From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F0332DEA75; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 00:00:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790640059; cv=none; b=J6t0Wq8KCDW3wxx3XWX0KI3msr0ax7OWAXEFTk4LKgB6tuUShadIvhwjVucwBuqQCgLt/mKph5Ch8QDhXfvJT1AMI0UI06uWIEhp6RI1LA/Ni4YW8Jdp08VwR1tmaT8VORYkALpJZbudA0VqhzfF2LgNGl13/Y9UkeUT5c1gmpc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790640059; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xMkNX6KhXJ1rcmQ6GQ3sV7tU41WHH9YSZaJDyux8Xgg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=bEtCtvULnsWE1EfOJLgnuEoCGDVbTYKlEuAdLbJKx8U0xlRS7PLRr2RoQYN0xfbuO5hk3xmMkB0l8rO4Q4gmmplgA4SQwppFWxXp44OnY5950/LoKIUW2XedC6IsdQMsXCH9V251NZtmuGJImBq2lI1xVrQDLdqtNCaP/oXmPxU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=WtUuVAC7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="WtUuVAC7" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A8801F000FF; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 00:00:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790640057; bh=4jXAS4oY5mgsnaydb1SE0LgAUGjvCpMjf9ZXzrPnafU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=WtUuVAC7GM3nBR79gn3Mwz2yj4pXOUju1VtFUsnLA41DjgBqXQ77W5+y1Z9v1qknL t6QRvjoyEwWScDZc0vOCvI2/bSBj1M2ZOHohuItC9Zcjn+6jLxiIuO4KYWVYl1Vhj2 e260xAi0/ErovWDpOEKtWTDbQtgrpHBSUwTqwUR70zhPxBPrdC21ggUCaJhEIPrc7c 9/S9t6pt9whl4ZZGKJH/OgDZrVyGh26yVfnr74SNqzAPZXkJ5dE6T2RwpcRVThghga YIUlE2Q5JwQUe1oVyyMyoCwTT6MoD+EhrsUyDfI0rCOWp6gW4oK++eQmuHDC7sUU3p DaMNMHmbdf5JQ== Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 17:00:56 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Florian Fainelli Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Nicolai Buchwitz , Doug Berger , Broadcom internal kernel review list , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Zak Kemble , Simon Horman , Ryo Takakura , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 02/10] net: systemport: Fix invalid dev_id argument in bcm_sysport_poll_controller() Message-ID: <20260928170056.33dbd040@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260922232440.598918-3-florian.fainelli@broadcom.com> References: <20260922232440.598918-1-florian.fainelli@broadcom.com> <20260922232440.598918-3-florian.fainelli@broadcom.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 22 Sep 2026 16:24:32 -0700 Florian Fainelli wrote: > Both bcm_sysport_rx_isr() and bcm_sysport_tx_isr() expect their second > argument (dev_id) to be a 'struct net_device *dev', as they call > netdev_priv(dev) to retrieve the private data structure. > > bcm_sysport_poll_controller() was passing 'priv' instead of 'dev', > causing netdev_priv() inside the ISRs to treat 'priv' as a net_device, > leading to out-of-bounds pointer calculations and crashes when netconsole > or netpoll is triggered. Can we not delete this ndo_poll_controlle and let NAPI polling take care of netpoll?