From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0b-0031df01.pphosted.com (mx0b-0031df01.pphosted.com [205.220.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4817A3B19AA for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 22:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=205.220.180.131 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790288444; cv=none; b=aGeSIQ1vXPVIvEz5bWhm2i+ahtRGXuk4kMlcYvywHkOYvwhSm6oXh7ifXqv8vyrzV5/QPvEsCffVYpqizmd8+QjEetmThNIHcrRI/7MoDD6PBO3jikzFoeimXnhbTyp3tONdU8/FrCsStl5lP3pQDcWOvd9m5cSb/zQ7mxECg8E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790288444; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yPDFtSzOArCINVVZkEx+dztNh/aGMUPCr8wwfmMt9Dw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nsVyeS2O3+JmW8ofneNsp1F2kGtwf2PRKbXchlqHC49zE0tM0qSbkQHBry9KViTeaPaA5Plg8ZAu6zn3AkMX5+bGoM/wazz4MVSB53eQTF3tXbgiCAVrndw9fKm+xFaO1q+b03o2vFBTnpB5/ve0+hFyMcwkWhj3zg9ns8+hAmE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=oss.qualcomm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=oss.qualcomm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=qualcomm.com header.i=@qualcomm.com header.b=HrdbwMeI; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oss.qualcomm.com header.i=@oss.qualcomm.com header.b=FnbRnz1z; arc=none smtp.client-ip=205.220.180.131 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=oss.qualcomm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=oss.qualcomm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=qualcomm.com header.i=@qualcomm.com header.b="HrdbwMeI"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oss.qualcomm.com header.i=@oss.qualcomm.com header.b="FnbRnz1z" Received: from pps.filterd (m0279868.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.11/8.18.1.11) with ESMTP id 68OIe39G2866857 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 22:20:42 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qualcomm.com; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to; s=qcppdkim1; bh= 4zZceZgWFQ3ZLDRQVIpqHYrcnvzmelr0JdvwQT4DK6A=; b=HrdbwMeIqm0nSjmN zCT4rY+9fjyOwZnb86hfmPeEx0yFmklUtVf2lzQL3djhfocyVLQPPLI4CTBUDgdv A+VIqqMUH5lo5eRQhxff+UQFhsGBr8lWbb3+8x+JRR++mjoBxqBZMyBeimadoZ+1 9omb1qw4EQGcMJeHkkaO/jfpEHS5LPuw2yEw9TEPzsXbEvmjFf0tCHrTHXxJK09s EooV/JiZdiyFnqdFfbQLyTwyJw+RWyzmgHrG7IpO/MWKN07vrUGdxSUPwKrZVq8d tbbsm+RlLcKJf7XVMApEI+82DzfaCCejMFFBCBQ4xmvI9QGWQr3BFno4sqODbhPk URo0hA== Received: from mail-dy1-f200.google.com (mail-dy1-f200.google.com [74.125.82.200]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4gw5q8sve4-1 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 22:20:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: by mail-dy1-f200.google.com with SMTP id 5a478bee46e88-3284bbaa89dso932847eec.0 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 15:20:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oss.qualcomm.com; s=google; t=1790288425; x=1790893225; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:mime-version:organization :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=4zZceZgWFQ3ZLDRQVIpqHYrcnvzmelr0JdvwQT4DK6A=; b=FnbRnz1zJJqx/LNEGaPno3JPrzK8JNpzLR8DVkRg9m9FShV9bfm86oUSQWysA5JyTS JQaPvF0zn4OWBjwC3+Il0JoQN95IMNcvzyw2F1qTYIfqJNRD702JuE1ymS12QmSZiYCr yhNbQTtAPZtZZ4KhuPWmpDsV6Qz4PwwUGH2zIuEkOCDFTHNpmdgb0oAx9J0mj5uK1S4a glKZD0JzrrTCNeqTWS9WUV1bx6quJj1HwDlpsxmYCjSD/yeHqeguy7BS/uyMM6nJA2BZ iIhOOzHmqtICXt05anhb9BzKVOjlcAlgbiHG0ecXhD7S+lNNlcdabvRfobLNUjzKnXJO 9DCg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20260707; t=1790288425; x=1790893225; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:mime-version:organization :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=4zZceZgWFQ3ZLDRQVIpqHYrcnvzmelr0JdvwQT4DK6A=; b=VyIalD7yjTvHf/irFDVO3DCUlskxnj2N1zYgZKLExJFfxwMs+3K1yTgVzo9CTVpDI/ M3+f0/5oY9VPqM7wFgCt2WBhDnkiA3V/Ya8tkKRzllcVXqerA+kYnwYQwQBEGBGyfR53 