From: Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Hangbin Liu <hangbin.liu@linux.dev>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH net v2] fou: reject omitted FOU_ATTR_IPPROTO on FOU_ENCAP_DIRECT
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 04:59:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260921045920.1613098-1-benquike@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAVpQUDwLnRfv1PkkexsC04D8wLSeARekuUDSTOenyRctWG8MA@mail.gmail.com>
Commit 7a9bc9e3f423 ("fou: Don't allow 0 for FOU_ATTR_IPPROTO.") added
NLA_POLICY_MIN(NLA_U8, 1) to fou_nl_policy[FOU_ATTR_IPPROTO], which
rejects an explicitly supplied FOU_ATTR_IPPROTO == 0 attribute with
-ERANGE.
However, FOU_ATTR_IPPROTO is an optional netlink attribute. When a user
sends FOU_CMD_ADD with FOU_ATTR_TYPE set to FOU_ENCAP_DIRECT and omits
FOU_ATTR_IPPROTO entirely, nla_policy validation succeeds and
parse_nl_config() leaves cfg->protocol as 0 (from memset(cfg, 0,
sizeof(*cfg))). fou_create() then creates a FOU_ENCAP_DIRECT socket with
fou->protocol == 0.
In fou_udp_recv(), returning -fou->protocol to udp_queue_rcv_one_skb()
triggers IP protocol resubmission when fou->protocol > 0, whereas
returning 0 tells the UDP tunnel layer that the skb was consumed without
freeing it. When fou->protocol == 0, every packet received on the socket
returns 0 from fou_udp_recv() and leaks the sk_buff.
Reject FOU_ENCAP_DIRECT when !cfg->protocol in fou_create() so that
creating a direct encapsulation port without FOU_ATTR_IPPROTO fails with
-EINVAL while leaving FOU_CMD_DEL and FOU_CMD_GET (which share
parse_nl_config()) unaffected.
Tested in QEMU against Linux 7.3.0-rc3 by sending a FOU_CMD_ADD Generic
Netlink request with FOU_ATTR_PORT = 5555 and FOU_ATTR_TYPE =
FOU_ENCAP_DIRECT while omitting FOU_ATTR_IPPROTO. On the unfixed kernel,
FOU_CMD_ADD succeeds (err = 0), FOU_CMD_GET reports fou->type = 1 and
fou->protocol = 0, and sending 4000 UDP packets to 127.0.0.1:5555 leaks
all 4000 sk_buffs (SUnreclaim in /proc/meminfo grows from 41456 kB to
59008 kB, +17552 kB); with this patch applied, FOU_CMD_ADD is rejected
with -EINVAL (-22).
Fixes: 23461551c006 ("fou: Support for foo-over-udp RX path")
Fixes: 7a9bc9e3f423 ("fou: Don't allow 0 for FOU_ATTR_IPPROTO.")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Clarify in the commit message that fou->protocol == 0 is reached on
current kernels by omitting the optional FOU_ATTR_IPPROTO attribute
when FOU_ATTR_TYPE is FOU_ENCAP_DIRECT (whereas an explicit 0
attribute is rejected by commit 7a9bc9e3f423), as noted by Kuniyuki
Iwashima and Sashiko.
- Move the !cfg->protocol check from parse_nl_config() into the
FOU_ENCAP_DIRECT branch of fou_create() so FOU_CMD_DEL and FOU_CMD_GET
are not affected, and drop the redundant check in fou_udp_recv(), as
suggested by Sashiko.
- Fix the Fixes: commit tags to 23461551c006 and 7a9bc9e3f423, as
pointed out by Hangbin Liu and Kuniyuki Iwashima.
net/ipv4/fou_core.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/fou_core.c b/net/ipv4/fou_core.c
index 5e867f1b5c1d..f30f22389283 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/fou_core.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/fou_core.c
@@ -600,6 +600,10 @@ static int fou_create(struct net *net, struct fou_cfg *cfg,
/* Initial for fou type */
switch (cfg->type) {
case FOU_ENCAP_DIRECT:
+ if (!cfg->protocol) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto error;
+ }
tunnel_cfg.encap_rcv = fou_udp_recv;
tunnel_cfg.gro_receive = fou_gro_receive;
tunnel_cfg.gro_complete = fou_gro_complete;
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-21 4:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-19 21:52 [PATCH] fou: reject FOU_ENCAP_DIRECT with protocol 0 to prevent sk_buff leak Hui Peng
2026-09-20 7:12 ` Hangbin Liu
2026-09-20 19:19 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-21 4:59 ` Hui Peng [this message]
2026-09-21 6:30 ` [PATCH net v2] fou: reject omitted FOU_ATTR_IPPROTO on FOU_ENCAP_DIRECT Hangbin Liu
2026-09-20 21:55 ` [PATCH] fou: reject FOU_ENCAP_DIRECT with protocol 0 to prevent sk_buff leak netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260921045920.1613098-1-benquike@gmail.com \
--to=benquike@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hangbin.liu@linux.dev \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®