mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net v11 08/17] rxrpc: Fix error handling in rxrpc_send_data()
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 14:36:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260923133706.1496540-9-dhowells@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260923133706.1496540-1-dhowells@redhat.com>

Fix the error handling in rxrpc_send_data() so that it doesn't return an
error if it has successfully queued the last packet of a call, but the call
has seen to have completed after it did that.  Rather, leave it to
recvmsg() to report the completion (which it will do anyway).

The problem with trying to report the error twice is that the caller may
try to clean up the dead call twice.

Further, if we haven't queued the final packet yet, return -ESHUTDOWN if
the call is now marked complete (e.g. it got aborted by the peer) as
there's no point sendmsg() continuing to try to add data to a call if it is
defunct.  The application should abort the call and then call recvmsg() to
pick up the reason.

Fixes: 4ba68c519255 ("rxrpc: Return an error to sendmsg if call failed")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
 fs/afs/rxrpc.c      |  11 +++--
 net/rxrpc/rxperf.c  |  29 +++++++----
 net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 3 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/afs/rxrpc.c b/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
index c38458157ecc..0b9027549580 100644
--- a/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
+++ b/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
@@ -448,13 +448,14 @@ void afs_make_call(struct afs_call *call, gfp_t gfp)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	if (ret == -ECONNABORTED) {
+	if (ret == -ESHUTDOWN) {
 		len = 0;
 		iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_DEST, NULL, 0, 0);
-		rxrpc_kernel_recv_data(call->net->socket, rxcall,
-				       &msg.msg_iter, &len, false,
-				       &call->abort_code, &call->service_id);
-		call->responded = true;
+		ret = rxrpc_kernel_recv_data(call->net->socket, rxcall,
+					     &msg.msg_iter, &len, false,
+					     &call->abort_code, &call->service_id);
+		if (ret == -ECONNABORTED)
+			call->responded = true;
 	}
 	call->error = ret;
 	trace_afs_call_done(call);
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/rxperf.c b/net/rxrpc/rxperf.c
index 823eedc5d16f..5042e8bfca55 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/rxperf.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/rxperf.c
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static struct workqueue_struct *rxperf_workqueue;
 static void rxperf_deliver_to_call(struct work_struct *work);
 static int rxperf_deliver_param_block(struct rxperf_call *call);
 static int rxperf_deliver_request(struct rxperf_call *call);
-static int rxperf_process_call(struct rxperf_call *call);
+static void rxperf_process_call(struct rxperf_call *call);
 static void rxperf_charge_preallocation(struct work_struct *work);
 
 static DECLARE_WORK(rxperf_charge_preallocation_work,
@@ -293,18 +293,28 @@ static void rxperf_deliver_to_call(struct work_struct *work)
 	       state == RXPERF_CALL_SV_AWAIT_ACK
 	       ) {
 		if (state == RXPERF_CALL_SV_AWAIT_ACK) {
-			if (!rxrpc_kernel_check_life(rxperf_socket, call->rxcall))
+			size_t len = 0;
+			iov_iter_kvec(&call->iter, ITER_DEST, NULL, 0, 0);
+			ret = rxrpc_kernel_recv_data(rxperf_socket,
+						     call->rxcall, &call->iter,
+						     &len, false, &remote_abort,
+						     &call->service_id);
+
+			if (ret == -EINPROGRESS || ret == -EAGAIN)
+				return;
+			if (ret < 0 || ret == 1) {
+				if (ret == 1)
+					ret = 0;
 				goto call_complete;
+			}
 			return;
 		}
 
 		ret = call->deliver(call);
-		if (ret == 0)
-			ret = rxperf_process_call(call);
-
 		switch (ret) {
 		case 0:
-			continue;
+			rxperf_process_call(call);
+			return;
 		case -EINPROGRESS:
 		case -EAGAIN:
 			return;
@@ -496,7 +506,7 @@ static int rxperf_deliver_request(struct rxperf_call *call)
 /*
  * Process a call for which we've received the request.
  */
-static int rxperf_process_call(struct rxperf_call *call)
+static void rxperf_process_call(struct rxperf_call *call)
 {
 	struct msghdr msg = {};
 	struct bio_vec bv;
@@ -527,11 +537,11 @@ static int rxperf_process_call(struct rxperf_call *call)
 	ret = rxrpc_kernel_send_data(rxperf_socket, call->rxcall, &msg,
 				     rxperf_notify_end_reply_tx);
 	if (ret == 0)
-		return 0;
+		return;
+
 send_error:
 	rxrpc_kernel_abort_call(rxperf_socket, call->rxcall, RXGEN_SS_MARSHAL,
 				ret, rxperf_abort_send_error);
-	return ret;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -684,4 +694,3 @@ static void __exit rxperf_exit(void)
 	rcu_barrier();
 }
 module_exit(rxperf_exit);
-
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c b/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
index 312be27ca75b..80c6afc64787 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
@@ -324,19 +324,10 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
 	__releases(&call->user_mutex)
 {
 	struct sock *sk = &rx->sk;
-	enum rxrpc_call_state state;
 	long timeo;
 	bool more = msg->msg_flags & MSG_MORE;
 	int ret, copied = 0;
 
