From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>,
Bradley Morgan <brads@mainlining.org>,
Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, lkmm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH hazptr 4/4] hazptr: Introduce "try acquire" fast path, fallback to overflow list
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2026 11:51:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260927155134.4740-5-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260927155134.4740-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Introduce a "try acquire" hazard pointer fast path, which performs an
early load of the address to store it into the hazard pointer slot, and
then re-loads that address after a barrier to check whether it has
changed meanwhile.
On comparison failure, rather than re-try, guarantee forward progress by
falling back to the __hazptr_acquire slow path on failure.
The acquire slow path attempts a try-acquire for any available per-CPU
slot. If that fails, it chains the backup slot into the overflow list,
therefore guaranteeing forward progress for both hazard pointer
read-side and synchronize:
- Readers set the wildcard, and then proceed to set the more
specific address to replace the wildcard.
- One synchronize alternates between two overflow list periods,
scanning each one while readers are added to the other period,
thus preventing a steady flow of readers from preventing
synchronize forward progress.
With this change, the scan on per-CPU slots don't need to expect a
wildcard anymore, because none can be produced by readers. Wildcards are
only expected within overflow lists.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>
Cc: Bradley Morgan <brads@mainlining.org>
Cc: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Cc: <rcu@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <lkmm@lists.linux.dev>
---
include/linux/hazptr.h | 47 +++++++++++--------
kernel/hazptr.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
2 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/hazptr.h b/include/linux/hazptr.h
index d1670121947a..fcf017ca2255 100644
--- a/include/linux/hazptr.h
+++ b/include/linux/hazptr.h
@@ -29,9 +29,6 @@
/* 4 slots (each sizeof(hazptr_slot_item)) fit in a single 64-byte cache line. */
#define NR_HAZPTR_PERCPU_SLOTS 4
-/* The current hazard pointer wildcard. */
-extern void *hazptr_wildcard;
-
/*
* Hazard pointer slot.
*/
@@ -190,6 +187,31 @@ void hazptr_note_context_switch(void)
}
}
+/* Try hazard pointer protection. */
+static inline
+void *__hazptr_try_acquire(struct hazptr_ctx *ctx, void * const *addr_p, struct hazptr_slot *slot)
+{
+ void *early_addr, *addr;
+
+ if (unlikely(slot->addr))
+ return NULL;
+ early_addr = READ_ONCE(*addr_p); /* Early load. */
+ WRITE_ONCE(slot->addr, early_addr); /* Store B */
+ /* Memory ordering: Store B before Load A. */
+ smp_mb();
+ addr = READ_ONCE(*addr_p); /* Load A */
+ /*
+ * Validate that address did not change between Early load and Load A.
+ * Use ptr_eq() to make sure that result from Load A is returned to the
+ * caller to preserve address dependency.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(!ptr_eq(addr, early_addr))) {
+ WRITE_ONCE(slot->addr, NULL);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ return addr;
+}
+
/**
* hazptr_acquire - Load pointer at address and protect with hazard pointer.
*
@@ -245,24 +267,9 @@ void *hazptr_acquire(struct hazptr_ctx *ctx, void * const *addr_p)
ctx->acquire_cpu = smp_processor_id();
ctx->acquire_caller = _THIS_IP_;
#endif
- if (unlikely(slot->addr))
+ addr = __hazptr_try_acquire(ctx, addr_p, slot);
+ if (unlikely(!addr))
return __hazptr_acquire(ctx, addr_p);
- WRITE_ONCE(slot->addr, READ_ONCE(hazptr_wildcard)); /* Store B */
-
- /* Memory ordering: Store B before Load A. */
- smp_mb();
-
- /*
- * Load @addr_p after storing wildcard to the hazard pointer slot.
- */
- addr = READ_ONCE(*addr_p); /* Load A */
-
- /*
- * We don't care about ordering of Store C. It will simply
- * replace the wildcard by a more specific address. If addr is
- * NULL, we simply store NULL into the slot.
- */
- WRITE_ONCE(slot->addr, addr); /* Store C */
slot_item->ctx.ctx = ctx;
ctx->slot = slot;
return addr;
diff --git a/kernel/hazptr.c b/kernel/hazptr.c
index 13faa5ba7677..3ca73b56a5c2 100644
--- a/kernel/hazptr.c
+++ b/kernel/hazptr.c
@@ -13,17 +13,9 @@
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(hazptr_phase_lock); /* Protect the wildcard and list phase flip. */
+#define HAZPTR_WILDCARD ((void *) 1UL)
-/*
- * The current hazard pointer wildcard. Flips between 1UL and 2UL to guarantee
- * hazptr_synchronize forward progress even with a steady stream of readers.
- * This wildcard value is used by acquire to temporarily tag the per-CPU slots.
- * This also affects the overflow list selection: the current list used by
- * readers is array[(unsigned long) hazptr_wildcard - 1].
