From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pz2-f41.google.com (mail-pz2-f41.google.com [74.125.228.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83708429008 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2026 19:09:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.228.41 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790536172; cv=none; b=jCTe4PzFqdy15RwHnL1qgVRhB+Do5B5XYHwg2wf3RCCPLwZ3n2gX1zWl0P6uGeW3Zp7mGfJBd5bc/GfhZtd26XCKV95B6M2mjNVzR7j6R0ZHmIuiGFBLtio6eLcrqyXWV8y47Xd7ua2I5ScrgkU9AaWiz0MYnBXcSi70a8KuzGE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790536172; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/Ncv4pmHB2k5k4a6mo3lzenG6x84qqCfM0wTLNgXudw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=n7W/MTEGZAFr4kELm5UFvH0g6hTA7G+2AQwY5QNLPLPNb3ObW46hZ77ltz9/UihZek/HRqHO6vuB8Cn7EZNFW/A3xVDAAc/TbAocyQot7gGFA7JgxT90wuZNsBdGtLklEXYx5McWXYy0SVztVyPDsN9VRGObS7PI41iaQrtLpvE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=N7WKBKll; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.228.41 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="N7WKBKll" Received: by mail-pz2-f41.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-86212a185dcso1699879b3a.1 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2026 12:09:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1790536171; x=1791140971; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=OPb2gJjQHkq+JlwtbOznBiTNAc1qQBhHXizpCBFuJII=; b=N7WKBKll8PWhnGQ1FyXM1gC3akstDhXuQvYgtpMaF1ek2oO1W1j0eSc9bEi4miPqa8 VSUsm97a3IZLk8yS2LoHAA7TRKip3Zn8kvwHFYVZucb46fYp7+PPIGL4AGgpF9ek2E3O oAAYh93be1C8yuOqHPDBYnjzkRj2KmmVA1VXkCByWjwJ3vqJ7oxPIx6UoIJGjlh7seP9 7UKb0fH1/zYaKWK4PHUDiw1L3Tg8Xvrg2/y3069ttozpaF0Q43EnexupM4tvYJ/Ig4b8 xHE6U03/kLQWaM6z9vPGew6OXTHrDIvpum86R46o2DbbDcO+3b35xibdQ0q4kuDr/87/ uMtQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20260707; t=1790536171; x=1791140971; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=OPb2gJjQHkq+JlwtbOznBiTNAc1qQBhHXizpCBFuJII=; b=qc3gWcQJxM7vogK0//ONz9JN3bUkSDCnyVbDsCy0Erah/t46CGpRZ2WIh7P71SX0Se tQmJ7zmnBaoySFOS+OkLgAlYOZBx5xAekb0e+8wGKsk/vCbM4SV/7kLeRLb/uMJcyuOd 0z1/Wj+AoqHeVrzL0JxTlvppa02Rqsj7KaPjX1N+CaVCuDQaRJmy4HTgfOawNfPe+AI0 hU6m/fzMIfkAeoEeXvR/ULhHv55RPUoRnmKOgcXNIWUqM+UsXF6K8b4T28YbECMPqhj7 OkjRp20NN11rFaR5DeqvsZtpuCLcQjjcnCTBGhg8NOdWyE/PBfug8663k77QKeCKqK0K 17HQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AKwUvBwU9rZvVPu1BM+BAmMuoK1xD/4famAA3+nTMbfy0h7i5pt+WHd8HO05fC2bPMS1HAZ06rJgsFKfylEwNM4=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AFuF++nhBMk27g66/2Jcx5hoeir9gajmOgEvwUn6d3SMT+B/Dy/GCCjO YvJ1hJ0BmDMWUTJmTTf4Tebvb8KcvYZAAgLiX5i1dh8nhD6hwnYBYJmN X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou2CB5HvKpLyAjDhrDyD3I9kmH4pCRDXO2c2c6/6mWkiZpIPNwsW0EgVPIiUfPv u9t99neBUALS3mlAiZYm5qbBlp/ZJRc3rZh8z8ZBN7nn+UIq6fspShDN0w+UBUrvCWXhd3AgVZZ C0f19fAuXdpBDT40ydmw2B9w+WPW8jvEGo+TKTUaRlAwtfAsPzxmexmrNof+fk8s3S+HNapTU4g Nnfx48iK9/QDg1dq65zFtcQsn8cpRZGCLLgG4+Nz1aCiovDU9A5QGt5AqFpzVUFk0SaD8qRTJEP BPlWf8J9/xyPxdzwKnQil0S8VfarURvpzubN9nUFl6qNsoyP+liPk2IwktzdlsKKHGss/Nta8sT ywaTkli/k4hrkbQk2x6N1Nh7B2CUdskfwbWFkg+3hynVfceyuqtCIFA7xCyL6cTVyzmwqkYjECS rKppUoSDUV+OaUHpRv/ce14laVoXxoF6dYBZZfIOPGquQcX7iM1jGZq2JlCibCMmM4iquRwoiqn UMu3bsvyijUXbNddmQrbRZsXYZr7y9fsj2B1+AhmtJaRMrnvYjoA1w8WQUP6IrNZcYiGB0c5Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2347:b0:881:e266:c3f1 with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-881e266c8fdmr2589039b3a.21.1790536170813; Sun, 27 Sep 2026 12:09:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Inspiron-14-5420.. ([2402:e280:21c6:671:6651:2efb:bfb:bd73]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-87feb385ed8sm3204478b3a.45.2026.09.27.12.09.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 27 Sep 2026 12:09:29 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hemendra M. Naik" To: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, hemendranaik@gmail.com, horms@kernel.org, jhs@mojatatu.com, jiri@resnulli.us, kuba@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org, tahiliani@nitk.edu.in, vishy0777@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 2/3] selftests: tc-testing: add fq_pie per-flow class stats test Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 00:39:15 +0530 Message-Id: <20260927190915.12527-1-hemendranaik@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <179028364138.2160803.8521628163584007831@kernel.org> References: <179028364138.2160803.8521628163584007831@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Thank you for the review. Our response to the low-severity comment is inline below. > [Severity: Low] > This is a robustness point, not a bug. fq_pie_walk() in > net/sched/sch_fq_pie.c only dumps flows that have a non-empty flowchain: > > if (list_empty(&q->flows[i].flowchain)) { > arg->count++; > continue; > } > > That makes this ping the only thing that gets class 2:1 into the output. > > In the standard tdc setup this works. nsPlugin runs the command inside > the namespace, dummy is NOARP, and the 98-byte frame fits under tbf's > max_size of 100. > > If ping is missing, or doesn't accept -i 0.001 / -W 0.01, the "|| true" > and the redirect hide the error. The test then fails as a regex mismatch > in the verify stage, not as a setup error. > > Should this step be allowed to fail visibly? The same pattern is already > used elsewhere in tc-testing (infra/qdiscs.json), so it may be fine as is. Keeping it as is. tc-tests/infra/qdiscs.json (test ca5e, "Check class delete notification for ffff:") already uses the identical pattern: "ping -c1 -W0.01 -I $DUMMY 10.10.10.1 || true", as a setup step whose only job is to push a packet through the qdisc, with the same silent-failure trade-off described above. 83c0 follows existing practice here rather than introducing a new one. Regards, Hemendra