From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mta1.migadu.com (out-183.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC6CB547042 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2026 02:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.183 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790562647; cv=none; b=G0g2x2KC/dKaigE6wAPx8n/97kuex8aLz1fzGIYGACRhhNUoI8Z7dRz8eFFHNLNb0U9eM+XPNPg7TqVhJmChhbHpkR1NSGpvs2pVE6rPkchYYwTmpo7vsts/FjE9Ai/aetym47q5wIFO5RFQLC0ucvvlSM99HN2yfUwrXCADdxI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790562647; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4+s99KWizSzbFmjJiglWm5XJ4fIhkEZlwghACv5Q8bE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=rnlR44lS5FM9edbtvuYyfphL/ucWH+nZHwLwKCjlOQFWLg9XMY/s7ugTOD1pNuc5I5LD9iO5QsJ0aL70vJHE8GpDAlKA/5Q5wuiwvEE7TBicGmBIVqeaJGnlkVehl1KNBCcBbIuTt0ZsbTg6GU51tliWwYKhn4cBwGfbcK7Zatw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=AWIz2X3A; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.183 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="AWIz2X3A" X-Envelope-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=4+s99KWizSzbFmjJiglWm5XJ4fIhkEZlwghACv5Q8bE=; c=simple/simple; d=linux.dev; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=key1; t=1790562643; v=1; x=1791167443; b=AWIz2X3AD/9gHxc0RebVCQOjyzIJg4Tu8t3j+fGfm1JDcLbi7gHHdmjzuMU7GtXyRyTtWh36 lyQ0jMaAqm0OSUSiwoRibh1ovQQ8Zeli+9WGADjuzIICsdS40yAmTcrBtLslPbM7hZqQrvFlnhf ZbC8fqobqFAXKp1cRqjlobrM= X-Envelope-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Received: by smtp.migadu.com with ESMTPS id 4c0fd7c181865d0e; Mon, 28 Sep 2026 02:30:29 +0000 X-Mizu-Trace-ID: 4c0fd7c181865d0e X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT From: George Guo To: rppt@kernel.org Cc: chenhuacai@kernel.org, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, pratyush@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, baoquan.he@linux.dev, ruirui.yang@linux.dev, guodongtai@kylinos.cn, liukexin@kylinos.cn, kernel@xen0n.name, graf@amazon.com, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] LoongArch: add KHO support and selftests Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 10:30:10 +0800 Message-ID: <20260928023010.3018-1-dongtai.guo@linux.dev> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Mike, On Sun, Sep 06, 2026 at 11:17:37PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > EFI KHO channel: > > I can't say I like "transport" and "channel" terminology. We don't send > anything anywhere. Agreed. It is just a table that the next kernel reads. v6 calls it the KHO EFI configuration table everywhere, and "transport" and "channel" are gone from the code, the commit messages and the cover letter. [...] > The text here and in the patches changelog reads reads as LLM-generated > text. First, it's quite blind and unreadable with wall-to-wall text. > Second, LLMs tend to describe what they did in the context of a session, > but since we apply the cover letter to the liveupdate tree, the description > here should *only* describe why the changes are required and how they are > implemented. The history belongs to changes since vN-1 section. > > And last, but not least, please add LLM attribution as per > > https://docs.kernel.org/process/coding-assistants.html#attribution You are right, and I am sorry. I used an LLM to help write this series. I meant to check every line word by word myself before sending, but I made a mistake and sent v5 to the list before doing that check. For v6: - The cover letter only explains why LoongArch needs this and how it works. Everything about earlier versions moves to "Changes since v5". - I am rewriting the cover letter and commit messages by hand, in short paragraphs, and checking every line myself before sending. - Every patch carries the Assisted-by tag if we used LLM. Thanks, George