mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Xin Xie <xiexinet@gmail.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, shuah@kernel.org, kees@kernel.org,
	petr.wozniak@gmail.com, qingfang.deng@linux.dev,
	fmaurer@redhat.com, luka.gejak@linux.dev,
	xiaoliang.yang_1@nxp.com, skhawaja@google.com,
	liuhangbin@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	sdf.kernel@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] net: hsr: fix packet drops caused by GRO superpackets
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 12:32:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260923103238.cg3tr_40@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c09a44a-19d9-43f5-a852-12f5b6579641@gmail.com>

On 2026-09-19 01:46:34 [+0200], Xin Xie wrote:
> On 14/08/2026 03:21, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > 1) could you explain in more detail why GRO is breaking things?
> > GRO shouldn't merge packets with different L2/L2.5 and packets
> > with trailers?
> The reproducer is plain SAN traffic entering a PRP RedBox's
> interlink: matching Ethernet headers, no RCT yet, so GRO can merge it.
> PRP then appends one RCT to the aggregate, using its length for
> LSDU_size and assigning one sequence number. If the aggregate LSDU
> exceeds 4095, the 12-bit field truncates it. Later TCP segmentation
> cannot generate per-segment RCTs. An aggregate left unsegmented may
> instead be dropped for exceeding the lower device's frame-size limit.
> Our wire captures showed segments without RCTs and duplicate delivery
> through the two LANs.Disabling interlink GRO raised single-stream TCP 
> throughput from 27-37 Mbit/s to about 94 Mbit/s on the 100 Mbit/s rig.
> 
> > 2) the code seems inspired by LRO but LRO also has
> > NETIF_F_UPPER_DISABLES. This change looks rather incomplete.
> > Calling it "best effort" seems like an excuse.
> NETIF_F_UPPER_DISABLES prevents a lower's ethtool request from
> overriding an upper's LRO-off policy. GRO is outside that mask and
> remains changeable; extending the global mask would affect other
> stacked devices too. Patch 1 sets the GRO-off default, while patch 3
> segments plain, trailer-free aggregates before tagging, including
> when GRO is re-enabled or GSO arrives directly. GRO_HW can also be
> fixed on, so feature disabling alone cannot exclude all aggregates;
> device-specific hardware-coalesced formats remain outside v6's
> segmentation guarantee. I should have explained this distinction
> from LRO explicitly.

Would adding a NETIF_F_HSR_SLAVE flag to slave device(s) and then filter
invalid flags in netdev_fix_features() fix this? This should help
against enabling and add a warning if a flag can not be removed.

A netdev_change_features() might do the job then.

Sebastian

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-23 10:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-09 12:14 [PATCH net v6 0/4] net: hsr: fix GRO/GSO super-packet handling Xin Xie
2026-08-09 12:14 ` [PATCH 1/4] net: hsr: fix packet drops caused by GRO superpackets Xin Xie
2026-08-14  1:21   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-17 15:38     ` Xin Xie
2026-09-18 23:46     ` Xin Xie
2026-09-23 10:32       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2026-08-09 12:14 ` [PATCH 2/4] net: hsr: shrink seqnr_lock to sequence counter updates Xin Xie
2026-08-10  2:23   ` Hangbin Liu
2026-09-23 10:37   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-08-09 12:14 ` [PATCH 3/4] net: hsr: unfold GSO super-packets at the forward entry Xin Xie
2026-09-23 10:43   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-08-09 12:14 ` [PATCH 4/4] selftests: net: hsr: cover GSO super-packets on PRP slave ingress Xin Xie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260923103238.cg3tr_40@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fmaurer@redhat.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
    --cc=luka.gejak@linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=petr.wozniak@gmail.com \
    --cc=qingfang.deng@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhawaja@google.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoliang.yang_1@nxp.com \
    --cc=xiexinet@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®