From: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
To: arighi@nvidia.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, bsegall@google.com,
changwoo@igalia.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, etsal@meta.com,
juri.lelli@redhat.com, kprateek.nayak@amd.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mgorman@suse.de, mingo@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, tj@kernel.org,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, void@manifault.com,
vschneid@redhat.com, yphbchou0911@gmail.com
Cc: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH] sched_ext: Place dsq_vtime next to dsq_priq
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 09:14:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260924161446.3039726-1-usama.arif@linux.dev> (raw)
scx_dispatch_enqueue() calls rb_add() for a vtime-ordered DSQ while
holding dsq->lock. At each level of the descent, scx_dsq_priq_less()
loads the visited task's dsq_vtime, and that comparison selects rb_left
or rb_right from the same task's dsq_priq. In the x86-64 benchmark
configuration, these accesses fell on different 64-byte cache lines
before this change, so a cold visited task could require a second cache
line fill on the dependent descent path.
Move dsq_vtime immediately before dsq_priq, keeping dsq_seq and
dsq_flags next to dsq_list. In the two x86-64 layouts inspected, where
scx starts at offsets 776 and 840 in task_struct, the fields from
dsq_list through dsq_priq occupy one cache line. The exact cache line
placement depends on the containing task_struct layout and is not
guaranteed for every configuration or architecture. Where they share a
line, avoiding the dependent cache line fill helps reduce dsq->lock hold
time during vtime insertion and therefore contention on the lock.
In a 16-vCPU KVM guest, the instrumented enqueue interval was 4-6%
shorter with scx_lavd and scx_layered. scx_mitosis and end-to-end
workload time showed no consistent change.
This only reorders fields; no scheduling behavior change is intended.
Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
---
include/linux/sched/ext.h | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/ext.h b/include/linux/sched/ext.h
index 1e1fc3312bc40..b856768716249 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/ext.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/ext.h
@@ -197,9 +197,19 @@ struct sched_ext_entity {
u64 ddsp_slice;
u64 ddsp_vtime;
struct scx_dsq_list_node dsq_list; /* dispatch order */
- struct rb_node dsq_priq; /* p->scx.dsq_vtime order */
u32 dsq_seq;
u32 dsq_flags; /* protected by DSQ lock */
+
+ /*
+ * Used to order tasks when dispatching to the vtime-ordered priority
+ * queue of a dsq. This is usually set through
+ * scx_bpf_dsq_insert_vtime() but can also be modified directly by the
+ * BPF scheduler. Modifying it while a task is queued on a dsq may
+ * mangle the ordering and is not recommended. Kept next to @dsq_priq
+ * as rbtree insertion reads both on every visited node.
+ */
+ u64 dsq_vtime;
+ struct rb_node dsq_priq; /* p->scx.dsq_vtime order */
u32 flags; /* protected by rq lock */
u32 weight;
u32 reenq_cnt; /* reenqueues since last run */
@@ -225,7 +235,7 @@ struct sched_ext_entity {
u64 tid;
struct rhash_head tid_hash_node; /* see SCX_OPS_TID_TO_TASK */
- /* BPF scheduler modifiable fields */
+ /* BPF scheduler modifiable fields, along with @dsq_vtime above */
/*
* Runtime budget in nsecs - how long the task may hold its cpu. Owned
@@ -240,15 +250,6 @@ struct sched_ext_entity {
*/
u64 slice;
- /*
- * Used to order tasks when dispatching to the vtime-ordered priority
- * queue of a dsq. This is usually set through
- * scx_bpf_dsq_insert_vtime() but can also be modified directly by the
- * BPF scheduler. Modifying it while a task is queued on a dsq may
- * mangle the ordering and is not recommended.
- */
- u64 dsq_vtime;
-
/*
* Out-of-band slice request from scx_bpf_task_set_slice() when the
* caller does not hold the rq lock, applied under the rq lock at the
--
2.53.0-Meta
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-24 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 16:14 Usama Arif [this message]
2026-09-24 16:57 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260924161446.3039726-1-usama.arif@linux.dev \
--to=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=etsal@meta.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yphbchou0911@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®