From: Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>, Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
Baoquan He <baoquan.he@linux.dev>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org (open list:CONTROL GROUP - MEMORY
RESOURCE CONTROLLER (MEMCG)),
linux-mm@kvack.org (open list:CONTROL GROUP - MEMORY RESOURCE
CONTROLLER (MEMCG)), Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v2 3/7] mm/vmscan: move struct scan_control to a dedicated header
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 19:46:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260928114625.3609130-4-ridong.chen@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260928114625.3609130-1-ridong.chen@linux.dev>
From: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
The definition of struct scan_control has lived inline at the top of
mm/vmscan.c. Move it out to a new mm/vmscan.h so the reclaim-internal
state can be referenced from other reclaim translation units without
duplicating the definition.
The header uses an ordinary include guard and pulls in only what the
struct needs (nodemask_t, gfp_t and struct reclaim_state).
mm/trace_vmscan.h includes the new header directly so that any
translation unit pulling in the trace events (mm/vmscan.c, mm/shrinker.c)
sees the full definition of struct scan_control regardless of include
order.
No functional change.
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
Signed-off-by: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
---
MAINTAINERS | 2 +
mm/trace_vmscan.h | 2 +
mm/vmscan.c | 108 ------------------------------------------
mm/vmscan.h | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 mm/vmscan.h
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 281a6aca73cc..4751712d0b55 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -17231,6 +17231,7 @@ F: include/linux/mm_inline.h
F: include/linux/mmzone.h
F: mm/trace_vmscan.h
F: mm/vmscan.c
+F: mm/vmscan.h
F: mm/workingset.c
MEMORY MANAGEMENT - MIGRATION
@@ -17379,6 +17380,7 @@ L: linux-mm@kvack.org
S: Maintained
F: mm/trace_vmscan.h
F: mm/vmscan.c
+F: mm/vmscan.h
F: mm/workingset.c
MEMORY MANAGEMENT - RMAP (REVERSE MAPPING)
diff --git a/mm/trace_vmscan.h b/mm/trace_vmscan.h
index c5d824fef554..91fb1c30dd46 100644
--- a/mm/trace_vmscan.h
+++ b/mm/trace_vmscan.h
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
#include <linux/memcontrol.h>
#include <trace/events/mmflags.h>
+#include "vmscan.h"
+
#define RECLAIM_WB_ANON 0x0001u
#define RECLAIM_WB_FILE 0x0002u
#define RECLAIM_WB_MIXED 0x0010u
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 0eb7fa8e1d43..2fd9b42f89d8 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -73,114 +73,6 @@
#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
#include "trace_vmscan.h"
-struct scan_control {
- /* How many pages shrink_list() should reclaim */
- unsigned long nr_to_reclaim;
-
- /*
- * Nodemask of nodes allowed by the caller. If NULL, all nodes
- * are scanned.
- */
- const nodemask_t *nodemask;
-
- /*
- * The memory cgroup that hit its limit and as a result is the
- * primary target of this reclaim invocation.
- */
- struct mem_cgroup *target_mem_cgroup;
-
- /*
- * Scan pressure balancing between anon and file LRUs
- */
- unsigned long anon_cost;
- unsigned long file_cost;
-
- /* Swappiness value for proactive reclaim. Always use sc_swappiness()! */
- int *proactive_swappiness;
-
- /* Can active folios be deactivated as part of reclaim? */
-#define DEACTIVATE_ANON 1
-#define DEACTIVATE_FILE 2
- unsigned int may_deactivate:2;
- unsigned int force_deactivate:1;
- unsigned int skipped_deactivate:1;
-
- /* zone_reclaim_mode, boost reclaim */
- unsigned int may_writepage:1;
-
- /* zone_reclaim_mode */
- unsigned int may_unmap:1;
-
- /* zone_reclaim_mode, boost reclaim, cgroup restrictions */
- unsigned int may_swap:1;
-
- /* Not allow cache_trim_mode to be turned on as part of reclaim? */
- unsigned int no_cache_trim_mode:1;
-
- /* Has cache_trim_mode failed at least once? */
- unsigned int cache_trim_mode_failed:1;
-
- /* Proactive reclaim invoked by userspace */
- unsigned int proactive:1;
-
- /*
- * Cgroup memory below memory.low is protected as long as we
- * don't threaten to OOM. If any cgroup is reclaimed at
- * reduced force or passed over entirely due to its memory.low
- * setting (memcg_low_skipped), and nothing is reclaimed as a
- * result, then go back for one more cycle that reclaims the protected
- * memory (memcg_low_reclaim) to avert OOM.
