From: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v9 22/22] KVM: arm64: selftests: Add test case for Partitioned PMU
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 17:29:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260924172928.2110956-23-coltonlewis@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924172928.2110956-1-coltonlewis@google.com>
Extend arm64/vpmu_counter_access to run all PMU counter access,
PMCR.N validation, and overflow interrupt tests against both the
emulated vPMU and the Partitioned PMU.
Introduce enum vpmu_impl (EMULATED_VPMU vs. PARTITIONED_VPMU) and thread
it through the test setup helpers to configure
KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_ENABLE_PARTITION and
KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_SET_NR_COUNTERS when testing the Partitioned PMU.
Skip out-of-bounds counter access exception tests when the PMU is
partitioned, as hardware does not guarantee an UNDEFINED exception on
accesses to unimplemented counters.
Signed-off-by: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>
---
.../selftests/kvm/arm64/vpmu_counter_access.c | 129 ++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 99 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/vpmu_counter_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/vpmu_counter_access.c
index 22223395969e0..811f8156cea3c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/vpmu_counter_access.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/vpmu_counter_access.c
@@ -25,12 +25,27 @@
/* The cycle counter bit position that's common among the PMU registers */
#define ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX 31
+enum pmu_impl {
+ EMULATED,
+ PARTITIONED
+};
+
+const char *pmu_impl_str[] = {
+ "Emulated",
+ "Partitioned"
+};
+
struct vpmu_vm {
struct kvm_vm *vm;
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
};
+struct guest_context {
+ bool pmu_partitioned;
+};
+
static struct vpmu_vm vpmu_vm;
+static struct guest_context guest_context;
struct pmreg_sets {
u64 set_reg_id;
@@ -331,11 +346,16 @@ static void test_access_invalid_pmc_regs(struct pmc_accessor *acc, int pmc_idx)
/*
* Reading/writing the event count/type registers should cause
* an UNDEFINED exception.
+ *
+ * If the pmu is partitioned, we can't guarantee it because
+ * hardware doesn't.
*/
- TEST_EXCEPTION(ESR_ELx_EC_UNKNOWN, acc->read_cntr(pmc_idx));
- TEST_EXCEPTION(ESR_ELx_EC_UNKNOWN, acc->write_cntr(pmc_idx, 0));
- TEST_EXCEPTION(ESR_ELx_EC_UNKNOWN, acc->read_typer(pmc_idx));
- TEST_EXCEPTION(ESR_ELx_EC_UNKNOWN, acc->write_typer(pmc_idx, 0));
+ if (!guest_context.pmu_partitioned) {
+ TEST_EXCEPTION(ESR_ELx_EC_UNKNOWN, acc->read_cntr(pmc_idx));
+ TEST_EXCEPTION(ESR_ELx_EC_UNKNOWN, acc->write_cntr(pmc_idx, 0));
+ TEST_EXCEPTION(ESR_ELx_EC_UNKNOWN, acc->read_typer(pmc_idx));
+ TEST_EXCEPTION(ESR_ELx_EC_UNKNOWN, acc->write_typer(pmc_idx, 0));
+ }
/*
* The bit corresponding to the (unimplemented) counter in
* {PMCNTEN,PMINTEN,PMOVS}{SET,CLR} registers should be RAZ.
