From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org
Cc: josef@toxicpanda.com, paulmck@kernel.org, frederic@kernel.org,
ast@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, boqun@kernel.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, puranjay@kernel.org,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, martin.lau@kernel.org,
eddyz87@gmail.com, yonghong.song@linux.dev, mason@kernel.org,
ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes: Make optprobe optimizer multi-generational and asynchronous
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2026 11:17:29 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260926111729.f580fa6a8eaac448649fc8e3@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6469f266e0c06de407583746d4f533a03a002fa8d7871124196b0bb568fe38fa@mail.kernel.org>
On Thu, 24 Sep 2026 16:17:38 +0000 (UTC)
bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> > index 6337da5cab9e..1e25980303c4 100644
> > --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> > +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > @@ -530,50 +553,78 @@ static DECLARE_COMPLETION(optimizer_completion);
> >
> > #define OPTIMIZE_DELAY 5
> >
> > +static bool optprobe_has_queued_probes(void)
> > +{
> > + struct optprobe_generation *gen = &optprobe_gens[optprobe_cur_gen];
> > +
> > + return !list_empty(&gen->optimizing_list) ||
> > + !list_empty(&gen->unoptimizing_list);
> > +}
>
> Does this logic need to check gen->freeing_list as well?
Ah, indeed. It should check the freeing_list too.
[ ... ]
>
> > @@ -622,67 +675,119 @@ static void do_free_cleaned_kprobes(void)
> >
> > static void kick_kprobe_optimizer(void);
> >
> > +static void optprobe_generation_rcu_cb(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> > +{
> > + struct optprobe_generation *gen;
> > +
> > + gen = container_of(rcu, struct optprobe_generation, rcu);
> > + WRITE_ONCE(gen->ready, true);
> > + wake_up(&kprobe_optimizer_wait);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void optprobe_finalize_generation(struct optprobe_generation *gen)
> > +{
> > + lockdep_assert_held(&kprobe_mutex);
> > +
> > + scoped_guard(cpus_read_lock) {
> > + guard(mutex)(&text_mutex);
> > +
> > + /* Optimization never be done when disarmed */
> > + if (!kprobes_all_disarmed && kprobes_allow_optimization &&
> > + !list_empty(&gen->optimizing_list))
> > + arch_optimize_kprobes(&gen->optimizing_list);
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Free cleaned kprobes after quiescence period */
> > + do_free_cleaned_kprobes(&gen->freeing_list);
> > +
> > + gen->in_flight = false;
> > + WRITE_ONCE(gen->ready, false);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void optprobe_dispatch_generation(void)
> > +{
> > + struct optprobe_generation *gen;
> > +
> > + lockdep_assert_held(&kprobe_mutex);
> > +
> > + if (!optprobe_can_fire() || !optprobe_has_queued_probes())
> > + return;
> > +
> > + gen = &optprobe_gens[optprobe_cur_gen];
> > +
> > + scoped_guard(cpus_read_lock) {
> > + guard(mutex)(&text_mutex);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Unoptimize kprobes and collect cleaned (unused and disarmed)
> > + * kprobes before waiting for quiescence period.
> > + */
> > + do_unoptimize_kprobes(&gen->unoptimizing_list, &gen->freeing_list);
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Advance cur_gen to the next generation slot */
> > + optprobe_cur_gen = (optprobe_cur_gen + 1) % OPTPROBE_GEN_MAX;
> > +
> > + gen->in_flight = true;
> > + WRITE_ONCE(gen->ready, false);
> > +
> > + call_rcu_tasks(&gen->rcu, optprobe_generation_rcu_cb);
> > +}
>
> Now that kprobe_mutex is dropped during the Tasks RCU grace period, can
> an aggregator probe that was unoptimized but is still in use be freed
> while a task is still preempted inside its detour buffer?
Good catch! Yes, we need to keep tracking the unoptimized but not
freed kprobes until finalize it.
