From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] docs/seccomp: describe the SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_RESTART_BEFORE_RECV flag
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 13:42:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260924204209.477694-4-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924204209.477694-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
From: Cong Wang <cwang@multikernel.io>
Document the new opt-in flag, its listener requirement and interaction
with WAIT_KILLABLE_RECV. Explain syscall re-evaluation and the
cancellation, timeout, fairness and argument-mutation tradeoffs.
Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-6
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cwang@multikernel.io>
---
.../userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst
index cff0fa7f3175..b6875ce54fe2 100644
--- a/Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst
+++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst
@@ -281,6 +281,35 @@ process will ignore non-fatal signals until the response is sent. Signals that
are sent prior to the notification being received by userspace are handled
normally.
+``SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_RESTART_BEFORE_RECV`` can be set at filter installation
+to restart a syscall interrupted while its notification is still awaiting
+receipt, even if the signal handler was installed without ``SA_RESTART``.
+The handler runs, and if it returns normally, syscall entry and the seccomp
+filter are evaluated again. The abandoned notification is removed; a new
+notification is queued if the filter again returns ``SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF``.
+This avoids returning ``EINTR`` before the syscall has executed, including
+for calls such as ``close`` where callers do not retry on ``EINTR``.
+A failed notification receive that resets the notification to its initial
+state is also eligible for restart.
+
+The flag requires ``SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER`` and can be used with
+or without ``SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_WAIT_KILLABLE_RECV``. Using both flags allows
+handlers to run before receipt and defers non-fatal signals during supervisor
+processing after receipt. Without ``SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_WAIT_KILLABLE_RECV``,
+interruptions after receipt retain the existing ``SA_RESTART`` behavior.
+Fatal signals still terminate the notifying process. Neither flag changes
+supervisor-supplied errors or the native syscall's restart behavior after a
+``SECCOMP_USER_NOTIF_FLAG_CONTINUE`` response.
+
+Unconditional restart before receipt is opt-in: a normally returning signal
+handler can no longer cancel that wait with ``EINTR``. Native syscall timeout
+and signal-mask handling have not started during mediation. Repeated signals
+can therefore extend elapsed time and, as restarted notifications join the
+tail of the queue, delay receipt indefinitely. Handlers can also modify memory
+referenced by syscall arguments, so the restarted call must be authorized
+afresh; this flag does not provide an argument snapshot or prevent TOCTOU.
+Existing behavior is unchanged when the flag is absent.
+
It is worth noting that ``struct seccomp_data`` contains the values of register
arguments to the syscall, but does not contain pointers to memory. The task's
memory is accessible to suitably privileged traces via ``ptrace()`` or
--
2.43.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-24 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 20:42 [PATCH 0/3] seccomp: opt in to restarting notifications before receipt Cong Wang
2026-09-24 20:42 ` [PATCH 1/3] seccomp: allow restarting interrupted unreceived notifications Cong Wang
2026-09-24 20:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] selftests/seccomp: cover restart of " Cong Wang
2026-09-24 20:42 ` Cong Wang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260924204209.477694-4-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®