mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>, Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>,
	Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
	Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
	Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
	Baoquan He <baoquan.he@linux.dev>,
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org (open list:CONTROL GROUP - MEMORY
	RESOURCE CONTROLLER (MEMCG)),
	linux-mm@kvack.org (open list:CONTROL GROUP - MEMORY RESOURCE
	CONTROLLER (MEMCG)), Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
	Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v2 3/7] mm/vmscan: move struct scan_control to a dedicated header
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 19:46:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260928114625.3609130-4-ridong.chen@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260928114625.3609130-1-ridong.chen@linux.dev>

From: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>

The definition of struct scan_control has lived inline at the top of
mm/vmscan.c. Move it out to a new mm/vmscan.h so the reclaim-internal
state can be referenced from other reclaim translation units without
duplicating the definition.

The header uses an ordinary include guard and pulls in only what the
struct needs (nodemask_t, gfp_t and struct reclaim_state).

mm/trace_vmscan.h includes the new header directly so that any
translation unit pulling in the trace events (mm/vmscan.c, mm/shrinker.c)
sees the full definition of struct scan_control regardless of include
order.

No functional change.

Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
Signed-off-by: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
---
 MAINTAINERS       |   2 +
 mm/trace_vmscan.h |   2 +
 mm/vmscan.c       | 108 ------------------------------------------
 mm/vmscan.h       | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 mm/vmscan.h

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 281a6aca73cc..4751712d0b55 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -17231,6 +17231,7 @@ F:	include/linux/mm_inline.h
 F:	include/linux/mmzone.h
 F:	mm/trace_vmscan.h
 F:	mm/vmscan.c
+F:	mm/vmscan.h
 F:	mm/workingset.c
 
 MEMORY MANAGEMENT - MIGRATION
@@ -17379,6 +17380,7 @@ L:	linux-mm@kvack.org
 S:	Maintained
 F:	mm/trace_vmscan.h
 F:	mm/vmscan.c
+F:	mm/vmscan.h
 F:	mm/workingset.c
 
 MEMORY MANAGEMENT - RMAP (REVERSE MAPPING)
diff --git a/mm/trace_vmscan.h b/mm/trace_vmscan.h
index c5d824fef554..91fb1c30dd46 100644
--- a/mm/trace_vmscan.h
+++ b/mm/trace_vmscan.h
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
 #include <linux/memcontrol.h>
 #include <trace/events/mmflags.h>
 
+#include "vmscan.h"
+
 #define RECLAIM_WB_ANON		0x0001u
 #define RECLAIM_WB_FILE		0x0002u
 #define RECLAIM_WB_MIXED	0x0010u
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 0eb7fa8e1d43..2fd9b42f89d8 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -73,114 +73,6 @@
 #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
 #include "trace_vmscan.h"
 
