From: Krishna Kurapati <krishna.kurapati@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Krishna Kurapati <krishna.kurapati@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] usb: dwc3: core: Fix RAM interface getting stuck during enumeration
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 10:49:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260929-ram-interface-stuck-v3-v3-1-0d1a54db233c@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
During plug-in/plug-out test cases, it is sometimes seen that no events
are generated by the controller and all CSR register reads give "0" and
CSR_Timeout bit gets set indicating that CSR reads/writes are timing out
or timed out.
The issue comes up on different instnaces of enumeration on different
platforms. On SM8550, the debug log is as follows:
Prepared a TRB on ep0out and did start transfer to get set
address request from host:
<...>-7191 [000] D..1. 66.421006: dwc3_gadget_ep_cmd: ep0out:
cmd 'Start Transfer' [406] params 00000000 efffa000 00000000 -->
status: Successful
<...>-7191 [000] D..1. 66.421196: dwc3_event: event (0000c040):
ep0out: Transfer Complete (sIL) [Setup Phase]
<...>-7191 [000] D..1. 66.421197: dwc3_ctrl_req: Set
Address(Addr = 01)
An XFER NRDY is received on ep0in for zero length status phase and
a Start Transfer was done on ep0in with 0-length packet in 2 Stage
status phase:
<...>-7191 [000] D..1. 66.421249: dwc3_event: event (000020c2):
ep0in: Transfer Not Ready [00000000] (Not Active) [Status Phase]
<...>-7191 [000] D..1. 66.421266: dwc3_prepare_trb: ep0in: trb
ffffffc00fcfd000 (E0:D0) buf 00000000efffa000 size 0 ctrl 00000c33
sofn 00000000 (HLcs:SC:status2)
<...>-7191 [000] D..1. 66.421387: dwc3_gadget_ep_cmd: ep0in: cmd
'Start Transfer' [406] params 00000000 efffa000 00000000 -->status:
Successful
A bus reset was then received directly after 500 msec. Software never
got the cmd complete for the start transfer done in status phase. Here
the RAM interface is stuck. So host issues a bus reset as link is
idle for 500 msec:
<...>-7191 [000] D..1. 66.935603: dwc3_event: event (00000101):
Reset [U0]
Then software sees that it is in status phase and we issue an ENDXFER
on ep0in and it gets timedout waiting for the CMDACT to go '0':
<...>-7191 [000] D..1. 66.958249: dwc3_gadget_ep_cmd: ep0in: cmd
'End Transfer' [10508] params 00000000 00000000 00000000 --> status:
Timed Out
Upon debug with Synopsys, the root cause is as follows:
During any transfer, if the data is not successfully transmitted,
then a Done (with failure) handshake is returned, so that the BMU
can re-attempt the same data again by rewinding its data pointers.
But, if the USB IN is a 0-length payload (which is what is happening
in this case - 2 stage status phase of set_address), then there is no
need to rewind the pointers and the Done (with failure) handshake is
not returned for failure case. This keeps the Request-Done interface
busy till the next Done handshake. The MAC sends the 0-length payload
again when the host requests. If the transmission is successful this
time, the Done (with success) handshake is provided back. Otherwise,
it repeats the same steps again.
If the cable is disconnected or if the Host aborts the transfer on 3
consecutive failed attempts, the Request-Done handshake is not
complete. This keeps the interface busy.
The subsequent RAM access cannot proceed until the above pending
transfer is complete. This results in failure of any access to RAM
address locations. Many of the EndPoint commands need to access the
RAM and they would fail to complete successfully.
Furthermore when cable removal happens, this would not generate a
disconnect event and the "connected" flag remains true always blockin
suspend.
Synopsys confirmed that the issue is present on all USB3 devices and
as a workaround, suggested to re-initialize device mode.
Signed-off-by: Krishna Kurapati <krishna.kurapati@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
This series has only been compile tested. The issue was reproduced
easily with a certain kind of cable and CDP port of AMD based Lenovo
laptop. I don't have access to the cable currently and hence only
compile testing the fix for now. But the issue has popped up on OEM
testing as well.
Also, didn't add locking while calling error recovery work in
gadget_ep_cmd since the caller is supposed to handle it.
Changes to v3:
- Using error receovery mechanism from [1].
Link to v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260806-ram-interface-code-v2-1-fe4a0de31d42@oss.qualcomm.com/
Changes in v2:
- Implemented gadget recovery mechanism during gadget_ep_cmd instead of
handling this issue only during disconnect.
Link to RFC:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231011100214.25720-1-quic_kriskura@quicinc.com/
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260915110637.17658-1-jiazi.liu1984@gmail.com/
---
drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
index ee837235630a..a7c4514cf0e2 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
@@ -283,6 +283,8 @@ int dwc3_send_gadget_generic_command(struct dwc3 *dwc, unsigned int cmd,
return ret;
}
+static void dwc3_schedule_err_recovery(struct dwc3 *dwc);
+
/**
* dwc3_send_gadget_ep_cmd - issue an endpoint command
* @dep: the endpoint to which the command is going to be issued
@@ -432,6 +434,23 @@ int dwc3_send_gadget_ep_cmd(struct dwc3_ep *dep, unsigned int cmd,
cmd_status = -ETIMEDOUT;
}
+ /*
+ * STAR 5001544 - In some situations, like the cable is
+ * disconnected or if the Host aborts the transfer on 3
+ * consecutive failed attempts, the Request-Done handshake is not
+ * complete. This keeps the RAM interface busy.
+ *
+ * The subsequent RAM access cannot proceed until the pending
+ * transfer is complete. This results in failure of any access
+ * to RAM address locations. Many of the EndPoint commands need to
+ * access the RAM and they would fail to complete successfully.
+ *
+ * If the depcmd doesn't match the actual command, trigger controller
+ * recovery.
+ */
+ if (DWC3_DEPCMD_CMD(reg) != DWC3_DEPCMD_CMD(cmd))
+ dwc3_schedule_err_recovery(dwc);
+
skip_status:
trace_dwc3_gadget_ep_cmd(dep, cmd, params, cmd_status);
---
base-commit: ab29ca7714b82485ebb31d66835ccd5364221a76
change-id: 20260929-ram-interface-stuck-v3-aaf0c4b13b98
Best regards,
--
Krishna Kurapati <krishna.kurapati@oss.qualcomm.com>
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-29 5:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20260929051941epcas5p27a5c69151937b9105660941776cda819@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2026-09-29 5:19 ` Krishna Kurapati [this message]
2026-09-29 6:45 ` Selvarasu Ganesan
2026-09-29 8:35 ` Krishna Kurapati
2026-09-29 11:02 ` Selvarasu Ganesan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260929-ram-interface-stuck-v3-v3-1-0d1a54db233c@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=krishna.kurapati@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®