ZfTGKNvAzbNYroxlrTCgaLZAWCSuq46n8G73HPURTq4PGEVzTbUcoRWJL8dpXYCospZK Joh3dh+7q4V87zEIAZN+v+SwsEX66sbmi1Lgl/sMi+AaZFNrbgGz0PIF3+cda5lGs3Qx yDo5UHWNntZ8Ekp8lKGaaE3c8aw3kbslaanKJDZbx9csoudhDkLM9LYBHAnTf5q5sT/3 esZw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AKwUvBzemRDtUV9jbHYpALWZsZpO1YOY7kBCEwdnY7MCMtdWM4lTeXfjcPuyM2IC5zTz1whWBM58N+zdXcVmR9g=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AFuF++m/ScmoPX0t9AW5rf7StYviJXvMrMWStkKfxvqOp0P2nauzRM4E 59V22eiXG+05hz4P0lmL5xm7it5YciAAO0Bgw+8h3ZLc1co90UdM1Klx8uvri1agleDnFyX+AxN SLtK6ZsZHkZTh+73AMdWjXzeDFsmgOyWROvG4yX0Dd2OGrqMmrEoAm9e/m0z9PMrf9zI= X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou3M7LUsafJAWAN33uG+qejgA09KMunhpYJjTW7TOn5ldPC5pxvYpYhexdnT6tC TjL6y1aQrY5ZO+DdhfcmlrQ4Di35/5Eowo+TzviDVRfo/wV7OLgG8GgQ0I4IJHhg0GAtXDwf9Nq cJoGw6jgaOMAlbz4lDoIgnuLnPbvG5gZU0vlVqgymg+RvEJ3UUZNIzVvgChQErm9HEnwPTLCpto KX86DwA3MupsAsiklume0+sdVmwX1ynJD8ZEoJbh9Fvsw3v0JEBAuuZcqvibQRYQ4MIzQ3zMwzt cXDTj/CD6phrZssFsGPE7cfZuif8LCl0h0J4sGa1gfpRt8T+loFczToGzvjYfIg47UUTqUAAifL bbaSu3WonWNRaK1zWY5NZXe/fmJ9d4ZBQNHG8fXj+GurM11jFlFuHmg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:7300:cf90:b0:339:7b3b:236d with SMTP id 5a478bee46e88-34001f081bcmr3059389eec.15.1790288425257; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 15:20:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:7300:cf90:b0:339:7b3b:236d with SMTP id 5a478bee46e88-34001f081bcmr3059364eec.15.1790288424751; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 15:20:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (i-global254.qualcomm.com. [199.106.103.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5a478bee46e88-34145c166cfsm1343887eec.28.2026.09.24.15.20.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 24 Sep 2026 15:20:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 15:20:17 -0700 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Andre Przywara Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Hanjun Guo , Sudeep Holla , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Len Brown , James Morse , Ben Horgan , Reinette Chatre , Fenghua Yu , Jonathan Cameron , Srivathsa L Rao , Ganapatrao Kulkarni , Trilok Soni , Srinivas Ramana , Niyas Sait , Lee Trager , Ritwick Sharma , Gavin Shan , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 08/13] arm_mpam: propagate MSC access errors for interrupt control Message-ID: <20260924152017.00004ec8@oss.qualcomm.com> In-Reply-To: <20260924152739.2865510-9-andre.przywara@arm.com> References: <20260924152739.2865510-1-andre.przywara@arm.com> <20260924152739.2865510-9-andre.przywara@arm.com> Organization: Qualcomm X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.4.0 (GTK 3.24.51; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Proofpoint-Spam-Info: AW1haW4tMjYwOTI0MDA5MSBTYWx0ZWRfXyhVDuN5fNtIQ gC6SfmG8yFRMHexxF31iZgq4OK0yETF6KF7SLmKMmY/Vu0fCznk0O0H8FXlSK28I4QLbZatp1Hu 0u9stYRpR0RinoRrFukNT3OUNV+UwMI= X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details-Enc: AW1haW4tMjYwOTI0MDA5MSBTYWx0ZWRfX8DNN7YFRtFxd VClV1/ZJ32v1j38i8SC2WVKOW5CZxz9pg1TpBExY+S+RvtBceotxylMvLamh/qGepvx+boQxwmv JruJoOj5vd6thw/TJ5gjbWlziErkizG/4XlH5XHpbHMXsU88+zWuA9EuDnyXmtNMcDclMCMx9zH 1S5z+xmpDpzAZjZJcJigByn2zrjBm2JFgqBCxkqakMrrHChAuQjj+Iph+DMGpNftsRUJD6i+93/ 95O6j8m2pwxI3UapOCGiiFUdyGOlPd252wxHC+vWPa/6WJRlorNmhBpFAeUCcp3ED82R6lWUcKc pS+4QosUkmbMUGtLrzXlCnIlouE9wRgBzVD5pYXIITfTCctKK1rjfaYCHDVodeHeugJIQNF9lbr JLlxjdjbt/yuQQeSDNKDE1e/cI/yd1Udz3ReuqOkpPytiJnRjdlwP2+MuwOOzix9J896lAEVQ7t Fl8pASKVl4GgJjHudOg== X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=SYRi5fRu c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=6ab5a22a cx=c_pps a=PfFC4Oe2JQzmKTvty2cRDw==:117 a=JYp8KDb2vCoCEuGobkYCKw==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=VdqzKS8jKosA:10 a=s4-Qcg_JpJYA:10 a=VkNPw1HP01LnGYTKEx00:22 