu
2026-09-18 16:06 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-09-20 13:49 ` Stanley Jhu [this message]
2026-09-21 17:13 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-09-18 22:15 ` [PATCH] scsi: ufs: core: Avoid unsafe MMIO reads in ufshcd_mcq_compl_all_cqes_lock() Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260920135014.3528082-1-stanleyjhu@google.com \
--to=stanleyjhu@google.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=avri.altman@sandisk.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=can.guo@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=mkp@kernel.org \
--cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®