mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>
To: Troy Mitchell <troy.mitchell@linux.dev>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] arch_topology: Parse die nodes in /cpu-map
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 12:14:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260921-rational-frisky-jerboa-0f2ff0@sudeepholla> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260920-riscv-die-topology-rfc-v1-2-071c0bf61d5f@linux.dev>

On Sun, Sep 20, 2026 at 11:18:03AM +0800, Troy Mitchell wrote:
> The devicetree CPU map can distinguish packages and clusters but cannot
> describe multiple dies in one package. Such systems have to flatten all
> clusters into the package, making cluster identifiers package-wide and
> hiding the die boundary.
> 
> Recognize an optional sequence of dieN nodes between a socket and its
> clusters, and propagate the die identifier to every CPU below it. Enumerate
> clusters independently below each die.
> 
> When a CPU map has no dieN nodes, continue parsing its existing package
> and cluster hierarchy but pass -1 as the die identifier. Legacy maps
> therefore remain compatible without being reported as an explicitly
> described die 0.
> 

Where is the associated bindings ? Am I missing to check it in the series
or it is really missing ? It is essential to add any code using the binding.

Also how does it align with ACPI implementation ? It is preferred to be
in parity here, so we need some binding there as well IMHO.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-21 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-20  3:18 [PATCH RFC 0/3] riscv: Add explicit die-level CPU topology Troy Mitchell
2026-09-20  3:18 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] arch_topology: Add a die level to " Troy Mitchell
2026-09-20  3:18 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] arch_topology: Parse die nodes in /cpu-map Troy Mitchell
2026-09-21 11:14   ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2026-09-22  8:06     ` Troy Mitchell
2026-09-20  3:18 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] riscv: topology: Expose explicit CPU die topology Troy Mitchell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260921-rational-frisky-jerboa-0f2ff0@sudeepholla \
    --to=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=pjw@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=troy.mitchell@linux.dev \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®