From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: "syzbot" <syzbot@kernel.org>
Cc: syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
Krystian Kaniewski <krystianmkaniewski@gmail.com>,
<linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
"Vincent Donnefort" <vdonnefort@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
syzbot@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ring-buffer: Fix false warning in ring_buffer_map_get_reader()
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 11:12:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260921111230.14e63f21@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15bc282f-669e-4a94-911d-bb435513461f@mail.kernel.org>
On Fri, 18 Sep 2026 14:34:25 +0000 (UTC)
"syzbot" <syzbot@kernel.org> wrote:
> From: Krystian Kaniewski <krystianmkaniewski@gmail.com>
>
> In ring_buffer_map_get_reader(), an unconditional WARN_ON(!reader) is
> triggered when rb_get_reader_page() returns NULL:
>
> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5906 at kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:7998
> ring_buffer_map_get_reader+0x940/0x9d0
> CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 5906 Comm: task Not tainted
> RIP: 0010:ring_buffer_map_get_reader+0x940/0x9d0
> kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:7998
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> tracing_buffers_ioctl+0x258/0x300 kernel/trace/trace.c:7381
> __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:583
> do_syscall_64+0x166/0x520 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:84
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
> </TASK>
>
> This warning is triggered due to a race between a writer committing events
> and a reader mapping the ring buffer via TRACE_MMAP_IOCTL_GET_READER. When
> a writer commits an event in rb_set_commit_to_write(), it advances
> cpu_buffer->commit_page to cpu_buffer->tail_page in its first loop before
> updating the commit counter (commit_page->page->commit) in the second loop.
> If a reader invokes ring_buffer_map_get_reader() at this moment, the
> initial check cpu_buffer->reader_page == cpu_buffer->commit_page is false,
> and it calls rb_get_reader_page(). Inside __rb_get_reader_page(), the
> reader swaps reader_page with the head page (which is the new commit_page).
> Because the writer has not yet updated the commit count on the new page,
> rb_page_size() is zero and reader_page->read < rb_page_size() evaluates to
> false. __rb_get_reader_page() then checks if cpu_buffer->commit_page ==
> cpu_buffer->reader_page. Since both now point to the swapped page, the
> condition evaluates to true and rb_get_reader_page() legitimately returns
> NULL to indicate the reader caught up to the writer.
The above looks like AI output. Please summarize the issue in a human
readable format. The above is not acceptable as a change log.
>
> Furthermore, rb_get_reader_page() can legitimately return NULL when there
> is no data to read. Re-checking mutable writer state such as
> cpu_buffer->reader_page != cpu_buffer->commit_page is insufficient because
> a writer on another CPU can advance commit_page before the check is
> evaluated without being stopped by reader_lock.
The above can use some loving too.
-- Steve
>
> Because WARN_ON must not be used for conditions that can legitimately
> happen, and pr_err should be used instead if necessary, remove the
> WARN_ON() entirely since returning NULL here is an expected condition.
>
> Fixes: 117c39200d9d ("ring-buffer: Introducing ring-buffer mapping functions")
> Assisted-by: Gemini:gemini-3.8-flash syzbot
> Reported-by: syzbot+de3d7f9bcc9212f3fae1@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=de3d7f9bcc9212f3fae1
> Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/ai_job?id=488adc18-a10e-42d2-a205-25327c38837f
> Signed-off-by: Krystian Kaniewski <krystianmkaniewski@gmail.com>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-21 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 14:34 syzbot
2026-09-21 8:12 ` Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-21 14:26 ` Krystian Kaniewski
2026-09-21 15:12 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260921111230.14e63f21@fedora \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=krystianmkaniewski@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot@kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®