From: Baorui.Liu <baorliu@amd.com>
To: <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: <lenb@kernel.org>, <robert.moore@intel.com>,
<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<acpica-devel@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Baorui.Liu <baorliu@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4] ACPI: button: Report wakeup key only for power button wakeups
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 10:42:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260922024232.816-1-baorliu@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260917143116.445-1-baorliu@amd.com>
The ACPI button driver reports KEY_WAKEUP from the Power Button input
device to let userspace know that the system was resumed by a power
button wakeup.
However, reporting KEY_WAKEUP from generic system resume paths can make
userspace observe a Power Button wakeup even when the system was resumed
by a different wake source.
This is reproducible on an AMD Android 15 Xen guest. With a kernel
without this fix, a non-power-button S3 resume:
echo mem > /sys/power/state
xl trigger android s3resume
makes the Power Button input device report KEY_WAKEUP. The same test on
a kernel with this fix no longer reports KEY_WAKEUP from the Power Button
input device.
Track whether a power button event/notify is observed while the ACPI
button device is suspended, and report KEY_WAKEUP on resume only in that
case.
When the fixed power-button status bit is set during early S3 resume,
clear it to avoid a deferred KEY_POWER delivery to userspace, and mark
wakeup_pending so button resume can still report KEY_WAKEUP. Also clear
wakeup_pending before setting suspended to avoid a race with a power
button SCI during suspend entry.
Signed-off-by: Baorui.Liu <baorliu@amd.com>
---
drivers/acpi/button.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/acpi/sleep.c | 27 +++++++++++--------------
include/acpi/button.h | 5 +++++
3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/button.c b/drivers/acpi/button.c
index cdbb1023a8ee..c07de417df5d 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/button.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/button.c
@@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ struct acpi_button {
bool last_state;
ktime_t last_time;
bool suspended;
+ bool wakeup_pending;
bool lid_state_initialized;
bool gpe_enabled;
};
@@ -397,6 +398,34 @@ static void acpi_lid_forget(struct acpi_device *adev)
}
/* Driver Interface */
+/**
+ * acpi_button_power_wakeup_pending - Mark fixed power button wakeup pending.
+ *
+ * Used when the fixed power-button status bit is observed and cleared during
+ * early S3 resume, so KEY_WAKEUP can still be reported from button resume
+ * without delivering a deferred KEY_POWER to userspace.
+ */
+void acpi_button_power_wakeup_pending(void)
+{
+ struct acpi_device *adev;
+ struct device *phys_dev;
+ struct acpi_button *button;
+
+ adev = acpi_dev_get_first_match_dev(ACPI_BUTTON_HID_POWERF, NULL, -1);
+ if (!adev)
+ return;
+
+ phys_dev = acpi_get_first_physical_node(adev);
+ if (phys_dev) {
+ button = dev_get_drvdata(phys_dev);
+ if (button && button->type == ACPI_BUTTON_TYPE_POWER)
+ button->wakeup_pending = true;
+ }
+
+ acpi_dev_put(adev);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_button_power_wakeup_pending);
+
int acpi_lid_open(void)
{
guard(mutex)(&acpi_lid_lock);
@@ -476,6 +505,9 @@ static void acpi_button_notify(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *data)
acpi_pm_wakeup_event(button->dev);
+ if (button->type == ACPI_BUTTON_TYPE_POWER && button->suspended)
+ button->wakeup_pending = true;
+
if (button->suspended || event == ACPI_BUTTON_NOTIFY_WAKE)
return;
@@ -498,6 +530,11 @@ static void acpi_button_notify_run(void *data)
static u32 acpi_button_event(void *data)
{
+ struct acpi_button *button = data;
+
+ if (button->type == ACPI_BUTTON_TYPE_POWER && button->suspended)
+ button->wakeup_pending = true;
+
acpi_os_execute(OSL_NOTIFY_HANDLER, acpi_button_notify_run, data);
return ACPI_INTERRUPT_HANDLED;
}
@@ -507,6 +544,12 @@ static int acpi_button_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
struct acpi_button *button = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ /*
+ * Clear wakeup_pending before marking suspended. Otherwise a power
+ * button SCI between the two stores could set wakeup_pending and then
+ * be overwritten here, losing a real wakeup.
