mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ömer Mete Kaya" <omermetekaya0@gmail.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net
Cc: john.fastabend@gmail.com, andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com,
	memxor@gmail.com, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
	yonghong.song@linux.dev, jolsa@kernel.org, emil@etsalapatis.com,
	ihor.solodrai@linux.dev, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Ömer Mete Kaya" <omermetekaya0@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/1] bpf: Remove redundant second __reg_deduce_bounds() call in reg_bounds_sync()
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2026 23:02:32 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260926200313.281893-2-omermetekaya0@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260926200313.281893-1-omermetekaya0@gmail.com>

reg_bounds_sync() calls __reg_deduce_bounds() twice in a row.
With the current cnum implementation, the second call is now redundant.

__reg_deduce_bounds() first intersects r32 with the 32-bit values
representable by r64, then intersects r64 with the values allowed by
r32. After one call, cnum64_cnum32_intersect() guarantees that every
value in r64 has its corresponding u32 value in r32. So, a
second call cannot further restrict either view.

The old tnum + min/max representation could require multiple passes:
tightening one of the 32-bit or 64-bit views could allow the other to
be tightened further. The double call ensured that the bounds reached
a fixpoint. With cnum, the first call already reaches the fixpoint.

Signed-off-by: Ömer Mete Kaya <omermetekaya0@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 8d8923ad5..1cd923363 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -2180,7 +2180,6 @@ static void reg_bounds_sync(struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
 	__update_reg_bounds(reg);
 	/* We might have learned something about the sign bit. */
 	__reg_deduce_bounds(reg);
-	__reg_deduce_bounds(reg);
 	/* We might have learned some bits from the bounds. */
 	__reg_bound_offset(reg);
 	/* Intersecting with the old var_off might have improved our bounds
--
2.55.0


      reply	other threads:[~2026-09-26 20:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-26 20:02 [RFC PATCH bpf-next 0/1] bpf: Remove redundant " Ömer Mete Kaya
2026-09-26 20:02 ` Ömer Mete Kaya [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260926200313.281893-2-omermetekaya0@gmail.com \
    --to=omermetekaya0@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®