From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC2AA2D73A0; Fri, 25 Sep 2026 19:10:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790363417; cv=none; b=KAdJbr5GehY8YpAX4UFIUzmjMMvqqPQ3xFPspNAb8dUpmoHjvSxV6EvzRyhHDOnMbawibF3YmAWDK/D5shZDJDL1Eeuliotj8KwnDmHY/LETTIAPap+Qe8utgdetzyBioZz/xFVtb/qCbS2P4L6Z1DEptjDZnb+l/14+St+5dEM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790363417; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zPE7Fpdceg+qVWrlR6SfURBbX130IhK2/zfJ968obXE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=T4+IEPSCYyVqYw/fuwHWQjWhSoG/4DnOUmmFIM6r0xMMODtAZprQ0sCtZddz35PtMPNjsBrJX0uWde7fFV/sz31CyQPCDJSWtAyx75ffPzQmzXEs3T6QRhZlNybJvIs036WcOtairOCGdlbw94toeu+niwmAuK6bW4ww6cQ3GrE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=lta26CTJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="lta26CTJ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C64E1F000FF; Fri, 25 Sep 2026 19:10:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790363416; bh=WIh5MF91TgNDRmG6Qisl3WLz2tFz4iMG+XOqdmL7CGE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=lta26CTJTzuqDDh5KI8mVWRhpEM81U1UcckDr7elT2XmDDv9u3Yu83P5Kh49UB1d7 3RmumOK4R51exJOZZNWGrKtF5MQN87aNO+1fQdjMPzcQisfnSm1Sv3mQpPjr5nVKML ClXq0r1H+aVB7Wb5sxjDOFcwtAuh3SeOaFRNklbtdCY2DF5NQOUE8Q4alUJYQJ7BjU 0WLKQ8Gl14aZLEKpS81xG/puqobi7SQ6pP3/HchhrBK1Sd4KV9rXlWut9JVd7yL2qs c3EtSA68/rbFVVNiAjBjoowFqz46o784ouT6Tas+VISMbCw56jRrP+LfDzqv2gbI6h 4Y8PV2u15/CsQ== Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 12:10:15 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Rodrigo Vivi Cc: Konstantin Sinyuk , , Maarten Lankhorst , Francois Dugast , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Donald Hunter , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , "Paolo Abeni" , Simon Horman , Ilia Levi , , , , Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/12] drm/fabric: vendor-neutral topology infrastructure for scale-up accelerator interconnects Message-ID: <20260925121015.08b8cc15@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20260921131911.532d81f4@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 25 Sep 2026 14:12:25 -0400 Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > I do understand the feeling here :( > > But I do hope that you reconsider your position here. We had such a great > experience with the drm-ras using the netlink and I was really hoping that > we could just reproduce the same experience here. > > Netlink is such an incredible API. > > Would it help if I take the maintainership of this drm-fabric netlink > along with the drm-ras one, ensuring the same consistent and clean usage? Hard call, I have nothing to complain about with the drm-ras work. Purely worried about the time :( Well, that, and DRMs general love of Rust which seems to be about 10x less development efficient for us.. Let's start by feeding this + the spec into your LLM https://github.com/masoncl/review-prompts/blob/main/kernel/subsystem/netlink.md