From: Yu Zhang <yuz08559@gmail.com>
To: mkp@kernel.org
Cc: michael.christie@oracle.com, d.bogdanov@yadro.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yu Zhang <yuz08559@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: target: Disable interrupts while holding delayed_cmd_lock
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2026 19:13:29 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260927091329.13482-1-yuz08559@gmail.com> (raw)
target_do_delayed_work() takes dev->delayed_cmd_lock with a plain
spin_lock(). It runs from system_percpu_wq, so interrupts stay enabled
while the lock is held. Every other acquisition of that lock uses
spin_lock_irqsave(): target_handle_task_attr() and
transport_complete_ordered_sync() in target_core_transport.c, and
target_non_ordered_release() in target_core_device.c.
That was safe while every caller of transport_complete_task_attr() ran
in process context: target_complete_ok_work() from
target_completion_wq, transport_complete_qf() from dev->qf_work_queue,
and transport_generic_request_failure() from the submit and execute
paths.
Since commit 06933066d88a ("scsi: target: Add support for completing
commands from backend context") that is no longer true. With
complete_type=1 on a fabric that sets direct_compl_supp,
target_complete() runs target_complete_ok_work() inline in the
backend's completion context, which target_complete_cmd_with_sense()
documents as "May be called from interrupt context". For iblock that
is the bio end_io.
target_complete_ok_work() starts with transport_complete_task_attr(),
which takes delayed_cmd_lock in two ways:
- Every ORDERED command is put on dev->delayed_cmd_list by
target_handle_task_attr() and dispatched from there by
target_do_delayed_work(), which marks it SCF_TASK_ORDERED_SYNC.
Its completion therefore goes through
transport_complete_ordered_sync().
- A SIMPLE command that completes while an ORDERED command is pending
drops the last reference to the killed dev->non_ordered, and
percpu_ref_put() then runs target_non_ordered_release() in the
completing context.
Both take the lock and, if commands are waiting, call
schedule_work(&dev->delayed_cmd_work), which queues on
system_percpu_wq, i.e. on the CPU that took the completion. Further
completions for the same queue are typically delivered there too, so
one arriving while the work holds the lock spins on it forever.
Reaching this needs complete_type=1, which is not the default
(vhost-scsi, the only fabric with direct_compl_supp, defaults to
TARGET_QUEUE_COMPL), a backend whose I/O completes from interrupt
context, and ORDERED commands from the initiator. Linux virtio_scsi
guests send only VIRTIO_SCSI_S_SIMPLE and never take the ordered path;
any guest that uses the ORDERED task attribute, which vhost-scsi
accepts, does.
target_do_delayed_work() is a work item and always runs in process
context, so spin_lock_irq() is sufficient.
Found by inspection; no runtime report. A single ORDERED command goes
through both acquisitions, so with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING the first one
completed through direct completion should produce an inconsistent
lock state report on delayed_cmd_lock (hardirq or softirq, depending on
where the backend completes).
Fixes: 06933066d88a ("scsi: target: Add support for completing commands from backend context")
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <yuz08559@gmail.com>
---
drivers/target/target_core_transport.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
index dcfe945..67c0465 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
@@ -2359,7 +2359,7 @@ void target_do_delayed_work(struct work_struct *work)
struct se_device *dev = container_of(work, struct se_device,
delayed_cmd_work);
- spin_lock(&dev->delayed_cmd_lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&dev->delayed_cmd_lock);
while (!dev->ordered_sync_in_progress) {
struct se_cmd *cmd;
@@ -2380,12 +2380,12 @@ void target_do_delayed_work(struct work_struct *work)
dev->ordered_sync_in_progress = true;
list_del(&cmd->se_delayed_node);
- spin_unlock(&dev->delayed_cmd_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&dev->delayed_cmd_lock);
__target_execute_cmd(cmd, true);
- spin_lock(&dev->delayed_cmd_lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&dev->delayed_cmd_lock);
}
- spin_unlock(&dev->delayed_cmd_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&dev->delayed_cmd_lock);
}
static void transport_complete_ordered_sync(struct se_cmd *cmd)
--
2.43.0
reply other threads:[~2026-09-27 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260927091329.13482-1-yuz08559@gmail.com \
--to=yuz08559@gmail.com \
--cc=d.bogdanov@yadro.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.christie@oracle.com \
--cc=mkp@kernel.org \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®