From: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>
To: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, codemender-patching+linux@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firewire: core: add __counted_by_ptr attribute to struct fw_device
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2026 10:49:26 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260927014926.GC9201@sakamocchi.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260925212552.125652-1-morbo@google.com>
On Fri, Sep 25, 2026 at 09:25:52PM +0000, Bill Wendling wrote:
> The GCC and Clang attribute '__counted_by_ptr' associates a pointer
> field with an integer field holding its element count. This enables
> runtime bounds checking by KASAN and UBSAN to prevent out-of-bounds
> accesses to the pointer.
>
> In 'struct fw_device' (defined in 'include/linux/firewire.h'), the
> field 'config_rom' is a pointer to the device's Configuration ROM data,
> and its associated element count is stored in 'config_rom_length'.
>
> Additionally, update the existing KUnit test in
> 'drivers/firewire/device-attribute-test.c' where 'config_rom_length'
> was incorrectly initialized with the byte size
> ('sizeof(simple_avc_config_rom)') instead of the element count
> ('ARRAY_SIZE(simple_avc_config_rom)'). This ensures the
> '__counted_by_ptr' bounds-checking annotation does not trigger any
> false-positive panics or compile/runtime checks.
>
> Cc: codemender-patching+linux@google.com
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
> ---
> drivers/firewire/device-attribute-test.c | 4 ++--
> include/linux/firewire.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Thank you to correct the KUnit tests as well. Applied to for-next branch.
Thanks
Takashi Sakamoto
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-27 1:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-25 21:25 Bill Wendling
2026-09-27 1:49 ` Takashi Sakamoto [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260927014926.GC9201@sakamocchi.jp \
--to=o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp \
--cc=codemender-patching+linux@google.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®