- */
- unsigned int memcg_low_reclaim:1;
- unsigned int memcg_low_skipped:1;
-
- /* Shared cgroup tree walk failed, rescan the whole tree */
- unsigned int memcg_full_walk:1;
-
- unsigned int hibernation_mode:1;
-
- /* One of the zones is ready for compaction */
- unsigned int compaction_ready:1;
-
- /* There is easily reclaimable cold cache in the current node */
- unsigned int cache_trim_mode:1;
-
- /* The file folios on the current node are dangerously low */
- unsigned int file_is_tiny:1;
-
- /* Always discard instead of demoting to lower tier memory */
- unsigned int no_demotion:1;
-
- /* Allocation order */
- s8 order;
-
- /* Scan (total_size >> priority) pages at once */
- s8 priority;
-
- /* The highest zone to isolate folios for reclaim from */
- s8 reclaim_idx;
-
- /* This context's GFP mask */
- gfp_t gfp_mask;
-
- /* Incremented by the number of inactive pages that were scanned */
- unsigned long nr_scanned;
-
- /* Number of pages freed so far during a call to shrink_zones() */
- unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
-
- struct {
- unsigned int dirty;
- unsigned int congested;
- unsigned int writeback;
- unsigned int immediate;
- unsigned int taken;
- } nr;
-
- /* for recording the reclaimed slab by now */
- struct reclaim_state reclaim_state;
-};
-
#ifdef ARCH_HAS_PREFETCHW
static inline void prefetchw_prev_lru_folio(struct folio *folio,
struct list_head *base)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.h b/mm/vmscan.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..adb22e80d760
--- /dev/null
+++ b/mm/vmscan.h
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef _MM_VMSCAN_H
+#define _MM_VMSCAN_H
+
+#include <linux/gfp_types.h>
+#include <linux/nodemask.h>
+#include <linux/swap.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
+struct scan_control {
+ /* How many pages shrink_list() should reclaim */
+ unsigned long nr_to_reclaim;
+
+ /*
+ * Nodemask of nodes allowed by the caller. If NULL, all nodes
+ * are scanned.
+ */
+ const nodemask_t *nodemask;
+
+ /*
+ * The memory cgroup that hit its limit and as a result is the
+ * primary target of this reclaim invocation.
+ */
+ struct mem_cgroup *target_mem_cgroup;
+
+ /*
+ * Scan pressure balancing between anon and file LRUs
+ */
+ unsigned long anon_cost;
+ unsigned long file_cost;
+
+ /* Swappiness value for proactive reclaim. Always use sc_swappiness()! */
+ int *proactive_swappiness;
+
+ /* Can active folios be deactivated as part of reclaim? */
+#define DEACTIVATE_ANON 1
+#define DEACTIVATE_FILE 2
+ unsigned int may_deactivate:2;
+ unsigned int force_deactivate:1;
+ unsigned int skipped_deactivate:1;
+
+ /* zone_reclaim_mode, boost reclaim */
+ unsigned int may_writepage:1;
+
+ /* zone_reclaim_mode */
+ unsigned int may_unmap:1;
+
+ /* zone_reclaim_mode, boost reclaim, cgroup restrictions */
+ unsigned int may_swap:1;
+
+ /* Not allow cache_trim_mode to be turned on as part of reclaim? */
+ unsigned int no_cache_trim_mode:1;
+
+ /* Has cache_trim_mode failed at least once? */
+ unsigned int cache_trim_mode_failed:1;
+
+ /* Proactive reclaim invoked by userspace */
+ unsigned int proactive:1;
+
+ /*
+ * Cgroup memory below memory.low is protected as long as we
+ * don't threaten to OOM. If any cgroup is reclaimed at
+ * reduced force or passed over entirely due to its memory.low
+ * setting (memcg_low_skipped), and nothing is reclaimed as a
+ * result, then go back for one more cycle that reclaims the protected
+ * memory (memcg_low_reclaim) to avert OOM.
+ */
+ unsigned int memcg_low_reclaim:1;
+ unsigned int memcg_low_skipped:1;
+
+ /* Shared cgroup tree walk failed, rescan the whole tree */
+ unsigned int memcg_full_walk:1;
+
+ unsigned int hibernation_mode:1;
+
+ /* One of the zones is ready for compaction */
+ unsigned int compaction_ready:1;
+
+ /* There is easily reclaimable cold cache in the current node */
+ unsigned int cache_trim_mode:1;
+
+ /* The file folios on the current node are dangerously low */
+ unsigned int file_is_tiny:1;
+
+ /* Always discard instead of demoting to lower tier memory */
+ unsigned int no_demotion:1;
+
+ /* Allocation order */
+ s8 order;
+
+ /* Scan (total_size >> priority) pages at once */
+ s8 priority;
+
+ /* The highest zone to isolate folios for reclaim from */
+ s8 reclaim_idx;
+
+ /* This context's GFP mask */
+ gfp_t gfp_mask;
+
+ /* Incremented by the number of inactive pages that were scanned */
+ unsigned long nr_scanned;
+
+ /* Number of pages freed so far during a call to shrink_zones() */
+ unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
+
+ struct {
+ unsigned int dirty;
+ unsigned int congested;
+ unsigned int writeback;
+ unsigned int immediate;
+ unsigned int taken;
+ } nr;
+
+ /* for recording the reclaimed slab by now */
+ struct reclaim_state reclaim_state;
+};
+
+#endif /* _MM_VMSCAN_H */
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-28 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-28 11:46 [PATCH RFC v2 0/7] mm/vmscan: move vmscan tracepoints to a local header Ridong Chen
2026-09-28 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/7] mm/memcontrol: drop unused vmscan tracepoint include Ridong Chen
2026-09-28 12:08 ` Muchun Song
2026-09-29 1:23 ` Ridong Chen
2026-09-28 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/7] mm/vmscan: move vmscan tracepoints to a local header Ridong Chen
2026-09-28 11:46 ` Ridong Chen [this message]
2026-09-28 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC v2 4/7] mm/vmscan: pass scan_control to the reclaim-begin tracepoints Ridong Chen
2026-09-28 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC v2 5/7] mm/vmscan: pass scan_control to the LRU isolate/shrink tracepoints Ridong Chen
2026-09-28 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC v2 6/7] mm/vmscan: pass scan_control to mm_vmscan_reclaim_pages Ridong Chen
2026-09-28 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC v2 7/7] mm/vmscan: pass scan_control to mm_vmscan_balance_pgdat_end Ridong Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260928114625.3609130-4-ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--to=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@xiaomi.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®