From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 001914ADD92; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 18:24:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790274244; cv=none; b=majvqHkEi25reJcvj8iCXdGRdQBc20e2hkKwEiexxnOC1Z+N11BrIf1xTxU5qLTl4pNeLygSj5+SEGMLCoToA9ZG45z0C2wAmTGDqmfNeDXNIB5VaDokuRfuRwjhcoABwq6fYPtSIbyo8sdk9KsWgeUS0b10jnJumDX4n933PyE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790274244; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5+J9lJ3AvqQV2FjVBib/zG4wwMZuAyNQEHlOEjfss7c=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=lC1UD5ZUF60tz6aI6CD9GB6xc2tm2htLjVPGhgyLAS6uJNW4X5oe4Ki5XLAuDv1ySP6cgHqH9WVLUBlqemdty2jN0LK2jNNCpkbZjdtTT7PUAAzOFUXzRSZBzjRRwYoUkQfK1LUZd6s4s4wSVTXB0owgo+N9cIEyAG7Fp0BiCsw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=iulflwCP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="iulflwCP" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1790274242; x=1821810242; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5+J9lJ3AvqQV2FjVBib/zG4wwMZuAyNQEHlOEjfss7c=; b=iulflwCPZ7PtWJr4lHgXvLwLIYBO8x6hmB4uRGFX94RCVIcCYG8CPDXH kj04YDGtucdxwoyWOcEUuDpEFB5+N/VX6HUEiAkjdm7cgRfF+ZKG31X57 GPp16lcAWB3eeiXTxg1xH56ChGv+hwUdrAEkQrcfCMztvK9a7WBEhZ6CN 9PLu/M00DP32ir5HEByV+gFGvVHezYakJP8NNDiUP0M4ZBHRJpEuYkqAL ZKK6c0He8I3mlxFkmQVscLb1uSGqzMCdv1YokAAbpsAIoeOvecQsozj72 OCiRHu+KbsrLCAIO9LDPKHWAK20t9bSZsAvdnMX5l3ErWFp27iG5d3zdw Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: GrcIx9bxT0+AhLS2U93sLQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: V/h0IUd6S1G5CIqATjh55w== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11915"; a="91164264" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,121,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="91164264" Received: from orviesa010.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.150]) by fmvoesa109.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Sep 2026 11:23:45 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: WRFWyfTFTsq666XoDPunEg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: a6YzgEDfQxKGXVF2Rwf3gg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,121,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="272229922" Received: from skuppusw-desk2.jf.intel.com ([10.165.154.101]) by orviesa010-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Sep 2026 11:23:45 -0700 From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan To: Srinivas Pandruvada , Hans de Goede , =?UTF-8?q?Ilpo=20J=C3=A4rvinen?= , David E Box Cc: Andy Shevchenko , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 05/19] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Keep the feature resources in intel_tpmi_info Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 11:23:27 -0700 Message-ID: <20260924182342.212709-6-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20260924182342.212709-1-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> References: <20260924182342.212709-1-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The PFS walk and tpmi_create_devices() go back to the intel_vsec_device for the MMIO resource array and its count, although the count is already cached in intel_tpmi_info. Cache the resource array as well and use it everywhere. The array belongs to the enumerating device and outlives the TPMI instance, so holding a pointer to it is safe. Fewer places need an intel_vsec_device, which enumeration methods other than PCI VSEC do not have. No functional change. Co-developed-by: Srinivas Pandruvada Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/platform/x86/intel/vsec_tpmi.c | 12 +++++++----- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/vsec_tpmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/vsec_tpmi.c index d254dc6a4d0d..b462fd0319e5 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/vsec_tpmi.c +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/vsec_tpmi.c @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ struct intel_tpmi_pm_feature { * @plat_info: Stores platform info which can be used by the client drivers * @tpmi_control_mem: Memory mapped IO for getting control information * @dbgfs_dir: debugfs entry pointer + * @resource: Array of feature_count MMIO resources, one per PFS entry * * Stores the information for all TPMI devices enumerated from a single PCI device. */ @@ -121,6 +122,7 @@ struct intel_tpmi_info { struct oobmsm_plat_info plat_info; void __iomem *tpmi_control_mem; struct dentry *dbgfs_dir; + struct resource *resource; }; /** @@ -656,10 +658,9 @@ static int tpmi_create_device(struct intel_tpmi_info *tpmi_info, static int tpmi_create_devices(struct intel_tpmi_info *tpmi_info) { - struct intel_vsec_device *vsec_dev = tpmi_info->vsec_dev; int ret, i; - for (i = 0; i < vsec_dev->num_resources; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < tpmi_info->feature_count; i++) { ret = tpmi_create_device(tpmi_info, &tpmi_info->tpmi_features[i], tpmi_info->pfs_start); /* @@ -748,15 +749,16 @@ static int intel_vsec_tpmi_init(struct auxiliary_device *auxdev) tpmi_info->vsec_dev = vsec_dev; tpmi_info->feature_count = vsec_dev->num_resources; + tpmi_info->resource = vsec_dev->resource; tpmi_info->plat_info.bus_number = pci_dev->bus->number; - tpmi_info->tpmi_features = devm_kcalloc(&auxdev->dev, vsec_dev->num_resources, + tpmi_info->tpmi_features = devm_kcalloc(&auxdev->dev, tpmi_info->feature_count, sizeof(*tpmi_info->tpmi_features), GFP_KERNEL); if (!tpmi_info->tpmi_features) return -ENOMEM; - for (i = 0; i < vsec_dev->num_resources; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < tpmi_info->feature_count; i++) { struct intel_tpmi_pm_feature *pfs; struct resource *res; u64 res_start; @@ -764,7 +766,7 @@ static int intel_vsec_tpmi_init(struct auxiliary_device *auxdev) pfs = &tpmi_info->tpmi_features[i]; - res = &vsec_dev->resource[i]; + res = &tpmi_info->resource[i]; if (!res) continue; -- 2.43.0