mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@skynet.be>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: uvcvideo: Fix bounds for descriptor parsing
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 21:44:29 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260928184429.GE210522@killaraus.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANiDSCvvJd0_taNYvHm894kPpyOWQ+TaxC_XRVOs5qrUHod08Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 04:03:15PM +0200, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Sept 2026 at 14:41, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 02:35:29PM +0200, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> > > On Mon, 28 Sept 2026 at 14:24, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 02:10:26PM +0200, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 28 Sept 2026 at 14:02, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 01:23:50PM +0000, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> > > > > > > uvc_parse_control() passes descriptor by descriptor to
> > > > > > > uvc_parse_standard_control() with the number of bytes remaining in the
> > > > > > > buffer, not the number of bytes of that descriptor.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Because of this, malformed descriptors could leak over the next
> > > > > > > descriptor, leaving malformed data in our structures.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What issue does this fix in practice ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Look into uvc_parse_standard_control().
> > > > > Let's take the UVC_VC_HEADER
> > > > >
> > > > > Imagine we have a malformed control at the beginning of the descriptor that has:
> > > > >
> > > > > buffer[0] = 3
> > > > > buffer[2] = UVC_VC_HEADER
> > > > > buffer[3] => Beggining of next control
> > > > >
> > > > > With the current code, buffer[3...X] is parsed as UVC_VC_HEADER.
> > > > >
> > > > > What does it fix in practice? It avoids that data outside the controls
> > > > > is parsed as part of the control.
> > > >
> > > > I understand that, but what does it fix in practice ? And have you
> > > > encountered a device that exhibits such a problem ?
> > >
> > > I have not encountered such devices, but even if they do not exist
> > > they are easy to emulate and use for escalation.
> >
> > That's what I'd like to understand, can this be used for any kind of
> > escalation ?
> 
> It is very difficult (impossible?) to prove that something is not
> exploitable, especially as the code evolves.

Regardless of whether or not all the bytes parsed by the
uvc_parse_vendor_control() and uvc_parse_vendor_control() functions are
part of the control descriptor or are split across multiple descriptors,
they all come from the USB descriptors buffer and are all ultimately
under device control.

As far as I can tell, all this patch does it add a check on buffer[0]
but has no impact on anything else. If a device can supply USB
descriptors data with an invalid buffer[0] that currently causes any
type of issue in the driver, the same device could supply the exact same
USB descriptors with buffer[0] set to a value that will be accepted and
still cause the same issue. Am I missing something ?

> We could spend hours trying to craft a payload, plus extra time in
> future reviews whenever uvc_parse_vendor_control() changes. It is much
> safer to just enforce the correct bounds now.

So is your concern only about introducing issues in the future without
noticing ?

> As you said, the risk to break current hardware is low. If it happens
> tis change is small enough to make it easy to revert.
> 
> > > We add minimal code and solve a family of bugs. Do you think that it
> > > is a better pattern that uvc_parse_vendor_control() and
> > > uvc_parse_vendor_control() have visibility beyond the control that
> > > they are parsing?
> >
> > I'm concerned that some devices may stop working. The risk is likely
> > small though, but I'd like to understand what we get from this patch to
> > see if it's worth the risk.
> >
> > > > > > > Change the code so we pass the actual length of the descriptor to the
> > > > > > > parser.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Note that this makes the existing check more strict and some devices
> > > > > > > that are wrongly parsed today will not be probed now.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > > > Fixes: c0efd232929c ("V4L/DVB (8145a): USB Video Class driver")
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > >  drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c | 7 +++++--
> > > > > > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c
> > > > > > > index e289cc71ba98..429f1ab19a2a 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c
> > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c
> > > > > > > @@ -1248,11 +1248,14 @@ static int uvc_parse_control(struct uvc_device *dev)
> > > > > > >        */
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >       while (buflen > 2) {
> > > > > > > -             if (uvc_parse_vendor_control(dev, buffer, buflen) ||
> > > > > > > +             if (buflen < buffer[0] || buffer[0] < 3)
> > > > > > > +                     return -EINVAL;
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > +             if (uvc_parse_vendor_control(dev, buffer, buffer[0]) ||
> > > > > > >                   buffer[1] != USB_DT_CS_INTERFACE)
> > > > > > >                       goto next_descriptor;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -             ret = uvc_parse_standard_control(dev, buffer, buflen);
> > > > > > > +             ret = uvc_parse_standard_control(dev, buffer, buffer[0]);
> > > > > > >               if (ret < 0)
> > > > > > >                       return ret;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > base-commit: 27953c044974baf7e24dee3e9342fe0103dea80c
> > > > > > > change-id: 20260911-uvc-ctrl-bound-9c1940f06fc7

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-28 18:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-11 13:23 Ricardo Ribalda
2026-09-28 12:02 ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-09-28 12:10   ` Ricardo Ribalda
2026-09-28 12:24     ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-09-28 12:35       ` Ricardo Ribalda
2026-09-28 12:41         ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-09-28 14:03           ` Ricardo Ribalda
2026-09-28 18:44             ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2026-09-28 19:03               ` Ricardo Ribalda
2026-09-28 19:44                 ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-09-28 19:49                   ` Ricardo Ribalda
2026-09-28 19:55                     ` Laurent Pinchart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260928184429.GE210522@killaraus.ideasonboard.com \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=hansg@kernel.org \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@skynet.be \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=ribalda@chromium.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®