@@ -399,7 +419,7 @@ static void guest_code(u64 expected_pmcr_n)
}
/* Create a VM that has one vCPU with PMUv3 configured. */
-static void create_vpmu_vm(void *guest_code)
+static void create_vpmu_vm(void *guest_code, enum pmu_impl impl)
{
struct kvm_vcpu_init init;
u8 pmuver, ec;
@@ -409,6 +429,13 @@ static void create_vpmu_vm(void *guest_code)
.attr = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ,
.addr = (u64)&irq,
};
+ u32 partition = (impl == PARTITIONED);
+ struct kvm_device_attr part_attr = {
+ .group = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
+ .attr = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_ENABLE_PARTITION,
+ .addr = (uint64_t)&partition
+ };
+ int ret;
/* The test creates the vpmu_vm multiple times. Ensure a clean state */
memset(&vpmu_vm, 0, sizeof(vpmu_vm));
@@ -436,6 +463,15 @@ static void create_vpmu_vm(void *guest_code)
"Unexpected PMUVER (0x%x) on the vCPU with PMUv3", pmuver);
vcpu_ioctl(vpmu_vm.vcpu, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &irq_attr);
+
+ ret = __vcpu_has_device_attr(
+ vpmu_vm.vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_ENABLE_PARTITION);
+ if (!ret) {
+ vcpu_ioctl(vpmu_vm.vcpu, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &part_attr);
+ guest_context.pmu_partitioned = partition;
+ pr_debug("Set PMU partitioning: %d\n", partition);
+ }
+
}
static void destroy_vpmu_vm(void)
@@ -461,13 +497,14 @@ static void run_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 pmcr_n)
}
}
-static void test_create_vpmu_vm_with_nr_counters(unsigned int nr_counters, bool expect_fail)
+static void test_create_vpmu_vm_with_nr_counters(
+ unsigned int nr_counters, enum pmu_impl impl, bool expect_fail)
{
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
unsigned int prev;
int ret;
- create_vpmu_vm(guest_code);
+ create_vpmu_vm(guest_code, impl);
vcpu = vpmu_vm.vcpu;
prev = get_pmcr_n(vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0)));
@@ -475,21 +512,24 @@ static void test_create_vpmu_vm_with_nr_counters(unsigned int nr_counters, bool
ret = __vcpu_device_attr_set(vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_SET_NR_COUNTERS, &nr_counters);
- if (expect_fail)
+ if (expect_fail) {
TEST_ASSERT(ret && errno == EINVAL,
"Setting more PMU counters (%u) than available (%u) unexpectedly succeeded",
nr_counters, prev);
- else
- TEST_ASSERT(!ret, KVM_IOCTL_ERROR(KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, ret));
+ return;
+ }
+
+ TEST_ASSERT(!ret, KVM_IOCTL_ERROR(KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, ret));
vcpu_device_attr_set(vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT, NULL);
+ sync_global_to_guest(vpmu_vm.vm, guest_context);
}
/*
* Create a guest with one vCPU, set the PMCR_EL0.N for the vCPU to @pmcr_n,
* and run the test.
*/
-static void run_access_test(u64 pmcr_n)
+static void run_access_test(u64 pmcr_n, enum pmu_impl impl)
{
u64 sp;
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
@@ -497,7 +537,7 @@ static void run_access_test(u64 pmcr_n)
pr_debug("Test with pmcr_n %lu\n", pmcr_n);
- test_create_vpmu_vm_with_nr_counters(pmcr_n, false);
+ test_create_vpmu_vm_with_nr_counters(pmcr_n, impl, false);
vcpu = vpmu_vm.vcpu;
/* Save the initial sp to restore them later to run the guest again */
@@ -531,14 +571,14 @@ static struct pmreg_sets validity_check_reg_sets[] = {
* Create a VM, and check if KVM handles the userspace accesses of
* the PMU register sets in @validity_check_reg_sets[] correctly.
*/
-static void run_pmregs_validity_test(u64 pmcr_n)
+static void run_pmregs_validity_test(u64 pmcr_n, enum pmu_impl impl)
{
int i;
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
u64 set_reg_id, clr_reg_id, reg_val;
u64 valid_counters_mask, max_counters_mask;
- test_create_vpmu_vm_with_nr_counters(pmcr_n, false);
+ test_create_vpmu_vm_with_nr_counters(pmcr_n, impl, false);
vcpu = vpmu_vm.vcpu;
valid_counters_mask = get_counters_mask(pmcr_n);
@@ -588,11 +628,11 @@ static void run_pmregs_validity_test(u64 pmcr_n)
* the vCPU to @pmcr_n, which is larger than the host value.
* The attempt should fail as @pmcr_n is too big to set for the vCPU.
*/
-static void run_error_test(u64 pmcr_n)
+static void run_error_test(u64 pmcr_n, enum pmu_impl impl)
{
- pr_debug("Error test with pmcr_n %lu (larger than the host)\n", pmcr_n);
+ pr_debug("Error test with pmcr_n %lu (larger than the host allows)\n", pmcr_n);
- test_create_vpmu_vm_with_nr_counters(pmcr_n, true);
+ test_create_vpmu_vm_with_nr_counters(pmcr_n, impl, true);
destroy_vpmu_vm();
}
@@ -600,21 +640,26 @@ static void run_error_test(u64 pmcr_n)
* Return the default number of implemented PMU event counters excluding
* the cycle counter (i.e. PMCR_EL0.N value) for the guest.
