From: Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com>
To: "Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
"Ridong Chen" <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
"Guopeng Zhang" <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/3] cgroup/cpuset: fix exclusive CPU conflict checks for local and remote partitions
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 04:27:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260924042729.1908863-1-benquike@gmail.com> (raw)
This series fixes three exclusive CPU validation gaps across local and
remote partitions in kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c and adds corresponding
regression tests to tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh:
1. Patch 1/3 ("cgroup/cpuset: return PERR_NOCPUS in
remote_partition_enable() on subpartitions_cpus conflict"):
Restores the subpartitions_cpus conflict error check in
remote_partition_enable() (returning PERR_NOCPUS to match
remote_cpus_update()) so a remote partition cannot be enabled
underneath an ancestor local partition via a non-partition
intermediate cgroup.
2. Patch 2/3 ("cgroup/cpuset: prevent activating local partition over
remote one"):
Checks trialcs->exclusive_cpus against subpartitions_cpus in
validate_partition() when !is_partition_valid(cs) so an initially
invalid top-level partition cannot later transition to a valid local
partition over an active remote partition via cpuset.cpus /
cpuset.cpus.exclusive updates.
3. Patch 3/3 ("cgroup/cpuset: check sibling effective_xcpus in
cpus_excl_conflict()"):
Falls back to sibling->effective_xcpus in cpus_excl_conflict() when
sibling->exclusive_cpus is empty so a sibling cgroup cannot claim
cpuset.cpus.exclusive over a valid local partition's implicit
exclusive CPUs.
Changes in v4:
- Send as a standalone series with a cover letter (0/3) instead of
replying in-thread to the previous version, as requested by Ridong
Chen and Waiman Long.
- Restore the exact v2 diff and commit description for patch 1/3
(which was accidentally corrupted when splitting v2 into 3 patches in
v3), fixing git apply against mainline.
- Make the test_cpuset_prs.sh test case in patch 2/3 independent of the
system CPU count (using X2-3 / CX2-3:P2 / P1:CX1-3 instead of
CX0-7:P1), as pointed out by Waiman Long.
Changes in v3:
- Split patch 2/2 from v2 into patch 2/3 (validate_partition(),
Fixes: 6da580ec656a) and patch 3/3 (cpus_excl_conflict(),
Fixes: 2a3602030d80), as pointed out by Guopeng Zhang.
- Add Assisted-by: LLM tag.
Changes in v2:
- Split the remote_partition_enable() fix into patch 1/2 and return
PERR_NOCPUS instead of PERR_INVCPUS to match remote_cpus_update(), as
suggested by Guopeng Zhang.
- Add step-by-step reproducer and test_cpuset_prs.sh regression tests,
as requested by Ridong Chen.
Hui Peng (3):
cgroup/cpuset: return PERR_NOCPUS in remote_partition_enable() on subpartitions_cpus conflict
cgroup/cpuset: prevent activating local partition over remote one
cgroup/cpuset: check sibling effective_xcpus in cpus_excl_conflict()
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 12 ++++++++++--
tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
2.49.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-24 4:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 4:27 Hui Peng [this message]
2026-09-24 4:27 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] cgroup/cpuset: return PERR_NOCPUS in remote_partition_enable() on subpartitions_cpus conflict Hui Peng
2026-09-24 4:27 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] cgroup/cpuset: prevent activating local partition over remote one Hui Peng
2026-09-24 4:27 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] cgroup/cpuset: check sibling effective_xcpus in cpus_excl_conflict() Hui Peng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260924042729.1908863-1-benquike@gmail.com \
--to=benquike@gmail.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@huawei.com \
--cc=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®