From: Jing Wu <realwujing@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Cc: Jing Wu <realwujing@gmail.com>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Qiliang Yuan <yuanql9@chinatelecom.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] Dynamic Housekeeping Management (DHM) via CPUSets
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 11:13:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260921031304.437934-1-realwujing@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710-wujing-dhm-v4-0-2e912e5d9645@gmail.com>
Hi all,
Gentle ping on this series - it has been quiet for a couple of months
since v4 went out, so checking whether it is stuck in a review queue
or just hasn't been picked up yet.
For context, v4 rebuilds the series around the CPU-by-CPU hotplug
cycling approach that Thomas suggested during v3 review, replacing the
RCU-swap-mask/callback mechanism from earlier versions. Patches 1-9
cover sched/isolation, tick/nohz, context_tracking, watchdog and the
cpuset driver logic; 10-11 are docs and selftests.
One thing worth flagging: v4 deliberately does not touch RCU/nocb
offload state. That piece is still being worked out in a separate,
ongoing discussion on Waiman's nohz_full/managed_irq series [1], where
the open question is how to change the nocb mask without paying a
stop_machine latency spike. We scoped it out of v4 so review of this
series would not need to wait on that RCU decision - happy to fold in
RCU/nocb support as a follow-up once that discussion converges.
Any review, even partial (a single patch or a design-level concern),
would be very helpful at this point.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260709023221.634684-1-realwujing@gmail.com
Thanks,
Jing Wu
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-21 3:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 3:28 Jing Wu
2026-07-10 3:28 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] sched/isolation: Add runtime housekeeping mask updates with boot snapshots Jing Wu
2026-07-10 3:28 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] sched/isolation: RCU-protect runtime-mutable housekeeping cpumask readers Jing Wu
2026-07-10 3:28 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] cgroup/cpuset: Drive kernel-noise housekeeping updates from isolated partitions Jing Wu
2026-07-10 3:28 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] context_tracking: allow runtime per-CPU user tracking enable/disable Jing Wu
2026-07-10 3:28 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] rcu/nocb: support lazy init for runtime CPU isolation Jing Wu
2026-07-10 3:28 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] watchdog: sync watchdog_cpumask with HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE on isolation Jing Wu
2026-07-10 3:28 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] tick/nohz: add runtime tick_nohz_full_mask update for CPU isolation Jing Wu
2026-07-10 3:28 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] cpuset: add dhm_cycling_cpus mask to suppress transient invalidation Jing Wu
2026-07-10 3:28 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] cpuset: drive kernel-noise isolation via per-CPU hotplug cycling Jing Wu
2026-07-10 3:28 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] docs: cgroup-v2: document kernel-noise isolation via isolated partitions Jing Wu
2026-07-10 3:28 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] selftests/cgroup: add kernel-noise isolation test to cpuset selftest Jing Wu
2026-09-21 3:13 ` Jing Wu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260921031304.437934-1-realwujing@gmail.com \
--to=realwujing@gmail.com \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yuanql9@chinatelecom.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®