-	if (test_bit(RXRPC_CALL_TX_NO_MORE, &call->flags)) {
-		trace_rxrpc_abort(call->debug_id, rxrpc_sendmsg_late_send,
-				  call->cid, call->call_id, call->rx_consumed,
-				  0, -EPROTO);
-		ret = -EPROTO;
-		goto out_unlock;
-	}
-
 	timeo = sock_sndtimeo(sk, msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
 
 	ret = rxrpc_wait_to_be_connected(call, &timeo);
@@ -355,21 +346,31 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
 reload:
 	ret = -EPIPE;
 	if (sk->sk_shutdown & SEND_SHUTDOWN)
-		goto maybe_error;
-	state = rxrpc_call_state(call);
-	ret = -ESHUTDOWN;
-	if (state >= RXRPC_CALL_COMPLETE)
-		goto maybe_error;
-	ret = -EPROTO;
-	if (state != RXRPC_CALL_CLIENT_PRE_SEND &&
-	    state != RXRPC_CALL_CLIENT_SEND_REQUEST &&
-	    state != RXRPC_CALL_SERVER_ACK_REQUEST &&
-	    state != RXRPC_CALL_SERVER_SEND_REPLY) {
-		/* Request phase complete for this client call */
+		goto out_unlock;
+
+	switch (rxrpc_call_state(call)) {
+	case RXRPC_CALL_CLIENT_PRE_SEND:
+	case RXRPC_CALL_CLIENT_SEND_REQUEST:
+	case RXRPC_CALL_SERVER_ACK_REQUEST:
+	case RXRPC_CALL_SERVER_SEND_REPLY:
+		break;
+	case RXRPC_CALL_COMPLETE:
+		ret = -ESHUTDOWN;
+		goto out_unlock;
+	default:
+		ret = -EPROTO;
 		trace_rxrpc_abort(call->debug_id, rxrpc_sendmsg_late_send,
 				  call->cid, call->call_id, call->rx_consumed,
 				  0, -EPROTO);
-		goto maybe_error;
+		goto out_unlock;
+	}
+
+	if (unlikely(test_bit(RXRPC_CALL_TX_NO_MORE, &call->flags))) {
+		trace_rxrpc_abort(call->debug_id, rxrpc_sendmsg_late_send,
+				  call->cid, call->call_id, call->rx_consumed,
+				  0, -EPROTO);
+		ret = -EPROTO;
+		goto out_unlock;
 	}
 
 	ret = -EMSGSIZE;
@@ -435,8 +436,9 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
 
 		/* check for the far side aborting the call or a network error
 		 * occurring */
+		ret = -ESHUTDOWN;
 		if (rxrpc_call_is_complete(call))
-			goto call_terminated;
+			goto out_unlock;
 
 		/* add the packet to the send queue if it's now full */
 		if (!txb->space ||
@@ -449,31 +451,71 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
 				goto out_unlock;
 			rxrpc_queue_packet(rx, call, txb, notify_end_tx);
 			call->tx_pending = NULL;
+
+			/* At this point, if that was the last packet, it may
+			 * have been transmitted and the reply (client call) or
+			 * final ACK (service call) may have been received,
+			 * completing the call.
+			 */
 		}
 	} while (len > 0 && msg_data_left(msg) > 0);
 
