mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>
To: bhelgaas@google.com, david.laight.linux@gmail.com
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>,
	syzbot+7134530b25073b4ef373@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] PCI: sysfs: Reject unaligned resource I/O port accesses
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 18:00:36 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260928123036.7902-1-kartikey406@gmail.com> (raw)

pci_resource_io() validates that the requested port lies within the
BAR but never checks that it is aligned to the access size. A
pwrite64()/pread64() on a resourceN file with an odd offset and
count=2 or count=4 reaches outw()/outl() with a misaligned address.
On arm64 this becomes a store/load to a Device-memory mapping
(PCI_IOBASE + port), which architecturally requires natural
alignment, causing an alignment fault and kernel oops.

Reject misaligned 2- and 4-byte accesses before they reach the
low-level accessor. With natural alignment enforced, an access that
starts inside the BAR cannot extend past its end, so drop the
port + count - 1 range check.

Reported-by: syzbot+7134530b25073b4ef373@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7134530b25073b4ef373
Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>
---
v2: Check alignment per access size in the case 2/case 4 branches
    instead of using IS_ALIGNED() with a user-controlled count, and
    drop the now-redundant port + count - 1 range check.
    (Bjorn, David, sashiko)
---
 drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
index 1f21856aac8a..8118cc6b3a61 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
@@ -1209,9 +1209,6 @@ static ssize_t pci_resource_io(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
 	if (port > pci_resource_end(pdev, bar))
 		return 0;
 
-	if (port + count - 1 > pci_resource_end(pdev, bar))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	switch (count) {
 	case 1:
 		if (write)
@@ -1220,12 +1217,16 @@ static ssize_t pci_resource_io(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
 			*(u8 *)buf = inb(port);
 		return 1;
 	case 2:
+		if (port & 1)
+			return -EINVAL;
 		if (write)
 			outw(*(u16 *)buf, port);
 		else
 			*(u16 *)buf = inw(port);
 		return 2;
 	case 4:
+		if (port & 3)
+			return -EINVAL;
 		if (write)
 			outl(*(u32 *)buf, port);
 		else
-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-09-28 12:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-28 12:30 Deepanshu Kartikey [this message]
2026-09-28 12:57 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-09-28 18:17   ` David Laight

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260928123036.7902-1-kartikey406@gmail.com \
    --to=kartikey406@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+7134530b25073b4ef373@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®