mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhang Peng <zippermonkey@icloud.com>
To: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Cc: Zhang Peng <zippermonkey@icloud.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
	Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
	Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
	Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>,
	Zhang Peng <bruzzhang@tencent.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] mm/vmscan: extract pageout_one() from shrink_folio_list()
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2026 22:46:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260920144647.43333-1-zippermonkey@icloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGsJ_4zOfR3Rn5tk_RcOWUDmREO1JyRwXA15Vr3aeUs=+ybMMA@mail.gmail.com>

[Resending this one on its own - my first attempt accidentally sent
all four replies concatenated into a single mail, see
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260920143816.39827-1-zippermonkey@icloud.com/
Sorry for the noise.]

On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 5:49 AM Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Also, this patch looks basically good, just like the previous one.
> Could we also avoid hiding the activation semantics in the inner
> function? It would be clearer to make the activation semantics
> explicit at the outer level, so readers don't have to dig into a
> deep internal function to realize that a folio may take the
> activation path.
>
> In LRU, we have two distinct possibilities: activate a folio or just
> keep it. This is an important semantic distinction in the LRU logic.
> Hiding the activation decision so deep in an inner function makes
> that semantic much less obvious.

Done, same treatment as 2/5 - the helper reports the decision and the
caller acts on it:

	enum folio_pageout_result {
		FOLIO_PAGEOUT_KEEP_LOCKED,
		FOLIO_PAGEOUT_KEEP_UNLOCKED,
		FOLIO_PAGEOUT_ACTIVATE,
		FOLIO_PAGEOUT_FREE,	/* folio is locked, hand it to
					   folio_try_reclaim_free() */
	};

	switch (folio_try_pageout(folio, sc, &ctx, folio_list)) {
	case FOLIO_PAGEOUT_ACTIVATE:
		goto activate_locked;
	case FOLIO_PAGEOUT_KEEP_LOCKED:
		goto keep_locked;
	case FOLIO_PAGEOUT_KEEP_UNLOCKED:
		goto keep;
	case FOLIO_PAGEOUT_FREE:
		break;	/* folio is locked; try to free it below */
	}

Two things beyond what you asked for, both because pageout() has more
outcomes than the freeing path does:

 - "keep" is split into KEEP_LOCKED and KEEP_UNLOCKED. pageout() can
   return with the folio either still locked or already unlocked, and
   previously the caller had to know which internal branch it came
   from to pick between the keep_locked and keep labels. Now the
   result says so.

 - FOLIO_PAGEOUT_FREE keeps the "and now try to free it" step at the
   outer level too, instead of chaining into folio_try_reclaim_free()
   from inside folio_try_pageout().

This patch is in the cleanup-only series, see my reply on 5/5.

Thanks
Zhang Peng

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-20 14:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-20  5:07 [PATCH v5 0/5] mm: batch TLB flushing for dirty folios in vmscan Zhang Peng
2026-07-20  5:07 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] mm/vmscan: introduce folio_activate_locked() helper Zhang Peng
2026-08-10  8:36   ` Barry Song
2026-09-20 14:38     ` Zhang Peng
2026-07-20  5:07 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] mm/vmscan: extract folio_free() from shrink_folio_list() Zhang Peng
2026-08-13 21:40   ` Barry Song
2026-09-20 14:45     ` Zhang Peng
2026-07-20  5:07 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] mm/vmscan: extract pageout_one() " Zhang Peng
2026-08-13 21:49   ` Barry Song
2026-09-20 14:46     ` Zhang Peng [this message]
2026-07-20  5:07 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] mm/vmscan: extract folio unmap logic into folio_try_unmap() Zhang Peng
2026-08-13 21:52   ` Barry Song
2026-07-20  5:07 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] mm/vmscan: flush TLB for every 31 folios evictions Zhang Peng
2026-08-13 21:58   ` Barry Song
2026-09-20 14:47     ` Zhang Peng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260920144647.43333-1-zippermonkey@icloud.com \
    --to=zippermonkey@icloud.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=bruzzhang@tencent.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kasong@tencent.com \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=yuanchu@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®