+ */
+ button->wakeup_pending = false;
button->suspended = true;
return 0;
}
@@ -523,12 +566,13 @@ static int acpi_button_resume(struct device *dev)
acpi_lid_initialize_state(button);
}
- if (button->type == ACPI_BUTTON_TYPE_POWER) {
+ if (button->type == ACPI_BUTTON_TYPE_POWER && button->wakeup_pending) {
input = button->input;
input_report_key(input, KEY_WAKEUP, 1);
input_sync(input);
input_report_key(input, KEY_WAKEUP, 0);
input_sync(input);
+ button->wakeup_pending = false;
}
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
index 132a9df98471..30e268987e37 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
#include <trace/events/power.h>
+#include <acpi/button.h>
#include "internal.h"
#include "sleep.h"
@@ -504,12 +505,11 @@ static void acpi_pm_finish(void)
acpi_resume_power_resources();
- /* If we were woken with the fixed power button, provide a small
- * hint to userspace in the form of a wakeup event on the fixed power
- * button device (if it can be found).
- *
- * We delay the event generation til now, as the PM layer requires
- * timekeeping to be running before we generate events. */
+ /*
+ * If woken by the fixed power button, provide a wakeup event on that
+ * device. KEY_WAKEUP input reporting is handled by the button driver
+ * via wakeup_pending; do not synthesize KEY_POWER here.
+ */
if (!pwr_btn_event_pending)
return;
@@ -626,14 +626,11 @@ static int acpi_suspend_enter(suspend_state_t pm_state)
/* Reprogram control registers */
acpi_leave_sleep_state_prep(acpi_state);
- /* ACPI 3.0 specs (P62) says that it's the responsibility
- * of the OSPM to clear the status bit [ implying that the
- * POWER_BUTTON event should not reach userspace ]
- *
- * However, we do generate a small hint for userspace in the form of
- * a wakeup event. We flag this condition for now and generate the
- * event later, as we're currently too early in resume to be able to
- * generate wakeup events.
+ /*
+ * ACPI 3.0 (P62): OSPM should clear the fixed power-button status bit
+ * so the event does not reach userspace as KEY_POWER. Remember that a
+ * power-button wake occurred so button resume can report KEY_WAKEUP
+ * and acpi_pm_finish() can emit a PM wakeup event.
*/
if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status) && (acpi_state == ACPI_STATE_S3)) {
acpi_event_status pwr_btn_status = ACPI_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLED;
@@ -642,8 +639,8 @@ static int acpi_suspend_enter(suspend_state_t pm_state)
if (pwr_btn_status & ACPI_EVENT_FLAG_STATUS_SET) {
acpi_clear_event(ACPI_EVENT_POWER_BUTTON);
- /* Flag for later */
pwr_btn_event_pending = true;
+ acpi_button_power_wakeup_pending();
}
}
diff --git a/include/acpi/button.h b/include/acpi/button.h
index af2fce5d2ee3..213c6cfd0264 100644
--- a/include/acpi/button.h
+++ b/include/acpi/button.h
@@ -8,11 +8,16 @@
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_BUTTON)
extern int acpi_lid_open(void);
+extern void acpi_button_power_wakeup_pending(void);
#else
static inline int acpi_lid_open(void)
{
return 1;
}
+
+static inline void acpi_button_power_wakeup_pending(void)
+{
+}
#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_BUTTON) */
#endif /* ACPI_BUTTON_H */
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 2:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-06 12:27 [PATCH] " Baorui Liu
2026-08-07 14:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-08-19 8:55 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " Baorui.Liu
2026-08-19 8:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Baorui.Liu
2026-09-09 14:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-09-17 14:31 ` [PATCH v3] " Baorui.Liu
2026-09-18 14:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-09-22 2:42 ` Baorui.Liu [this message]
2026-08-20 7:07 ` [PATCH] " kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260922024232.816-1-baorliu@amd.com \
--to=baorliu@amd.com \
--cc=acpica-devel@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®