- */
-void *hazptr_wildcard = (void *) 1UL;
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hazptr_wildcard);
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(hazptr_phase_lock); /* Protect the list phase flip. */
/* The current overflow list phase. */
static unsigned int hazptr_overflow_list_phase;
@@ -41,6 +33,10 @@ struct hazptr_overflow_list {
* successively iterates on both lists. Therefore, only list removals
* can cause the iteration to retry, and the number of removals is
* limited to the number of list elements.
+ *
+ * Due to the overflow list raw spin lock, the hazard pointer readers are
+ * blocking, starvation-free with bounded waiting, assuming bounded critical
+ * sections and no NMI or virtualization-induced holder preemption.
*/
struct hazptr_overflow_list_flip {
struct hazptr_overflow_list array[2];
@@ -51,26 +47,12 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct hazptr_overflow_list_flip, percpu_overflow_list_fli
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct hazptr_percpu_slots, hazptr_percpu_slots);
EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL_GPL(hazptr_percpu_slots);
-static
-void *flip_wildcard(void *wildcard)
-{
- return ((unsigned long) wildcard == 1UL) ? (void *) 2UL : (void *) 1UL;
-}
-
static
unsigned int flip_list_phase(unsigned int phase)
{
return 1 - phase;
}
-static
-bool is_wildcard(void *addr)
-{
- if ((unsigned long) addr == 1UL || (unsigned long) addr == 2UL)
- return true;
- return false;
-}
-
static
struct hazptr_slot *hazptr_get_free_percpu_slot(struct hazptr_ctx *ctx)
{
@@ -96,16 +78,36 @@ struct hazptr_slot *hazptr_get_free_percpu_slot(struct hazptr_ctx *ctx)
*/
void *__hazptr_acquire(struct hazptr_ctx *ctx, void * const *addr_p)
{
- struct hazptr_slot *slot = hazptr_get_free_percpu_slot(ctx);
+ struct hazptr_slot *slot;
void *addr;
/*
- * If all the per-CPU slots are already in use, fallback
- * to the backup slot.
+ * In case we are called due to nested use of hazard pointers,
+ * try a slot protection with per-CPU slots.
*/
- if (unlikely(!slot))
- slot = hazptr_chain_backup_slot(ctx);
- WRITE_ONCE(slot->addr, READ_ONCE(hazptr_wildcard)); /* Store B */
+ slot = hazptr_get_free_percpu_slot(ctx);
+ if (likely(slot)) {
+ addr = __hazptr_try_acquire(ctx, addr_p, slot);
+ if (addr) {
+ ctx->slot = slot;
+ return addr;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * The backup slot overflow list guarantees forward progress of both
+ * hazard pointer readers and synchronize:
+ *
+ * - Readers set the wildcard, and then proceed to set the more
+ * specific address to replace the wildcard.
+ *
+ * - One synchronize alternates between two overflow list periods,
+ * scanning each one while readers are added to the other period,
+ * thus preventing a steady flow of readers from preventing
+ * synchronize forward progress.
+ */
+ slot = hazptr_chain_backup_slot(ctx);
+ WRITE_ONCE(slot->addr, HAZPTR_WILDCARD); /* Store B */
/* Memory ordering: Store B before Load A. */
smp_mb();
@@ -121,20 +123,21 @@ void *__hazptr_acquire(struct hazptr_ctx *ctx, void * const *addr_p)
* NULL, we simply store NULL into the slot.
*/
WRITE_ONCE(slot->addr, addr); /* Store C */
+
ctx->slot = slot;
- if (!addr && hazptr_slot_is_backup(ctx, slot))
+ if (!addr)
hazptr_unchain_backup_slot(ctx);
return addr;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__hazptr_acquire);
/*
- * Perform piecewise iteration on overflow list waiting until "addr" is
- * not present. Raw spinlock is released and taken between each list
- * item and busy loop iteration. The overflow list generation is checked
- * each time the lock is taken to validate that the list has not changed
- * before resuming iteration or busy wait. If the generation has
- * changed, retry the entire list traversal.
+ * Perform piecewise iteration on overflow list waiting until "addr" and
+ * wildcard are not present. Raw spinlock is released and taken between each
+ * list item and busy loop iteration. The overflow list generation is checked
+ * each time the lock is taken to validate that the list has not changed before
+ * resuming iteration or busy wait. If the generation has changed, retry the
+ * entire list traversal.
