From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64EBE1D416C; Sat, 26 Sep 2026 12:19:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790425178; cv=none; b=UJjUy9azHVu0cfn0dgNO58he2F+p35L1LKbT+UU9zlejtu/JQWjv7ximMm3TEtHRDbEa1tFws+uRr1j/Tj9x0ZfRKlBmpvgL6GowHJR7s19Krmwrg3qdMgXBe+c++xFSa2zeQEnM5pL8HOJzO80ugVjqOb1GodWrXT+e/MJUbfQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790425178; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qlGSy0PTIhBUGANsbdLhCUouY4VF8b69xbG82UNGlAI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KLTLWvv20wusF9oXBEapX2mMt9N9P8CqN9JqrZUJXMw3EaCveqBmTMMr/NiLkvLeKhklcw3PJSyUoclLUNBKEHO5Os2rMOfj5IJgul+a9RyskdTsWMfFqWRnwb6Bki8KXwbekFF1EdGR0IVC9YjhV6Gz18kuFtfPL6lseg588cg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=fUXIg6Sj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="fUXIg6Sj" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 20C6B1F000FF; Sat, 26 Sep 2026 12:19:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790425176; bh=fX1UOorzk2WNkUzS8vq28akGhPcRScYxSKIHc7khZsE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=fUXIg6SjJk+Qr1M0g3x4kQiPdWY0pMcyzGHOa/cNhZMob/KEO2PpiVHQtdd6QWG3x dZ1y+306fsaJBZodcxplS8L82NhW9YwwaaW61njzxIIsMh2aygiTjvDyx579LwgTlk TiNEAn/LIYOFBCadmux7/TrQTROL8C9DBsngCTXN5FvYS+wlAGeerAjS/qGI8F8zSt zNqskNZyO093mE4xSamxYt4pPd91MQE+lyJXBwlx8zyyl/XlWLoHwQD1qUMS1tbOL6 bgAKynwX99Ez+3lc/SWDJSSB8c5kqNCTcs0gDxMX99zbcw5tfAFyKVemNQNOkTs/aX D6EfHEKDJYwZw== Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2026 13:19:27 +0100 From: Nathan Chancellor To: Andreas Schwab Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , Theodore Ts'o , "Jason A. Donenfeld" , Vincenzo Frascino , Nick Desaulniers , Bill Wendling , Justin Stitt , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , Huacai Chen , WANG Xuerui , Madhavan Srinivasan , Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Alexandre Ghiti , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Alexander Gordeev , Christian Borntraeger , Sven Schnelle , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] random: vDSO: Avoid call to memset() when zeroing reserved in __cvdso_getrandom_data() Message-ID: <20260926121927.GA1486962@ax162> References: <20260925-vdso-getrandom-avoid-memset-llvm-24-v2-1-ce640f872393@kernel.org> <87zex4ic68.fsf@linux-m68k.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87zex4ic68.fsf@linux-m68k.org> On Sat, Sep 26, 2026 at 11:39:43AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Sep 25 2026, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > > +#if __has_builtin(__builtin_memset_inline) > > +#define memset_inline(dst, value, size) __builtin_memset_inline(dst, value, size) > > +#elif IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CC_HAS_OPT_INLINE_MEMSET) > > +#define memset_inline(dst, value, size) __builtin_memset(dst, value, size) > > +#else > > +static inline void *memset_inline(void *dst, int value, size_t size) > > +{ > > + char *d = dst; > > + > > + while (size--) > > + *d++ = value; > > + > > + return d; > > +} > > +#endif > > + > > memset actually returns the original pointer, not the incremented one. > Nothing uses the return value of memset_inline here, but it is > confusing. Whoops, good catch, I guess my fingers gave up on those last two characters :) I will fix this for v3 once there has been some time for further review. -- Cheers, Nathan