-struct scan_control {
-	/* How many pages shrink_list() should reclaim */
-	unsigned long nr_to_reclaim;
-
-	/*
-	 * Nodemask of nodes allowed by the caller. If NULL, all nodes
-	 * are scanned.
-	 */
-	const nodemask_t *nodemask;
-
-	/*
-	 * The memory cgroup that hit its limit and as a result is the
-	 * primary target of this reclaim invocation.
-	 */
-	struct mem_cgroup *target_mem_cgroup;
-
-	/*
-	 * Scan pressure balancing between anon and file LRUs
-	 */
-	unsigned long	anon_cost;
-	unsigned long	file_cost;
-
-	/* Swappiness value for proactive reclaim. Always use sc_swappiness()! */
-	int *proactive_swappiness;
-
-	/* Can active folios be deactivated as part of reclaim? */
-#define DEACTIVATE_ANON 1
-#define DEACTIVATE_FILE 2
-	unsigned int may_deactivate:2;
-	unsigned int force_deactivate:1;
-	unsigned int skipped_deactivate:1;
-
-	/* zone_reclaim_mode, boost reclaim */
-	unsigned int may_writepage:1;
-
-	/* zone_reclaim_mode */
-	unsigned int may_unmap:1;
-
-	/* zone_reclaim_mode, boost reclaim, cgroup restrictions */
-	unsigned int may_swap:1;
-
-	/* Not allow cache_trim_mode to be turned on as part of reclaim? */
-	unsigned int no_cache_trim_mode:1;
-
-	/* Has cache_trim_mode failed at least once? */
-	unsigned int cache_trim_mode_failed:1;
-
-	/* Proactive reclaim invoked by userspace */
-	unsigned int proactive:1;
-
-	/*
-	 * Cgroup memory below memory.low is protected as long as we
-	 * don't threaten to OOM. If any cgroup is reclaimed at
-	 * reduced force or passed over entirely due to its memory.low
-	 * setting (memcg_low_skipped), and nothing is reclaimed as a
-	 * result, then go back for one more cycle that reclaims the protected
-	 * memory (memcg_low_reclaim) to avert OOM.
-	 */
-	unsigned int memcg_low_reclaim:1;
-	unsigned int memcg_low_skipped:1;
-
-	/* Shared cgroup tree walk failed, rescan the whole tree */
-	unsigned int memcg_full_walk:1;
-
-	unsigned int hibernation_mode:1;
-
-	/* One of the zones is ready for compaction */
-	unsigned int compaction_ready:1;
-
-	/* There is easily reclaimable cold cache in the current node */
-	unsigned int cache_trim_mode:1;
-
-	/* The file folios on the current node are dangerously low */
-	unsigned int file_is_tiny:1;
-
-	/* Always discard instead of demoting to lower tier memory */
-	unsigned int no_demotion:1;
-
-	/* Allocation order */
-	s8 order;
-
-	/* Scan (total_size >> priority) pages at once */
-	s8 priority;
-
-	/* The highest zone to isolate folios for reclaim from */
-	s8 reclaim_idx;
-
-	/* This context's GFP mask */
-	gfp_t gfp_mask;
-
-	/* Incremented by the number of inactive pages that were scanned */
-	unsigned long nr_scanned;
-
-	/* Number of pages freed so far during a call to shrink_zones() */
-	unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
-
-	struct {
-		unsigned int dirty;
-		unsigned int congested;
-		unsigned int writeback;
-		unsigned int immediate;
-		unsigned int taken;
-	} nr;
-
-	/* for recording the reclaimed slab by now */
-	struct reclaim_state reclaim_state;
-};
-
 #ifdef ARCH_HAS_PREFETCHW
 static inline void prefetchw_prev_lru_folio(struct folio *folio,
 		struct list_head *base)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.h b/mm/vmscan.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..adb22e80d760
--- /dev/null
+++ b/mm/vmscan.h
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef _MM_VMSCAN_H
+#define _MM_VMSCAN_H
+
+#include <linux/gfp_types.h>
+#include <linux/nodemask.h>
+#include <linux/swap.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
+struct scan_control {
+	/* How many pages shrink_list() should reclaim */
+	unsigned long nr_to_reclaim;
+
+	/*
+	 * Nodemask of nodes allowed by the caller. If NULL, all nodes
+	 * are scanned.
+	 */
+	const nodemask_t *nodemask;
+
+	/*
+	 * The memory cgroup that hit its limit and as a result is the
+	 * primary target of this reclaim invocation.
+	 */
+	struct mem_cgroup *target_mem_cgroup;
+
+	/*
+	 * Scan pressure balancing between anon and file LRUs
+	 */
+	unsigned long	anon_cost;
+	unsigned long	file_cost;