-success:
+	/* Don't check for call completeness here, but leave that to recvmsg or
+	 * a further call to sendmsg().
+	 */
 	ret = copied;
-	if (rxrpc_call_is_complete(call) &&
-	    call->error < 0)
-		ret = call->error;
 out_unlock:
 	mutex_unlock(&call->user_mutex);
+out:
+
+	/* The return value is a bit complicated as we want to avoid returning
+	 * an error if we have queued the final packet.  In descending order of
+	 * preference:
+	 *
+	 * (1) If the send side of the socket is shut down, -EPIPE.
+	 *
+	 * (2) If the call has terminated early, likely due to an external
+	 *     event such as being remotely aborted: -ESHUTDOWN.
+	 *
+	 * (3) If the call is in the wrong state to transmit: -EPROTO.
+	 *
+	 * (4) If another sendmsg() has already queued the last packet: -EPROTO.
+	 *
+	 * (5) If we queue the last packet: the amount copied (which may be
+	 *     zero).  recvmsg() should be used to collect the result.
+	 *
+	 * (6) If some data has been copied by this call: the amount copied
+	 *     (which will be greater than zero).
+	 *
+	 * (7) Any other error.
+	 *
+	 * For (1)-(4), there's no point in continuing with the sendmsg().  The
+	 * app should abort the call (just in case the error came from
+	 * somewhere else) and then use recvmsg() to collect the final result
+	 * of the call.
+	 */
 	_leave(" = %d", ret);
 	return ret;
 
-call_terminated:
-	ret = call->error;
-	goto out_unlock;
-
 maybe_error:
-	if (copied)
-		goto success;
+	if (copied) {
+		if (test_bit(RXRPC_CALL_TX_NO_MORE, &call->flags)) {
+			/* If we've get here, we must have slept waiting for space and .
+			 */
+			ret = copied;
+			goto out_unlock;
+		}
+		if (rxrpc_call_is_complete(call)) {
+			ret = -ESHUTDOWN;
+			goto out_unlock;
+		}
+		ret = copied;
+	}
 	goto out_unlock;
 
 efault:
 	ret = -EFAULT;
-	goto out_unlock;
+	goto maybe_error;
 
 wait_for_space:
 	ret = -EAGAIN;
@@ -496,7 +538,9 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
 	goto reload;
 out_nolock:
 	_leave(" = %d [intr]", ret);
-	return copied ?: ret;
+	if (copied)
+		ret = copied;
+	goto out;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -818,8 +862,6 @@ int rxrpc_kernel_send_data(struct socket *sock, struct rxrpc_call *call,
 
 		ret = rxrpc_send_data(rxrpc_sk(sock->sk), call, msg,
 				      msg_data_left(msg), notify_end_tx);
-		if (ret == -ESHUTDOWN)
-			ret = call->error;
 		if (ret < 0)
 			break;
 		if (msg_data_left(msg) == 0) {


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-23 13:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-23 13:36 [PATCH net v11 00/17] rxrpc: Miscellaneous fixes David Howells
2026-09-23 13:36 ` [PATCH net v11 01/17] rxrpc: Revert "rxrpc: rxperf: Fix missing decoding of terminal magic cookie" David Howells
2026-09-23 13:36 ` [PATCH net v11 02/17] rxrpc: Fix rxperf test rxgk key kvno to be 0 David Howells
2026-09-23 13:36 ` [PATCH net v11 03/17] rxrpc: Fix update of call->tx_pending without holding lock David Howells
2026-09-23 13:36 ` [PATCH net v11 04/17] rxrpc: Fix lack of short-send handling in rxrpc_kernel_send_data() David Howells
2026-09-23 13:36 ` [PATCH net v11 05/17] afs: Fix afs to abort the rxrpc call on send error David Howells
2026-09-23 13:36 ` [PATCH net v11 06/17] rxrpc: Fix aborting in rxperf test server David Howells
2026-09-23 13:36 ` [PATCH net v11 07/17] rxrpc: Fix sendmsg length David Howells
2026-09-23 13:36 ` David Howells [this message]
2026-09-23 13:36 ` [PATCH net v11 09/17] rxrpc: Fix packet encryption error handling David Howells
2026-09-23 13:36 ` [PATCH net v11 10/17] rxrpc: Fix return in rxrpc_recvmsg_data() for service calls David Howells
2026-09-23 13:36 ` [PATCH net v11 11/17] rxrpc: Fix double IRQ enablement David Howells
2026-09-23 13:36 ` [PATCH net v11 12/17] rxrpc: Fix generation of notifications after call completion David Howells
2026-09-23 13:37 ` [PATCH net v11 13/17] rxrpc: Fix RxGK key parser to check enctype is supported David Howells
2026-09-23 13:37 ` [PATCH net v11 14/17] afs: Fix creation of RxGK CM channel token to have right size David Howells
2026-09-23 13:37 ` [PATCH net v11 15/17] afs: Fix lack of setting call->server when doing FS.InlineBulkStatus David Howells
2026-09-23 13:37 ` [PATCH net v11 16/17] afs: Fix uncleared op->call pointer David Howells
2026-09-23 13:37 ` [PATCH net v11 17/17] rxrpc: fix use-after-free in rxrpc_poke_conn() David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260923133706.1496540-9-dhowells@redhat.com \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaltman@auristor.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®