*/
static
void hazptr_synchronize_overflow_list(struct hazptr_overflow_list *overflow_list, void *addr)
@@ -147,13 +150,11 @@ void hazptr_synchronize_overflow_list(struct hazptr_overflow_list *overflow_list
retry:
snapshot_gen = overflow_list->gen;
hlist_for_each_entry(backup_slot, &overflow_list->head, overflow_node) {
- /* Busy-wait if node is found. */
+ /* Busy-wait if addr or wildcard are found. */
for (;;) {
void *load_addr = smp_load_acquire(&backup_slot->slot.addr); /* Load B */
- /* We don't expect wildcards in overflow list. */
- WARN_ON_ONCE(is_wildcard(load_addr));
- if (load_addr != addr)
+ if (load_addr != addr && load_addr != HAZPTR_WILDCARD)
break;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&overflow_list->lock, flags);
cpu_relax();
@@ -174,7 +175,7 @@ void hazptr_synchronize_overflow_list(struct hazptr_overflow_list *overflow_list
}
static
-void hazptr_synchronize_cpu_slots(int cpu, void *addr, void *scan_wildcard)
+void hazptr_synchronize_cpu_slots(int cpu, void *addr)
{
struct hazptr_percpu_slots *percpu_slots = per_cpu_ptr(&hazptr_percpu_slots, cpu);
unsigned int idx;
@@ -182,13 +183,13 @@ void hazptr_synchronize_cpu_slots(int cpu, void *addr, void *scan_wildcard)
for (idx = 0; idx < NR_HAZPTR_PERCPU_SLOTS; idx++) {
struct hazptr_slot_item *item = &percpu_slots->items[idx];
- /* Busy-wait if node is found. */
- smp_cond_load_acquire(&item->slot.addr, VAL != addr && VAL != scan_wildcard); /* Load B */
+ /* Busy-wait if addr is found. */
+ smp_cond_load_acquire(&item->slot.addr, VAL != addr); /* Load B */
}
}
static
-void hazptr_scan_cpu_slots_period(void *addr, void *scan_wildcard)
+void hazptr_scan_cpu_slots(void *addr)
{
int cpu;
@@ -196,16 +197,13 @@ void hazptr_scan_cpu_slots_period(void *addr, void *scan_wildcard)
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
/*
* Scan CPU slots.
- * Forward progress against recurring wildcards is guaranteed
- * by scanning for one wildcard while new elements use the
- * other wildcard value (1UL vs 2UL).
* Forward progress against recurring single hazard pointer
* values is guaranteed by the fact that a hazard pointer
* is not reclaimed nor reused until the scan for that hazard
* pointer completes, which prevents a steady flow of readers
* to acquire that same hazard pointer value.
*/
- hazptr_synchronize_cpu_slots(cpu, addr, scan_wildcard);
+ hazptr_synchronize_cpu_slots(cpu, addr);
}
}
@@ -237,7 +235,6 @@ void hazptr_scan_overflow_list_period(void *addr, unsigned int scan_idx)
void hazptr_synchronize(void *addr)
{
unsigned int scan_list_phase;
- void *scan_wildcard;
/*
* Busy-wait should only be done from preemptible context.
@@ -251,16 +248,14 @@ void hazptr_synchronize(void *addr)
*/
if (!addr)
return;
+
/* Memory ordering: Store A before Load B. */
smp_mb();
guard(mutex)(&hazptr_phase_lock);
/* Scan per-CPU slots. */
- scan_wildcard = flip_wildcard(hazptr_wildcard);
- hazptr_scan_cpu_slots_period(addr, scan_wildcard);
- WRITE_ONCE(hazptr_wildcard, scan_wildcard); /* Flip the current wildcard. */
- hazptr_scan_cpu_slots_period(addr, flip_wildcard(scan_wildcard));
+ hazptr_scan_cpu_slots(addr);
/*
* Scan overflow lists *after* scanning per-CPU slots. See
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-27 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-27 15:51 [PATCH hazptr 0/4] Hazard pointer updates Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-09-27 15:51 ` [PATCH hazptr 1/4] hazptr: Fix two-phase hazptr_synchronize race with detach Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-09-27 15:51 ` [PATCH hazptr 2/4] compiler.h: Introduce ptr_eq() to preserve address dependency Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-09-27 15:51 ` [PATCH hazptr 3/4] Documentation: RCU: Refer to ptr_eq() Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-09-27 15:51 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2026-09-27 16:40 ` [PATCH hazptr 4/4] hazptr: Introduce "try acquire" fast path, fallback to overflow list Boqun Feng
2026-09-27 17:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-09-27 17:24 ` Boqun Feng
2026-09-27 17:36 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-09-27 18:16 ` Boqun Feng
2026-09-27 17:26 ` Boqun Feng
2026-09-27 22:39 ` Gary Guo
2026-09-28 9:12 ` Boqun Feng
2026-09-28 11:32 ` Gary Guo
2026-09-28 14:56 ` Bradley Morgan
2026-09-28 15:32 ` Boqun Feng
2026-09-28 9:27 ` Kunwu Chan
2026-09-27 16:07 ` [PATCH hazptr 0/4] Hazard pointer updates Bradley Morgan
2026-09-27 16:27 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-09-27 16:33 ` Bradley Morgan
2026-09-27 16:45 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-09-27 16:15 ` Boqun Feng
2026-09-27 16:20 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-09-27 16:22 ` Bradley Morgan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260927155134.4740-5-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=brads@mainlining.org \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkmm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®