mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
	Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>,
	Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com>,
	Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] iomap: don't resubmit an ioend after ->writeback_submit() failed
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 11:49:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260924184910.GI2705364@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924091203.198225-2-parri.andrea@gmail.com>

On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 11:11:51AM +0200, Andrea Parri wrote:
> iomap_add_to_ioend() submits the pending ioend through
> ->writeback_submit() before allocating a new one for the current range.
> When the submission fails the helper completes the ioend with an error,
> but iomap_add_to_ioend() returns the error without clearing
> wpc->wb_ctx.  iomap_writepages() then submits whatever wpc->wb_ctx
> points to, so the already completed ioend is submitted a second time.
> 
> For XFS the second bio_endio() lands in xfs_end_bio(), which
> list_add_tail()s the already linked ioend into ip->i_ioend_list.  This
> corrupts the list and leaves a use-after-free/double-free window against
> the ioend completion worker.  Reproduced with a fault-injected
> ->writeback_submit() failure on a reflinked XFS file with several
> CoW writeback ranges in flight: the unfixed kernel hits repeated
> "list_add double add" warnings from __list_add_valid_or_report(),
> the fixed kernel fails writeback cleanly.
> 
> Clear wpc->wb_ctx when ->writeback_submit() fails.  The old
> iomap_submit_ioend() cleared the context unconditionally; that clear was
> lost when submission moved to iomap_ioend_writeback_submit().  The final
> ->writeback_submit() call in iomap_writepages() needs no equivalent fix:
> it is the last thing the function does before returning, and every
> caller allocates its iomap_writepage_ctx on the stack for a single call,
> so wpc->wb_ctx is never read again afterwards.
> 
> Fixes: f4fa7981fa26 ("iomap: hide ioends from the generic writeback code")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.17
> Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
> ---
>  fs/iomap/ioend.c | 10 +++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/ioend.c b/fs/iomap/ioend.c
> index 7bbbb417f9152..32ae292a84cbe 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/ioend.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/ioend.c
> @@ -246,8 +246,16 @@ ssize_t iomap_add_to_ioend(struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc, struct folio *folio,
>  new_ioend:
>  		if (ioend) {
>  			error = wpc->ops->writeback_submit(wpc, 0);
> -			if (error)
> +			if (error) {
> +				/*
> +				 * ->writeback_submit() completed the ioend
> +				 * with an error, so drop the stale context;
> +				 * iomap_writepages() would otherwise submit
> +				 * it a second time.
> +				 */
> +				wpc->wb_ctx = NULL;

I looked around the codebase and saw that iomap_writepages also calls
->writeback_submit.  Does that need to null out wb_ctx?

My guess is that none of the callers do anything with wpc after
iomap_writepages returns so it's not harming anyone, but we should drop
the stale context too, right?

--D

>  				return error;
> +			}
>  		}
>  		wpc->wb_ctx = ioend = iomap_alloc_ioend(wpc, pos, ioend_flags);
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.53.0
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-24 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-24  9:11 [PATCH v2 0/4] iomap: fix error handling regressions Andrea Parri
2026-09-24  9:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] iomap: don't resubmit an ioend after ->writeback_submit() failed Andrea Parri
2026-09-24 18:49   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-09-24  9:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] xfs: add an error tag to inject a ->writeback_submit() failure Andrea Parri
2026-09-24 18:49   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-09-24  9:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] iomap: don't lose a fiemap iteration error when emitting the last extent Andrea Parri
2026-09-24  9:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] iomap: don't lose a failed direct I/O bio's error when zeroing the tail Andrea Parri
2026-09-24 18:53   ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260924184910.GI2705364@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=da.gomez@samsung.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
    --cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®