*/
-static u64 get_pmcr_n_limit(void)
+static u64 get_pmcr_n_limit(enum pmu_impl impl)
{
- u64 pmcr;
+ u64 pmcr, n;
- create_vpmu_vm(guest_code);
+ create_vpmu_vm(guest_code, impl);
pmcr = vcpu_get_reg(vpmu_vm.vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0));
destroy_vpmu_vm();
- return get_pmcr_n(pmcr);
+
+ n = get_pmcr_n(pmcr);
+ if (impl == PARTITIONED && n > 0)
+ return n - 1;
+
+ return n;
}
static bool kvm_supports_nr_counters_attr(void)
{
bool supported;
- create_vpmu_vm(NULL);
+ create_vpmu_vm(NULL, EMULATED);
supported = !__vcpu_has_device_attr(vpmu_vm.vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_SET_NR_COUNTERS);
destroy_vpmu_vm();
@@ -622,22 +667,46 @@ static bool kvm_supports_nr_counters_attr(void)
return supported;
}
-int main(void)
+static bool kvm_supports_partition_attr(void)
+{
+ bool supported;
+
+ create_vpmu_vm(NULL, EMULATED);
+ supported = !__vcpu_has_device_attr(vpmu_vm.vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
+ KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_ENABLE_PARTITION);
+ destroy_vpmu_vm();
+
+ return supported;
+}
+
+void test_pmu(enum pmu_impl impl)
{
u64 i, pmcr_n;
- TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3));
- TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_supports_vgic_v3());
- TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_supports_nr_counters_attr());
+ pr_info("Testing PMU: Implementation = %s\n", pmu_impl_str[impl]);
+
+ pmcr_n = get_pmcr_n_limit(impl);
+ pr_debug("PMCR_EL0.N: Limit = %lu\n", pmcr_n);
- pmcr_n = get_pmcr_n_limit();
for (i = 0; i <= pmcr_n; i++) {
- run_access_test(i);
- run_pmregs_validity_test(i);
+ run_access_test(i, impl);
+ run_pmregs_validity_test(i, impl);
}
for (i = pmcr_n + 1; i < ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS; i++)
- run_error_test(i);
+ run_error_test(i, impl);
+}
+
+int main(void)
+{
+ TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3));
+ TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_supports_vgic_v3());
+ TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_supports_nr_counters_attr());
+
+ test_pmu(EMULATED);
+
+ if (kvm_supports_partition_attr() && get_pmcr_n_limit(EMULATED) > 0)
+ test_pmu(PARTITIONED);
return 0;
}
--
2.56.0.rc1.310.g51773c2048-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-24 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 17:29 [PATCH v9 00/22] ARM64 PMU Partitioning Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 01/22] arm64: cpufeature: Add cpucap for HPMN0 Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 02/22] KVM: arm64: Reorganize PMU includes Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 03/22] KVM: arm64: Reorganize PMU functions Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 04/22] perf: arm_pmuv3: Generalize counter bitmasks Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 05/22] perf: arm_pmuv3: Move counter allocation mask to per-CPU struct pmu_hw_events Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 06/22] perf: arm_pmuv3: Check cntr_mask before using pmccntr Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 07/22] perf: arm_pmuv3: Allocate counter indices from high to low Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 08/22] KVM: arm64: Add initial scaffolding for Partitioned PMU Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 09/22] KVM: arm64: Set up FGT " Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 10/22] KVM: arm64: Add Partitioned PMU register trap handlers Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 11/22] KVM: arm64: Set up MDCR_EL2 to handle a Partitioned PMU Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 12/22] KVM: arm64: Context swap Partitioned PMU guest registers Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 13/22] KVM: arm64: Enforce PMU event filter at vcpu_load() Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 14/22] perf: Add perf_pmu_resched_update() Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 15/22] KVM: arm64: Allow kvm_vcpu_pmu_resync_el0() to resync filters in process context Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 16/22] KVM: arm64: Apply dynamic guest counter reservations Colton Lewis
2026-09-30 15:28 ` James Clark
2026-10-01 21:33 ` Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 17/22] KVM: arm64: Implement lazy PMU context swaps Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 18/22] perf: arm_pmuv3: Handle IRQs for Partitioned PMU guest counters Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 19/22] KVM: arm64: Detect overflows for the Partitioned PMU Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 20/22] KVM: arm64: Add vCPU device attr to partition the PMU Colton Lewis
2026-09-30 15:27 ` James Clark
2026-10-01 21:21 ` Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v9 21/22] KVM: selftests: Add find_bit to KVM library Colton Lewis
2026-09-24 17:29 ` Colton Lewis [this message]
2026-09-30 15:25 ` [PATCH v9 00/22] ARM64 PMU Partitioning James Clark
2026-10-01 21:33 ` Colton Lewis
2026-09-30 15:26 ` James Clark
2026-10-01 21:33 ` Colton Lewis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260924172928.2110956-23-coltonlewis@google.com \
--to=coltonlewis@google.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
--cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mizhang@google.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®