From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/17] KVM: selftests: Add nested transition benchmark
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2026 21:52:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260920215229.BA8101F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260920211920.928306-18-dwmw2@infradead.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] kvm: selftests: mismatch between commit message (100k) and code (10k) iterations
--
commit fe906ec5562df5e882aa5dfe67e35c886ebd82f2
Author: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
KVM: selftests: Add nested transition benchmark
This commit adds a benchmark to measure L1 to L2 nested virtualization
transition costs. It tests the reflected-exit phase and an MSR-intercept
phase on SVM, reporting performance metrics from L1's perspective.
> Measure L1<->L2 transition costs from L1's viewpoint, in TSC cycles:
> a reflected-exit phase (cpuid in L2, forwarded to L1: the full
> emulated vmexit->vmentry round trip, exercising the vmcb12/vmcs12
> access paths), and on SVM an MSR-intercept phase (rdmsr in L2 with
> INTERCEPT_MSR_PROT: exercises the per-intercept lookup in L1's MSR
> permissions map). Reports min/avg/p50/p99/max over 100k iterations.
[Severity: Medium]
Is the iteration count in the commit message accurate? The message states
the benchmark reports over 100k iterations, but the code defines N_ITERS
as 10000 and explicitly notes that 10k samples is sufficient:
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/nested_transition_bench.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/nested_transition_bench.c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/nested_transition_bench.c
[ ... ]
> +/*
> + * Keep the iteration count modest: every timed iteration includes a
> + * ucall round trip to userspace to report its sample, which on a
> + * debug (KASAN) kernel costs milliseconds. 10k samples still give a
> + * stable p99.
> + */
> +#define N_WARMUP 1000
> +#define N_ITERS 10000
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260920211920.928306-1-dwmw2@infradead.org?part=17
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-20 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-20 20:49 [PATCH 00/17] KVM: Use atomic SRCU for gfn-to-pfn cache, reinstate guest mode for x86 nesting David Woodhouse
2026-09-20 20:49 ` [PATCH 01/17] KVM: pfncache: Use atomic SRCU for readers instead of a rwlock David Woodhouse
2026-09-20 21:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 1:42 ` Hillf Danton
2026-09-21 9:54 ` David Woodhouse
2026-09-21 11:21 ` Hillf Danton
2026-09-21 11:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-20 20:49 ` [PATCH 02/17] KVM: x86/xen: Extract delivery of event to vCPU into a separate helper David Woodhouse
2026-09-20 20:49 ` [PATCH 03/17] KVM: x86/xen: Explicitly tag "shared info" page as never being dirty tracked David Woodhouse
2026-09-20 20:49 ` [PATCH 04/17] KVM: x86/xen: Don't dirty track "vCPU info" page David Woodhouse
2026-09-20 20:49 ` [PATCH 05/17] KVM: x86: Request the guest TLB flush from record_steal_time() David Woodhouse
2026-09-20 20:49 ` [PATCH 06/17] KVM: x86: Use gfn_to_pfn_cache for steal time / preempted status David Woodhouse
2026-09-20 22:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-20 20:49 ` [PATCH 07/17] KVM: pfncache: Add guest-mode pinning (GUEST_USES_PFN successor) David Woodhouse
2026-09-20 21:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-20 20:49 ` [PATCH 08/17] KVM: pfncache: Return -EAGAIN for a lookup which hits an invalid memslot David Woodhouse
2026-09-20 21:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-20 20:49 ` [PATCH 09/17] KVM: x86: Post KVM_REQ_GET_NESTED_STATE_PAGES on memslot updates David Woodhouse
2026-09-20 20:49 ` [PATCH 10/17] KVM: nVMX: Implement cache for L1 MSR bitmap David Woodhouse
2026-09-20 21:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-20 20:49 ` [PATCH 11/17] KVM: nVMX: Use pinned pfncache for L1 APIC virtualization pages David Woodhouse
2026-09-20 21:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-20 20:49 ` [PATCH 12/17] KVM: selftests: Add nested VMX APIC cache invalidation test David Woodhouse
2026-09-20 21:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-20 20:49 ` [PATCH 13/17] KVM: x86: Move nested GPC lock helpers to x86.h as kvm_gpc_lock_page() David Woodhouse
2026-09-20 20:49 ` [PATCH 14/17] KVM: nSVM: Use a gfn_to_pfn_cache for the vmcb12 page David Woodhouse
2026-09-20 20:49 ` [PATCH 15/17] KVM: nSVM: Cache L1's MSR permissions map pages David Woodhouse
2026-09-20 20:49 ` [PATCH 16/17] KVM: nSVM: Cache L1's IO " David Woodhouse
2026-09-20 20:49 ` [PATCH 17/17] KVM: selftests: Add nested transition benchmark David Woodhouse
2026-09-20 21:52 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260920215229.BA8101F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®