a=u7WPNUs3qKkmUXheDGA7:22 a=ZpdpYltYx_vBUK5n70dp:22 a=7CQSdrXTAAAA:8 a=EUspDBNiAAAA:8 a=BicPeEsDMmYJQF04euIA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=6Ab_bkdmUrQuMsNx7PHu:22 a=a-qgeE7W1pNrGK8U0ZQC:22 X-Proofpoint-GUID: Ad5IShY3PIrhqCkedzlc0aPp4rovX3sl X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: Ad5IShY3PIrhqCkedzlc0aPp4rovX3sl X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1176,Hydra:6.1.134,FMLib:17.12.100.49 definitions=2026-09-24_05,2026-09-21_02,2025-10-01_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=typeunknown authscore=0 authtc= authcc= route=outbound adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.22.0-2609040000 definitions=main-2609240091 On Thu, 24 Sep 2026 17:27:34 +0200 Andre Przywara wrote: > Allow the functions dealing with interrupt registration and enablement > to check for and return errors, and propagate MSC read and write errors > from the lower level up. > This does not cover the IRQ handler yet, as this needs some more > attention. > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara > Reviewed-by: Srivathsa L Rao A few trivial things below. Anyhow, I don't really care about them so Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron > --- > drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c | 31 +++++++++++++++---------------- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c > index 558efab75f911..eb26c25b9f970 100644 > --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c > +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c > @@ -1105,7 +1105,9 @@ static int mpam_msc_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc *msc) > } > > /* Clear any stale errors */ > - mpam_msc_clear_esr(msc); > + ret = mpam_msc_clear_esr(msc); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > > spin_lock(&partid_max_lock); > mpam_partid_max = min(mpam_partid_max, msc->partid_max); > @@ -2668,9 +2670,7 @@ static int mpam_enable_msc_ecr(void *_msc) > { > struct mpam_msc *msc = _msc; > > - __mpam_write_reg(msc, MPAMF_ECR, MPAMF_ECR_INTEN); > - > - return 0; > + return __mpam_write_reg(msc, MPAMF_ECR, MPAMF_ECR_INTEN); > } > > /* This can run in mpam_disable(), and the interrupt handler on the same CPU */ > @@ -2678,9 +2678,7 @@ static int mpam_disable_msc_ecr(void *_msc) > { > struct mpam_msc *msc = _msc; > > - __mpam_write_reg(msc, MPAMF_ECR, 0); > - > - return 0; > + return __mpam_write_reg(msc, MPAMF_ECR, 0); > } > > static irqreturn_t __mpam_irq_handler(int irq, struct mpam_msc *msc) > @@ -2777,11 +2775,13 @@ static int mpam_register_irqs(void) > return err; > } > > - mutex_lock(&msc->error_irq_lock); > - msc->error_irq_req = true; > - mpam_touch_msc(msc, mpam_enable_msc_ecr, msc); > - msc->error_irq_hw_enabled = true; > - mutex_unlock(&msc->error_irq_lock); > + scoped_guard(mutex, &msc->error_irq_lock) { > + msc->error_irq_req = true; > + err = mpam_touch_msc(msc, mpam_enable_msc_ecr, msc); > + if (err) > + return err; > + msc->error_irq_hw_enabled = true; > + } Scope ends here so unless something else gets added in later patches, you could just use a guard() and reduce the noise. > } > > return 0; > @@ -2800,10 +2800,10 @@ static void mpam_unregister_irqs(void) > if (irq <= 0) > continue; > > - mutex_lock(&msc->error_irq_lock); Given you don't return early as a result this is an unrelated change. I don't really mind but in ideal world would be a separate patch. > + guard(mutex)(&msc->error_irq_lock); > if (msc->error_irq_hw_enabled) { > - mpam_touch_msc(msc, mpam_disable_msc_ecr, msc); > - msc->error_irq_hw_enabled = false; > + if (!mpam_touch_msc(msc, mpam_disable_msc_ecr, msc)) > + msc->error_irq_hw_enabled = false; > } > > if (msc->error_irq_req) { > @@ -2815,7 +2815,6 @@ static void mpam_unregister_irqs(void) > } > msc->error_irq_req = false; > } > - mutex_unlock(&msc->error_irq_lock); > } > } >