From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marco.crivellari@suse.com,
Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH wq/for-7.4 v2 3/3] workqueue: add a percpu_concurrency_managed workqueue attribute
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 06:09:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260925-wq_final-v2-3-860ee052169e@debian.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260925-wq_final-v2-0-860ee052169e@debian.org>
Introduce percpu_concurrency_managed, similar to the discussion in [1],
and use it when deciding to do concurrency management, instead of
relying on WQ_PERCPU (the only WQ type that does CM as of now).
Do not set it for WQ_BH. BH uses static per-cpu pools too, but it forces
max_active to INT_MAX and does not impose the normal max-active
throttle.
The attr is workqueue-only. wqattrs_clear_for_pool() clears it before
attrs are stored in a worker_pool. Pool selection still uses WQ_PERCPU;
attrs do not switch a workqueue onto static per-cpu pools yet.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/8a1437751a6da2c166284b1ca562fb0a@kernel.org/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
---
include/linux/workqueue.h | 9 +++++++++
kernel/workqueue.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/workqueue.h b/include/linux/workqueue.h
index a283766a192aaf..32747f797c4449 100644
--- a/include/linux/workqueue.h
+++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h
@@ -204,6 +204,15 @@ struct workqueue_attrs {
*/
enum wq_affn_scope affn_scope;
+ /**
+ * @percpu_concurrency_managed: use per-cpu concurrency accounting
+ *
+ * Workqueues with this set meter active work per CPU against
+ * percpu_max_active. Workqueues with this clear either use unbound
+ * max_active accounting or do not impose a max_active limit.
+ */
+ bool percpu_concurrency_managed;
+
/**
* @ordered: work items must be executed one by one in queueing order
*/
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 545332d6118159..7059fc1bd9b090 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -424,9 +424,9 @@ struct workqueue_struct {
static int wq_user_max_active(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
{
- if (wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)
- return READ_ONCE(wq->saved_max_active);
- return READ_ONCE(wq->saved_percpu_max_active);
+ if (READ_ONCE(wq->attrs->percpu_concurrency_managed))
+ return READ_ONCE(wq->saved_percpu_max_active);
+ return READ_ONCE(wq->saved_max_active);
}
/*
@@ -1861,11 +1861,13 @@ static bool pwq_tryinc_nr_active(struct pool_workqueue *pwq, bool fill)
lockdep_assert_held(&pool->lock);
- /*
- * A concurrency-managed per-cpu pool accounts nr_active per pwq, so
- * pwq->nr_active against wq->percpu_max_active is sufficient.
- */
- if (is_percpu_pool(pool)) {
+ /* BH workqueues use per-cpu pools but do not throttle max_active. */
+ if (pool->flags & POOL_BH) {
+ obtained = true;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (READ_ONCE(wq->attrs->percpu_concurrency_managed)) {
obtained = pwq->nr_active < READ_ONCE(wq->percpu_max_active);
goto out;
}
@@ -2091,6 +2093,7 @@ static void node_activate_pending_pwq(struct wq_node_nr_active *nna,
*/
static void pwq_dec_nr_active(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
{
+ struct workqueue_struct *wq = pwq->wq;
struct worker_pool *pool = pwq->pool;
struct wq_node_nr_active *nna;
@@ -2102,16 +2105,15 @@ static void pwq_dec_nr_active(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
*/
pwq->nr_active--;
- /*
- * A concurrency-managed per-cpu pool only needs to kick the first
- * inactive work item on @pwq itself.
- */
- if (is_percpu_pool(pool)) {
+ if (pool->flags & POOL_BH)
+ return;
+
+ if (READ_ONCE(wq->attrs->percpu_concurrency_managed)) {
pwq_activate_first_inactive(pwq, false);
return;
}
- nna = wq_node_nr_active(pwq->wq, pool->node);
+ nna = wq_node_nr_active(wq, pool->node);
/*
* If @pwq is for an unbound workqueue, it's more complicated because
@@ -5034,6 +5036,7 @@ static void copy_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_attrs *to,
* get_unbound_pool() explicitly clears the fields.
*/
to->affn_scope = from->affn_scope;
+ to->percpu_concurrency_managed = from->percpu_concurrency_managed;
to->ordered = from->ordered;
}
@@ -5044,6 +5047,7 @@ static void copy_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_attrs *to,
static void wqattrs_clear_for_pool(struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
{
attrs->affn_scope = WQ_AFFN_NR_TYPES;
+ attrs->percpu_concurrency_managed = false;
attrs->ordered = false;
if (attrs->affn_strict)
cpumask_copy(attrs->cpumask, cpu_possible_mask);
@@ -5851,6 +5855,10 @@ int apply_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
if (WARN_ON(!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)))
return -EINVAL;
+ /* Attrs cannot switch a workqueue to per-cpu pools yet. */
+ if (WARN_ON(attrs->percpu_concurrency_managed))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
ret = apply_workqueue_attrs_locked(wq, attrs);
mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
@@ -5942,6 +5950,10 @@ static struct workqueue_attrs *alloc_wq_std_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
if (wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED)
attrs->ordered = true;
+ /* BH uses per-cpu pools but not max_active concurrency management. */
+ if ((wq->flags & WQ_PERCPU) && !(wq->flags & WQ_BH))
+ attrs->percpu_concurrency_managed = true;
+
return attrs;
}
--
2.53.0-Meta
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-25 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-25 13:09 [PATCH wq/for-7.4 v2 0/3] workqueue: Keep max_active and percpu_max_active in sync Breno Leitao
2026-09-25 13:09 ` [PATCH wq/for-7.4 v2 1/3] workqueue: Move the initial max_active setup into a helper Breno Leitao
2026-09-25 13:09 ` [PATCH wq/for-7.4 v2 2/3] workqueue: Keep the limits of both max_active domains current Breno Leitao
2026-09-28 20:15 ` Tejun Heo
2026-09-25 13:09 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2026-09-28 21:31 ` [PATCH wq/for-7.4 v2 3/3] workqueue: add a percpu_concurrency_managed workqueue attribute Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260925-wq_final-v2-3-860ee052169e@debian.org \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®