mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@ownmail.net>
To: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.org>,
	Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] smb/client(cifs): prepare for locking changes.
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 11:25:01 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260928012812.2890035-1-neilb@ownmail.net> (raw)

I am working on changes to directory locking.  The medium term goal is
to lift d_alloc_parallel() locking above i_rwsem, so d_alloc_paralle()
can be run unlocked, and consequently cannot be called when ->i_rwsem is
held.

The requires:
 1/ that d_alloc_parallel() not be called while i_rwsem is held.  cifs
    does this in a couple of places.  A new interface d_alloc_trylock()
    is now available and can be used instead.

 2/ a dentry must not be d_drop()ed while an operation is ongoing, as an
    unlocked d_alloc_parallel() would then be able to create a new
    dentry with the same name.  In particular d_rehash() must be phased
    out as it won't be safe.  This particularly affects the mechanism to
    block lookups/revalidates while an unlink/rename is happening.  The
    mechanism is changed to use one similar to how NFS addresses this
    needed, though using the new LOOKUP_PRIVATE flag.

The patches depend on patches recently added to the vfs tree.  I would
prefer these land in that tree too with an Acked-by or similar from cifs
maintainers.

Thanks,
NeilBrown

 [PATCH 1/3] smb/client: don't unhash and rehash to prevent new opens.
 [PATCH 2/3] smb/client: use d_alloc_trylock in cifs_silly_fullpath()
 [PATCH 3/3] smb/client: Use d_alloc_trylock() in cifs_prime_dcache()

             reply	other threads:[~2026-09-28  1:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-28  1:25 NeilBrown [this message]
2026-09-28  1:25 ` [PATCH 1/3] smb/client: don't unhash and rehash to prevent new opens NeilBrown
2026-10-21 15:30   ` Tom Talpey
2026-09-28  1:25 ` [PATCH 2/3] smb/client: use d_alloc_trylock in cifs_silly_fullpath() NeilBrown
2026-09-28  1:25 ` [PATCH 3/3] smb/client: Use d_alloc_trylock() in cifs_prime_dcache() NeilBrown
2026-10-21  9:55 ` [PATCH 0/3] smb/client(cifs): prepare for locking changes Christian Brauner
2026-10-21 15:31   ` Tom Talpey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260928012812.2890035-1-neilb@ownmail.net \
    --to=neilb@ownmail.net \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neil@brown.name \
    --cc=pc@manguebit.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®