From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0414C4D90AF; Mon, 28 Sep 2026 16:56:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790614590; cv=none; b=KK8fGIQDpGeNB6yhr0Yhhb7Qu9Zib1hYzb9AQl92HMfT0OS98NvOj49nFNUnyWrnAX/IizcQiq8UkkoX2JXwP2MDa8s+yD2sP3qrt0/Yr9njeTK2M6JqHg4vRYM9uO7P442MSt6U6B8yAki90Ogw7REGMnr12uPz1JmDiZhG7ak= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790614590; c=relaxed/simple; bh=I2BetFeSEOimiagM5fZoUJYuONuerQXiE6VR6C3lLx0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=JS18e7WqVfvx3/auiRymnSZo/ws7GHdyimTQYNnbXfLgomnXnXHrZh6G6bZX0jI3r0M/FVfKaxYzNEfGwCG/y76lRt/CU6iUFHbY245ye4MEXz3wPakXPgR+CcTR7CU60kqS1avoru/NkBnRYNJUFiyIYhqZH4PhyjLPdhZ2V6A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=PlxyqhuN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="PlxyqhuN" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 68CC61F000FF; Mon, 28 Sep 2026 16:56:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790614588; bh=qdMdQ7xNoZT0JPAPrDLZpRnRksX8EJod56eBhYE2+9E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=PlxyqhuNqRl8HaNDmVdbT+HILDG54Fx6nLK9YGA8zHZwvvHeEUhVe1JQIGH8iTacq 8y5MEMW3W5MaIZPUOaXBuAOesY18jLR3zkhGNriuTfbwfyCl+PG+tvDJxx+YPjDyHs wxGmmhsuinQi7MTzj6li8NyL9BFRWdAxmUC/DdvxJocRYPa8n9QMt0hthYAL4zFLDF ctll5WnKHJNHpGpCACfOnf0NLGg9SZ+TI0ml/qJ+PLtJaACtH1HQa7C1zWEXhWPCOY qs7b0qD7jhVRLBvlRCOa3eyuo4kKzFWahoMP/PIxbqj8dIuVrxrfFfL7gxMiNyvNCR Wv63+0e0ws+mA== From: SJ Park To: Enze Li Cc: SJ Park , ojeda@kernel.org, boqun@kernel.org, gary@garyguo.net, bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com, lossin@kernel.org, a.hindborg@kernel.org, aliceryhl@google.com, tmgross@umich.edu, dakr@kernel.org, daniel.almeida@collabora.com, tamird@kernel.org, acourbot@nvidia.com, work@onurozkan.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org, enze.li@gmx.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] rust: damon: a first small step, plus a Rust prcl sample Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 09:56:20 -0700 Message-ID: <20260928165621.18850-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Mon, 28 Sep 2026 20:59:45 +0800 Enze Li wrote: > Hi SJ, > > Thank you for the detailed reply. Comments inline below. > > On 9/27/26 18:07, SJ Park wrote: [...] > > I understand this patch series is a kind of experiment rather than for a real > > use case that has a hard deadline. If I'm not incorrect, I feel like this > > might not be the best time to start the experiment. Could we wait until > > fundamental parts including module parameters support in Rust and ongoing DAMON > > reconstruction, or my learning of Rust are done and stabilized? > > Yes. I will park the patches and restart once both are true: > > 1. Rust supports writable/sysfs-backed module parameters. > 2. the DAMON API reconstruction has settled enough that wrappers can > target the new interfaces directly. > > Meanwhile I will keep working on DAMON in C as usual. Thank you for accepting my humble suggestion, Enze. If anybody has different optinions, please feel free to weigh in, though. Thanks, SJ [...]