From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com (perceval.ideasonboard.com [213.167.242.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 600A844E046; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 07:51:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.167.242.64 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789977107; cv=none; b=Wr38JXUy3G+/1ij7BTH399vX6Uh8YXImOg8Zd+h4sXgrzxxhLsK8OGsY7EldTfVyNLUtLETfduDPTp1l1iE0YErilZBmv5DyOQn7qoOEu1SthiGesf+PEpo69lVyF1tb8HWan6WPfgYu9YFzLwS0njYfUDGuMZqR6va1boPy3xI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789977107; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sZlS+5hBTeYamg0dI6hO+fZLWCFBhpnY6tKiaHd8tMY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=btNTEfa0o4ujZ2I/i7iRwJo8wjvmCq4PQqKkNCPStd+wDYljxJTXYB++uaRm5MZpSG22QKMUqaARDjJlnXIHz/kWamAL1qpY2e8+EolOBv6PFJA5AKJYyk4DVwD5J581j1uFSO/UuL76b3tbltk4im2wx/wKyqFyde8MPG78HCg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=ideasonboard.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ideasonboard.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ideasonboard.com header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.b=L+sK7M1R; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.167.242.64 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=ideasonboard.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ideasonboard.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ideasonboard.com header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.b="L+sK7M1R" Received: from killaraus.ideasonboard.com (2001-14ba-70f3-e800--a06.rev.dnainternet.fi [IPv6:2001:14ba:70f3:e800::a06]) by perceval.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 282A7153F; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 09:49:58 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ideasonboard.com; s=mail; t=1789976998; bh=sZlS+5hBTeYamg0dI6hO+fZLWCFBhpnY6tKiaHd8tMY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=L+sK7M1R0d3rjmIkUs23v4Y91mzJ9bHr8jjSxwK4aS2qXXoFtQHYCrGWRjnz0Byzx vNNimR4pBTHeG7SeHma/holVeUOWYrcU/oa6HMGMPLxwPNoAXKe5uYt2P4THeDt+p7 QcgTtPmdb0AhxJaj4n835+aHRKYh3D1CTLc0YuqE= Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 10:51:41 +0300 From: Laurent Pinchart To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Paul Elder , Stephen Boyd , Brian Masney , Jerome Brunet , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Magnus Damm , Ulf Hansson , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Philipp Zabel , Kieran Bingham , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH DNI v2 00/11] media: rcar-fcp, vsp1: Enable on R-Car X5H Message-ID: <20260921075141.GF24505@killaraus.ideasonboard.com> References: <20260919-epaul-v7-3-rc1-x5h-vsp-fcp-v2-0-dbe9236bfd22@ideasonboard.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hi Geert, On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 09:41:10AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Fri, 18 Sept 2026 at 19:07, Paul Elder wrote: > > This series is based on Geert's > > "topic/rcar-x5h-ironhide-scmi-cpg-mdlc-remapping-v3" branch [0]. A > > branch including this series is available here [1]. > > > > This series enables the FCPV{B,I,D} and the VSP{B,I,D} blocks on the Renesas > > R-Car X5H SoC. > > > > This has been tested on an Ironhide with the vsp-tests test suite [2]. > > VSPI: > > 145 tests: 138 passed, 0 failed, 7 skipped > > VSPB: > > 115 tests: 104 passed, 0 failed, 11 skipped > > VSPD (a): > > 114 tests: 99 passed, 0 failed, 15 skipped > > > > VSPD (b) hangs on the tests, so that needs some investigation. > > > > The first couple patches add clocks that are used by the FCP and VSP, > > but as the upstream X5H CPG driver is barebones at the moment and we > > don't yet ensure that the parents are enabled, these are marked as DNI > > for the moment. > > The DTS patches use DNI definitions of clocks, so they should be DNI, too. Can we add non-DNI clock definitions in v3, or is that too early in the grand scheme of MDLC and SCMI development ? -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart