From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail11.truemail.it (mail11.truemail.it [217.194.8.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2B0938C40E; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 14:46:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.194.8.81 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790088404; cv=none; b=bzz6TjRe8cg0G9muiBc3iWkWMwrv0T20HXsS3WMvhb1BdsbWm7unVV8hWVXGC22solU2l00SsBHIJ+RM4DDAjppJhO1iXpxaAU++4sl4woNrSG8NdP+eL7GUZ6qzLaUGDL60CuvKfoERO3XgaWTkiydUQne5NBiMOYYp/ndhR7k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790088404; c=relaxed/simple; bh=TeMD9tmKHnutvDUoBsUuFyCg9NqLgIpIv+F2ZrtL3wQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=hrcCNemGauBGF13aUpJF64bADi/QcaQ8kST4ktAP1URfR/tARodiks3Hx1BLkkCe75yDJbHMlZBq1vqFUKx7wWw2Ii/1r7C5NVMnOEy2uZHeDLpnDiJCYSj0FVcv1Fq2USjdb3AuU0BQl0KwBeslgd6uy+Y1TfFk1ZFf2pIoEK8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=dolcini.it; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dolcini.it; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dolcini.it header.i=@dolcini.it header.b=famrD2QC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.194.8.81 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=dolcini.it Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dolcini.it Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dolcini.it header.i=@dolcini.it header.b="famrD2QC" Received: from francesco-nb (93-49-2-63.ip317.fastwebnet.it [93.49.2.63]) by mail11.truemail.it (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D364C1FF51; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 16:46:31 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dolcini.it; s=default; t=1790088392; bh=OR+9VrcmpwsXDYLq7teC1AZo8u5HWqbjnSTYJJq8cqM=; h=From:To:Subject; b=famrD2QCP+T9APJzB+FUkhLM+aPRp2vI1jQt+UEpitwkXLXLH4iHYZMNHNPQDblwi q+EpmY/IxzwdAOyp8sioYMZqpH7LZFmHg5CneLX+OpSB7z/t7Wl4i28+9Cshvbq07e 8x3AvM7I3mYTg3U4V0r3IMPG0w8d/FHWen61Tqm8GJujONo2PURYbX9JSOSdKCxJxO Mw5k6nuCtSJE/5JA0z3Yi15gFpH9Ub8yTuSGdjh4v+rPWfrYnAh+TrwuJ3qHd+Gxrb +tn1ZZiDAUuSPYenqEqi5f3A8VkVpYiLcHfYhHLvQe08ZPF1pXPXS0oVULwjO3r7P0 r8jwB+nvkvwxA== Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 16:46:28 +0200 From: Francesco Dolcini To: Nishanth Menon Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra , Tero Kristo , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Francesco Dolcini , Francesco Dolcini , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62-verdin: fix main_gpio0/main_gpio1 line names size Message-ID: <20260922144628.GA261268@francesco-nb> References: <20260914190943.50843-1-francesco@dolcini.it> <179008726793.4044824.6786355019611253673.b4-ty@b4> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <179008726793.4044824.6786355019611253673.b4-ty@b4> Hello Nishanth, On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 09:29:48AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On Mon, 14 Sep 2026 21:09:42 +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > > gpio-line-names sized main_gpio0/main_gpio1 for 87/88 lines, the SoC's > > ti,ngpio values before they were corrected to 92/52 in commit > > 28c8f2189d80 ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62-main: Fix GPIO numbers in DT"), > > four months before this file was written. Resize both arrays to match, > > keeping every existing label at its original index. > > > > > > [...] > > I have applied the following to branch ti-k3-dts-next on [1]. > > I have assumed you'd not want this fix for ivy/zinnia which redefines > the gpio-line-names. Let me know if that is not the case or if additional > fixes are needed. I missed them, I'll send 2 more patches to fix it. Thanks for the head-up, appreciated. Francesco