From: Tal Zussman <tz2294@columbia.edu>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@kernel.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
John Garry <john.garry@linux.dev>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@kernel.org>
Cc: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>,
Tal Zussman <tz2294@columbia.edu>
Subject: [PATCH v4 6/8] block: don't fall back to buffered I/O for atomic writes
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 22:54:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260921-blkdev-fixes-v4-6-e2801f71ede9@columbia.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260921-blkdev-fixes-v4-0-e2801f71ede9@columbia.edu>
blkdev_direct_write() turns an -EBUSY from page cache invalidation into
a 0 return, so an IOCB_ATOMIC write is retried in full through
blkdev_buffered_write(), with no atomicity guarantee.
Skip the buffered fallback in blkdev_write_iter() for IOCB_ATOMIC, as
it already does for IOCB_NOWAIT, so the -EBUSY case returns -EAGAIN and
the caller retries, matching __iomap_dio_rw().
ext4 has the same fallback and only warns in it. For block devices the
fallback can be skipped before any I/O is submitted, so fail early
instead.
Fixes: caf336f81b3a ("block: Add fops atomic write support")
Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260802-blkdev-fixes-v1-0-a82fc549fd74%40columbia.edu?part=2
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-fable-5
Signed-off-by: Tal Zussman <tz2294@columbia.edu>
---
block/fops.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/fops.c b/block/fops.c
index 90777e8a9a6c..7f23778f6b81 100644
--- a/block/fops.c
+++ b/block/fops.c
@@ -766,10 +766,11 @@ static ssize_t blkdev_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT) {
ret = blkdev_direct_write(iocb, from);
if (ret >= 0 && iov_iter_count(from)) {
- if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT) {
+ if (iocb->ki_flags & (IOCB_NOWAIT | IOCB_ATOMIC)) {
/*
* The buffered fallback blocks on i_rwsem and
- * on writeback of the data it copied: return
+ * on writeback of the data it copied, and
+ * can't provide torn-write protection: return
* the short direct write instead and let the
* caller retry.
*/
--
2.39.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 2:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 2:53 [PATCH v4 0/8] block device fixes for large block sizes, IOCB_NOWAIT, and direct I/O Tal Zussman
2026-09-22 2:53 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] block: use iomap_dirty_folio for block devices Tal Zussman
2026-09-22 2:53 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] block: take i_rwsem for the direct I/O write fallback Tal Zussman
2026-09-22 2:54 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] block: take i_rwsem for the splice read path Tal Zussman
2026-09-22 2:54 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] block: honor IOCB_NOWAIT in the block device buffered " Tal Zussman
2026-09-22 2:54 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] block: fail a short atomic pin in bio_iov_iter_get_pages() Tal Zussman
2026-09-22 5:40 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-09-22 10:16 ` John Garry
2026-09-22 2:54 ` Tal Zussman [this message]
2026-09-22 5:41 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] block: don't fall back to buffered I/O for atomic writes Hannes Reinecke
2026-09-22 10:05 ` John Garry
2026-09-22 2:54 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] block: unpin all pages of a bvec in bio_iov_iter_align_down() Tal Zussman
2026-09-22 13:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-22 2:54 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] block: remove dead metadata handling from the async direct I/O path Tal Zussman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260921-blkdev-fixes-v4-6-e2801f71ede9@columbia.edu \
--to=tz2294@columbia.edu \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=john.garry@linux.dev \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=mkp@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®