From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
davem@davemloft.net, stable@vger.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, srk@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] crypto: sa2ul - Fix stack overflow in sa_prepare_iopads
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 22:16:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260923051633.GF42709@sol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <beba08cf-3e1d-4510-9498-d126482cdaa2@ti.com>
On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 06:33:51PM +0530, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> On 9/16/26 2:30 PM, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 11:21:38AM +0530, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> > >
> > > Since crypto_shash_export() writes 105 bytes into this 104-byte union, it
> > > overflows by one byte into the adjacent stack frame.
> >
> > This should be converted to crypto_shash_export_core which exports
> > just the hash state without the partial block buffer.
> > > Changes since v1:
> > > - Propagated error from sa_prepare_iopads throughout the call chain.
> > > - Added missing check for authentication key size being within limits.
> > > Above changes are based on Sashiko review of the v1 patch at:
> > > https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260819142357.3950463-1-s-vadapalli%40ti.com
> >
> > Looks like Sashiko is still not happy:
> >
> > https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260831055141.1632832-1-s-vadapalli%40ti.com
> >
> > Let's split this up. Just do a one-liner to switch shash_export
> > to shash_export_core, that should fix the stack overrun. Then
> > fix the long key issue in a separate patch.
> >
> > I think you should support long keys properly by hashing them as
> > crypto/hmac.c does.
>
> Thank you for reviewing the patch and providing your valuable feedback.
>
> I will split the patch as you have suggested with the one-line fix patch
> posted first followed by an independent patch posted later for handling long
> keys.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20260923051116.92741-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
fixes both bugs properly by using the crypto library instead. There's
really no need to even consider workarounds using crypto_shash here.
- Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-23 5:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 5:51 Siddharth Vadapalli
2026-09-16 9:00 ` Herbert Xu
2026-09-22 13:03 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2026-09-23 5:16 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260923051633.GF42709@sol \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s-vadapalli@ti.com \
--cc=srk@ti.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®