[ ... ]
>
> > @@ -707,12 +812,11 @@ static void wait_for_kprobe_optimizer_locked(void)
> > {
> > lockdep_assert_held(&kprobe_mutex);
> >
> > - while (!list_empty(&optimizing_list) || !list_empty(&unoptimizing_list)) {
> > + while (optprobe_optimizer_busy()) {
> > init_completion(&optimizer_completion);
> > - /*
> > - * Set state to OPTIMIZER_ST_FLUSHING and wake up the thread if it's
> > - * idle. If it's already kicked, it will see the state change.
> > - */
> > + optprobe_flush_requested = true;
> > +
> > + /* Wake up optimizer thread */
> > if (atomic_xchg_acquire(&optimizer_state,
> > OPTIMIZER_ST_FLUSHING) != OPTIMIZER_ST_FLUSHING)
> > wake_up(&kprobe_optimizer_wait);
>
> Andrea Parri raised a concern on 2026-09-24 about a race condition in
> this code (https://lore.kernel.org/all/arTuBodyGqQ0mErI@andreayoga.localdomain/).
Yes, so I pick his patch at first and rebase this on it.
Thanks,
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-26 2:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 2:23 [PATCH v5 00/13] rcu-tasks: build Tasks RCU on Tasks Trace readers in trampolines Josef Bacik
2026-09-22 2:23 ` [PATCH v5 01/13] entry: Pass pt_regs to irqentry_exit_cond_resched() Josef Bacik
2026-09-22 2:23 ` [PATCH v5 02/13] rcu-tasks: Add a Tasks RCU implementation for reader-marked trampolines Josef Bacik
2026-09-22 9:26 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-09-22 2:23 ` [PATCH v5 03/13] kprobes: Expose the optprobe jump window to Tasks RCU Josef Bacik
2026-09-22 3:22 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-23 7:45 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-09-23 13:51 ` [PATCH] kprobes: Make optprobe optimizer multi-generational and asynchronous Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-09-23 15:12 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-09-23 16:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-24 0:35 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-09-24 9:31 ` Andrea Parri
2026-09-24 16:17 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-26 2:17 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2026-09-22 2:23 ` [PATCH v5 04/13] ftrace: Mark modules hosting direct-call trampolines for Tasks RCU Josef Bacik
2026-09-22 2:23 ` [PATCH v5 05/13] x86/ftrace: Take a Tasks Trace reader around ftrace_caller's call-out Josef Bacik
2026-09-22 2:23 ` [PATCH v5 06/13] x86/kprobes: Take a Tasks Trace reader in the optprobe template Josef Bacik
2026-09-22 3:22 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-22 2:23 ` [PATCH v5 07/13] bpf, x86: Take a Tasks Trace reader in the trampoline around its call-outs Josef Bacik
2026-09-22 3:22 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-23 2:16 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-22 2:23 ` [PATCH v5 08/13] arm64: ftrace: Take a Tasks Trace reader around ftrace_caller's call-out Josef Bacik
2026-09-22 2:23 ` [PATCH v5 09/13] bpf, arm64: Take a Tasks Trace reader in the trampoline around its call-outs Josef Bacik
2026-09-22 2:23 ` [PATCH v5 10/13] samples: ftrace: Make the direct-call trampolines Tasks Trace readers Josef Bacik
2026-09-22 3:35 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-22 2:23 ` [PATCH v5 11/13] rcutorture: Make Tasks RCU readers Tasks Trace readers where required Josef Bacik
2026-09-22 2:23 ` [PATCH v5 12/13] rcu-tasks-trace: Assert no reader is held on return to userspace Josef Bacik
2026-09-22 3:11 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-22 2:23 ` [PATCH v5 13/13] x86, arm64: Build Tasks RCU on Tasks Trace readers in trampolines Josef Bacik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260926111729.f580fa6a8eaac448649fc8e3@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=mason@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®