From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Mete Durlu <meted@linux.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Juergen Christ <jchrist@linux.ibm.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/11] s390/percpu: Rework to simplify percpu_entry() and percpu_exit()
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 10:55:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260921105518.26f3dcf7@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260921084005.4022574-12-hca@linux.ibm.com>
On Mon, 21 Sep 2026 10:40:05 +0200
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> The percpu code section functionality uses a rather complex method to
> figure out if the register, which contains the address of the current
> cpu's percpu variable, needs to be adjusted.
>
> If an interrupt happens within a percpu code section (indicated by a
> lowcore field), the instruction at the interrupted location is
> checked. If it is not a specific AG instruction, the register needs to
> be updated. This mechanism needs to take kprobes into account, and
> enforces a specific instruction ordering.
>
> Mark Rutland provided a different solution for arm64 [1] which comes
> without such limitations, but requires to use one more instruction, and
> two more registers. Given that this simplifies percpu_entry() and
> percpu_exit() it seems to be worth to go that route.
>
> Change s390 to implement a similar approach. This requires to encode
> three register numbers into the "percpu_register" field, which is used
> to indicate if a percpu code section is executed.
>
> The used mviy instruction can write only one byte, which allows to
> encode only two register numbers. Use a register pair for the inline
> assemblies, and only encode the even register number of the register
> pair to work around this.
>
> The generated code changes like this for e.g. a simple this_cpu_inc():
>
> Old:
>
> c0 20 00 00 00 00 larl %r2,c6 <foo+0x6> <-- load address of percpu var
> b9 04 00 32 lgr %r3,%r2 <-- pointless copy of address
> eb 03 03 c0 00 52 mviy 960,3 <-- start of percpu code section
> - gpr 3 contains percpu var address
> e3 30 03 b8 00 08 ag %r3,952 <-- add percpu offset
> eb 01 30 00 00 7a agsi 0(%r3),1 <-- atomic inc
> eb 00 03 c0 00 52 mviy 960,0 <-- end of percpu code section
>
> New:
>
> c0 10 00 00 00 00 larl %r1,c6 <foo+0x6> <-- load address of percpu var
> eb 21 03 c0 00 52 mviy 960,33 <-- start of percpu code section
> 33 == 0x21:
> - gpr 1 contains percpu var address
> - gpr 2 used for percpu offset
> - gpr 2+1 == 3 used for current cpu's percpu var address
> e3 20 03 b8 00 04 lg %r2,952 <-- load percpu offset
> 41 32 10 00 la %r3,0(%r2,%r1) <-- generate current cpu's percpu var address
> eb 01 30 00 00 7a agsi 0(%r3),1 <-- atomic inc
> eb 00 03 c0 00 52 mviy 960,0 <-- end of percpu code section
>
> In the above "new" code example 33 (0x21) is used as indicator value to
> mark that a percpu code section is executed. This value implies that
> registers 2 and 3 will (only) hold the percpu offset and the current
> cpu's percpu var address. Those registers will be updated by
> percpu_exit() if the process was migrated to a different cpu to contain
> the percpu offset and percpu var address of the new cpu.
>
> Note that because of the pointless lgr instruction in the "old" code
> example the two code sequences have identical size, and it looks like
> only one more register is used. However this is because of suboptimal
> gcc code generation.
In both cases the register dependency chain length is 3 (ignoring the
pointless lgr) so the execution time is likely to be the same.
...
> + regpcp = FIELD_GET(PCPU_REG_PCP, regval);
> + regoff = FIELD_GET(PCPU_REG_OFF, regval);
...
> +#define PCPU_REG_PCP_SHIFT 0
> +#define PCPU_REG_PCP GENMASK(3, 0)
> +#define PCPU_REG_OFF_SHIFT 4
> +#define PCPU_REG_OFF GENMASK(7, 4)
...
> +#define __PCPU_CALC_REGVAL(regpcp, regoff) \
> + "(" regpcp " << " __stringify(PCPU_REG_PCP_SHIFT) ") |" \
> + "(" regoff " << " __stringify(PCPU_REG_OFF_SHIFT) ")"
I'm not a big fan of GENMASK() + FIELD_GET() and I'm not at all sure it
really helps here.
Maybe:
regpcp = (regval >> PCPU_REG_PCP_SHIFT) & 15;
regoff = (regval >> PCPU_REG_OFF_SHIFT) & 15;
Which at least uses the same constants for encode and decode.
But I might just comment that the pcp register is in the high nibble
(twice) and remove the 'crud'.
#define __PCPU_CALC_REGVAL(regpcp, regoff) "(" regpcp " << 4 ) | " regoff
regpcp = regval >> 4;
regoff = regval & 15;
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-21 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-21 8:39 [PATCH v3 00/11] s390: More this_cpu_*() changes Heiko Carstens
2026-09-21 8:39 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] s390/percpu: Fix comment typo Heiko Carstens
2026-09-21 8:39 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] s390/percpu: Add sanity check to GEN_MVIY macro Heiko Carstens
2026-09-21 8:39 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] s390/lowcore: Remove _AC() from LOWCORE_ALT_ADDRESS Heiko Carstens
2026-09-21 8:39 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] s390/percpu: Let MVIY_PERCPU() calculate alternative displacement Heiko Carstens
2026-09-21 8:39 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] s390/percpu/lowcore: Add and use LC_PERCPU lowcore offset defines Heiko Carstens
2026-09-21 8:40 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] s390/percpu: Rename inline assembly symbolic names Heiko Carstens
2026-09-21 8:40 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] s390/percpu: Use __PCPU_BEGIN() and __PCPU_END() for inline assemblies Heiko Carstens
2026-09-21 8:40 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] s390/percpu: Use percpu code section for this_cpu_cmpxchg128() Heiko Carstens
2026-09-21 8:40 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] s390/percpu: Use percpu code section for this_cpu_xchg() Heiko Carstens
2026-09-21 8:40 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] s390/percpu: Use percpu code section for this_cpu_cmpxchg() Heiko Carstens
2026-09-21 8:40 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] s390/percpu: Rework to simplify percpu_entry() and percpu_exit() Heiko Carstens
2026-09-21 9:55 ` David Laight [this message]
2026-09-21 10:07 ` Mark Rutland
2026-09-21 10:17 ` Heiko Carstens
2026-09-21 9:15 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] s390: More this_cpu_*() changes Heiko Carstens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260921105518.26f3dcf7@pumpkin \
--to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jchrist@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=meted@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®