From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5164C445ACE; Fri, 25 Sep 2026 09:04:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790327069; cv=none; b=n743/U0f2BDZ/avzRfEQV/tFtX2HUB3xDRL8VStdEkwo8cJNK4jsaHeimbcOGrY5dddmIhRPsdLQeoSFWC4HB8SGOQQI0JLgrDTjLgbxGALnGLcoGUIUpo3r/mNb8eTAsZtjpIl5p7vLKBYiXNZwt8WHeARRqVyAbJynh9kNNLk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790327069; c=relaxed/simple; bh=O/1Hp5SfGXg6AlinpEDgLJGWyCdzxj1JHxR09/jDS8g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=gYedFsmtlzl3euXm25IlolDMxuE7jab7qGWQ1I1bzTUzivdZ9imGhcMSDelC2EBm6vR9L9V4NTHbSnX+i2732kGo1yVXafxaUO9Fppv3Trolqyk94IenWCSgf9SLUXrCRrFc1MaG+Hsook8SXFIhnND+OIx/PzgEg4r+4FCCwB8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=IwNeb3yZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="IwNeb3yZ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EED401F000FF; Fri, 25 Sep 2026 09:04:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790327068; bh=E1aAdlePJGtJE2B/B5CnwjGEy8FWgzy/hnBRYYo53uQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=IwNeb3yZeaGsMwajxduralc04z65qptcNFIL0WbPwzIQvoZ2fFSfkZYB5jBrPAQ/Z VfGLFQJBuJLvUk43v2ADcQQ+0GqF1xk4RY2N2KdMplIE3OUBsnRov/co9IAmp/zJhd CO57ftVBGw0uFKqXcjDjkmtYvxfPuJ4W3Y/Nr4bo51qt7WKa6F/jFS+rxxJQyYtoqT 66Z0lZDYdIHCf/GeRnnJf8wWLlfo6r7775sWZciUWKFFxBfj/TdkHYO1ePbefL9gJw 7vaPwus4QDdYaxX047DpQCY1j+049L7p/9DAnsXDthy2fV/pz4KI48WhYIq75ZB3fr YBDPXR2t/Vclg== Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 10:04:23 +0100 From: Simon Horman To: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org Cc: vulab@iscas.ac.cn, davem@davemloft.net, david+nfc@ixit.cz, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, oe-linux-nfc@lists.linux.dev, pabeni@redhat.com, sameo@linux.intel.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfc: llcp: Fix socket reference leak in nfc_llcp_recv_ui() Message-ID: <20260925090423.GG13925@horms.kernel.org> References: <20260916073424.1971784-1-vulab@iscas.ac.cn> <178989049996.2160803.13194045712273112388@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <178989049996.2160803.13194045712273112388@kernel.org> On Sun, Sep 20, 2026 at 07:48:19AM +0000, netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org wrote: > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential > issue(s) to consider. > > Critical: 0 (1) · High: 1 · Medium: 0 · Low: 0 > > If you believe none of the issues are legitimate, please reply to each > issue of Medium severity or higher and explain why the AI is wrong. > If any of them are legitimate and you plan to respin, please let patchwork > know by including "pw-bot: cr" as a separate line at the end of your reply > (one such reply per series is enough). > > - [High] Incomplete fix: the identical nfc_llcp_sock_get() reference leak > remains at the sibling call site in nfc_llcp_recv_connect()… This concern matches my analysis. I would suggest an updated patch that fixes both functions. > > Pre-existing issues: > - [Critical] Post-handoff SKB access / use-after-free race in > nfc_llcp_recv_ui() (net/nfc/llcp_core.c:902-907): the extra SKB… ...