+
+	/* Swappiness value for proactive reclaim. Always use sc_swappiness()! */
+	int *proactive_swappiness;
+
+	/* Can active folios be deactivated as part of reclaim? */
+#define DEACTIVATE_ANON 1
+#define DEACTIVATE_FILE 2
+	unsigned int may_deactivate:2;
+	unsigned int force_deactivate:1;
+	unsigned int skipped_deactivate:1;
+
+	/* zone_reclaim_mode, boost reclaim */
+	unsigned int may_writepage:1;
+
+	/* zone_reclaim_mode */
+	unsigned int may_unmap:1;
+
+	/* zone_reclaim_mode, boost reclaim, cgroup restrictions */
+	unsigned int may_swap:1;
+
+	/* Not allow cache_trim_mode to be turned on as part of reclaim? */
+	unsigned int no_cache_trim_mode:1;
+
+	/* Has cache_trim_mode failed at least once? */
+	unsigned int cache_trim_mode_failed:1;
+
+	/* Proactive reclaim invoked by userspace */
+	unsigned int proactive:1;
+
+	/*
+	 * Cgroup memory below memory.low is protected as long as we
+	 * don't threaten to OOM. If any cgroup is reclaimed at
+	 * reduced force or passed over entirely due to its memory.low
+	 * setting (memcg_low_skipped), and nothing is reclaimed as a
+	 * result, then go back for one more cycle that reclaims the protected
+	 * memory (memcg_low_reclaim) to avert OOM.
+	 */
+	unsigned int memcg_low_reclaim:1;
+	unsigned int memcg_low_skipped:1;
+
+	/* Shared cgroup tree walk failed, rescan the whole tree */
+	unsigned int memcg_full_walk:1;
+
+	unsigned int hibernation_mode:1;
+
+	/* One of the zones is ready for compaction */
+	unsigned int compaction_ready:1;
+
+	/* There is easily reclaimable cold cache in the current node */
+	unsigned int cache_trim_mode:1;
+
+	/* The file folios on the current node are dangerously low */
+	unsigned int file_is_tiny:1;
+
+	/* Always discard instead of demoting to lower tier memory */
+	unsigned int no_demotion:1;
+
+	/* Allocation order */
+	s8 order;
+
+	/* Scan (total_size >> priority) pages at once */
+	s8 priority;
+
+	/* The highest zone to isolate folios for reclaim from */
+	s8 reclaim_idx;
+
+	/* This context's GFP mask */
+	gfp_t gfp_mask;
+
+	/* Incremented by the number of inactive pages that were scanned */
+	unsigned long nr_scanned;
+
+	/* Number of pages freed so far during a call to shrink_zones() */
+	unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
+
+	struct {
+		unsigned int dirty;
+		unsigned int congested;
+		unsigned int writeback;
+		unsigned int immediate;
+		unsigned int taken;
+	} nr;
+
+	/* for recording the reclaimed slab by now */
+	struct reclaim_state reclaim_state;
+};
+
+#endif /* _MM_VMSCAN_H */
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-28 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-28 11:46 [PATCH RFC v2 0/7] mm/vmscan: move vmscan tracepoints to a local header Ridong Chen
2026-09-28 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/7] mm/memcontrol: drop unused vmscan tracepoint include Ridong Chen
2026-09-28 12:08   ` Muchun Song
2026-09-29  1:23     ` Ridong Chen
2026-09-28 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/7] mm/vmscan: move vmscan tracepoints to a local header Ridong Chen
2026-09-28 11:46 ` Ridong Chen [this message]
2026-09-28 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC v2 4/7] mm/vmscan: pass scan_control to the reclaim-begin tracepoints Ridong Chen
2026-09-28 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC v2 5/7] mm/vmscan: pass scan_control to the LRU isolate/shrink tracepoints Ridong Chen
2026-09-28 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC v2 6/7] mm/vmscan: pass scan_control to mm_vmscan_reclaim_pages Ridong Chen
2026-09-28 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC v2 7/7] mm/vmscan: pass scan_control to mm_vmscan_balance_pgdat_end Ridong Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260928114625.3609130-4-ridong.chen@linux.dev \
    --to=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chenridong@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kasong@tencent.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=yuanchu@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®