From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Xin Xie <xiexinet@gmail.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, shuah@kernel.org, kees@kernel.org,
petr.wozniak@gmail.com, qingfang.deng@linux.dev,
fmaurer@redhat.com, luka.gejak@linux.dev,
xiaoliang.yang_1@nxp.com, skhawaja@google.com,
liuhangbin@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
sdf.kernel@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] net: hsr: fix packet drops caused by GRO superpackets
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 12:32:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260923103238.cg3tr_40@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c09a44a-19d9-43f5-a852-12f5b6579641@gmail.com>
On 2026-09-19 01:46:34 [+0200], Xin Xie wrote:
> On 14/08/2026 03:21, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > 1) could you explain in more detail why GRO is breaking things?
> > GRO shouldn't merge packets with different L2/L2.5 and packets
> > with trailers?
> The reproducer is plain SAN traffic entering a PRP RedBox's
> interlink: matching Ethernet headers, no RCT yet, so GRO can merge it.
> PRP then appends one RCT to the aggregate, using its length for
> LSDU_size and assigning one sequence number. If the aggregate LSDU
> exceeds 4095, the 12-bit field truncates it. Later TCP segmentation
> cannot generate per-segment RCTs. An aggregate left unsegmented may
> instead be dropped for exceeding the lower device's frame-size limit.
> Our wire captures showed segments without RCTs and duplicate delivery
> through the two LANs.Disabling interlink GRO raised single-stream TCP
> throughput from 27-37 Mbit/s to about 94 Mbit/s on the 100 Mbit/s rig.
>
> > 2) the code seems inspired by LRO but LRO also has
> > NETIF_F_UPPER_DISABLES. This change looks rather incomplete.
> > Calling it "best effort" seems like an excuse.
> NETIF_F_UPPER_DISABLES prevents a lower's ethtool request from
> overriding an upper's LRO-off policy. GRO is outside that mask and
> remains changeable; extending the global mask would affect other
> stacked devices too. Patch 1 sets the GRO-off default, while patch 3
> segments plain, trailer-free aggregates before tagging, including
> when GRO is re-enabled or GSO arrives directly. GRO_HW can also be
> fixed on, so feature disabling alone cannot exclude all aggregates;
> device-specific hardware-coalesced formats remain outside v6's
> segmentation guarantee. I should have explained this distinction
> from LRO explicitly.
Would adding a NETIF_F_HSR_SLAVE flag to slave device(s) and then filter
invalid flags in netdev_fix_features() fix this? This should help
against enabling and add a warning if a flag can not be removed.
A netdev_change_features() might do the job then.
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-23 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-09 12:14 [PATCH net v6 0/4] net: hsr: fix GRO/GSO super-packet handling Xin Xie
2026-08-09 12:14 ` [PATCH 1/4] net: hsr: fix packet drops caused by GRO superpackets Xin Xie
2026-08-14 1:21 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-17 15:38 ` Xin Xie
2026-09-18 23:46 ` Xin Xie
2026-09-23 10:32 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2026-08-09 12:14 ` [PATCH 2/4] net: hsr: shrink seqnr_lock to sequence counter updates Xin Xie
2026-08-10 2:23 ` Hangbin Liu
2026-09-23 10:37 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-08-09 12:14 ` [PATCH 3/4] net: hsr: unfold GSO super-packets at the forward entry Xin Xie
2026-09-23 10:43 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-08-09 12:14 ` [PATCH 4/4] selftests: net: hsr: cover GSO super-packets on PRP slave ingress Xin Xie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260923103238.cg3tr_40@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fmaurer@redhat.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=luka.gejak@linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=petr.wozniak@gmail.com \
--cc=qingfang.deng@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiaoliang.yang_1@nxp.com \
--cc=xiexinet@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®